Therapeutic Melodies: How Classical Turkish Music Soothes Stress and Eases Loneliness

May 15, 2023 updated by: Gizem Beycan Ekitli, PhD., Ege University

Therapeutic Melodies: How Classical Turkish Music Soothes Stress and Eases Loneliness - A Randomized Controlled Trial With Elders

This study investigated the impact of traditional classical Turkish music as a telehealth intervention on reducing stress and loneliness among elderly individuals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was conducted at one of the Third Age University as a single-blind randomized and control-group experimental study. Elders were randomized into two main groups according to whether they lived alone or with someone. Interactive livestream musical interventions were performed for four weeks, in total eight sessions. The data of the study were collected three times with the Perceived Stress Scale and UCLA Loneliness Scale III in a pretest-posttest-follow-up test design (12th week after the posttest). Significance of difference tests, repeated variance analyses, and strength of influence tests were performed in dependent and independent groups with and without normal distribution.

The online-tool randomization method was utilized to apply simple randomization. Upon identifying the sample, it was initially segregated into two categories: individuals who resided alone and those who did not. The grouping of participants was carried out using an assignment method through a computer program, ensuring equivalence among research groups in terms of gender, stress, and loneliness. Following randomization, conformity of the groups' homogeneity and scales scores to normal distribution were examined with the Shapiro-Wilk test, skewness and kurtosis coefficients, histograms, and Levene's test of homogeneity of variance (p<0,05)

The study aimed to investigate the short and long-term effects of eight sessions of interactive livestreamed classic Turkish music performances on stress and loneliness during Covid-19 pandemic in elderly aged 65 and over who experiencing home isolation. The research hypotheses are as follows:

Perceived stress:

Hypothesis I, H1: Interactive livestream classical Turkish music sessions have a reducing effect on the mean scores of the Perceived Stress Scale.

i. There is a significant difference in the mean scores of the Perceived Stress Scale among intervention groups over time (pre-test, post-test, follow-up).

ii. There is a significant difference in the mean scores of the Perceived Stress Scale between intervention and control groups after the intervention in favor of the intervention group.

Loneliness:

Hypothesis II, H1: Interactive livestream classical Turkish music sessions have a reducing effect on the mean scores of the UCLA Loneliness Scale - III.

i. There is a significant difference in the mean scores of the UCLA Loneliness Scale - III among intervention groups over time (pre-test, post-test, follow-up).

ii. There is a significant difference in the mean scores of the UCLA Loneliness Scale - III between intervention and control groups after the intervention in favor of the intervention group.

For repeated measurements of score averages at different times within the same group, the homogeneity of variances was tested using the Levene Variance Homogeneity Assumption and Mauchly's Sphericity Assumption within the scope of Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance. When homogeneity could not be demonstrated, the Greenhouse-Geisser F value was used. For the control group with two-time measurements, the parametric repeated t-Test (Paired Samples t-Test) was used, assuming normal distribution.

To examine the significance of the difference in independent groups (intervention - control / intergroup) for repeated measurements at different times in assessing the effect size of the intervention, two-way repeated measures ANOVA (factorial ANOVA) was used. Since Mauchly's Sphericity Assumption was not met, the Greenhouse-Geisser F value was used, although the distribution was normal.

In the study, where the statistical significance level was accepted as p<0.05, effect size evaluations were made to test the statistical significance and confirm the practical applicability (in real conditions) of the findings. The effect size of the intervention was examined using partial eta squared (ηp2).

The data collection process was conducted thrice as pretest, posttest, and follow-up. The posttest was performed immediately after the completion of the 4-week intervention, whereas the follow-up measurements were obtained 12 weeks later. To apprise the volunteers about their respective groups and elucidate the application procedure, mobile appointments and virtual meetings were arranged.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Izmır, Turkey, 35040
        • Ege University Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Registered for and attending their first years of lectures
  • Aged higher than 65 year
  • Able to use an interactive social media application via a computer, mobile phone or other electronic devices
  • Participate willingly and voluntarily in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a physical or sensory impairment that would affect the ability to listen to music (e.g., history of temporal brain damage, limb loss, hearing loss, etc.),
  • Have a psychiatric diagnosis that would affect decision-making and orientation assessment abilities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Intervention

Behavioral: Interactive livestreamed classical Turkish music sessions with a professional music band.

The sessions, which lasted approximately one and a half hours, twice a week, have been completed within one month.

The participants attended an interactive livestreamed music performance. In selecting the mode, tempo, and songs to be performed, recommendations were obtained from the Applied Music Therapies Association, and the pieces with copyrighted recordings presented by the Edirne State Turkish Music Ensemble, under the leadership of the General Directorate of Fine Arts of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. As part of the project, examples of traditional Turkish songs were presented to the elderly. The recommended genres and songs consist of vocal and instrumental works belonging to major and minor scales from the Classical Period, which spans from the 14th to the 20th century. In this respect an assembly of eight-musican consisting of five artists playing kanun, tanbur, ney, classical kemençe, and bendir, as well as two vocal soloists performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Perceived Stress Scale (first evaluation with posttest)
Time Frame: Through intervention completion, an average of 1 months
Scale was developed by Cohen, Kamarck, and Mermelstein (1983), and adapted to Turkish culture by Eskin et al. (2013) to determine the potential effects of sample stress and loneliness perception on sociodemographic and musical tendencies. According to the psychometric adaptation study, criterion validity was ensured, with an internal consistency value of .84 and a test-retest reliability of .87. The scale, which consists of 14 items, is interpreted based on the total score and two sub-dimensions (Inadequate self-efficacy perception-ISPE and stress-discomfort perception-SDP). A high total score indicates a high perception of stress, inadequate coping strategies, and ineffective stress management. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.82.
Through intervention completion, an average of 1 months
The UCLA Loneliness Scale III (first evaluation with posttest)
Time Frame: Through intervention completion, an average of 1 months
Scale is a widely used tool for assessing loneliness, which was developed by Russell et al. (1978). The psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale III (UCLA-III) in Turkish culture were first investigated by Demir (1989). In this study, the 3rd revision of the scale developed by Durak and Senol Durak (2010) for Turkish culture was used. The scale consists of 20 items and is rated on a four-point Likert scale (1: Never - 4: Always). The total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness. In similar sample groups, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.91, indicating high psychometric suitability (Kurt 2014). In the context of this study, the Chronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.93.
Through intervention completion, an average of 1 months
The Perceived Stress Scale (second evaluation with follow up)
Time Frame: Through intervention completion, an average of 3 months
Scale was developed by Cohen, Kamarck, and Mermelstein (1983), and adapted to Turkish culture by Eskin et al. (2013) to determine the potential effects of sample stress and loneliness perception on sociodemographic and musical tendencies. According to the psychometric adaptation study, criterion validity was ensured, with an internal consistency value of .84 and a test-retest reliability of .87. The scale, which consists of 14 items, is interpreted based on the total score and two sub-dimensions (Inadequate self-efficacy perception-ISPE and stress-discomfort perception-SDP). A high total score indicates a high perception of stress, inadequate coping strategies, and ineffective stress management. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.82.
Through intervention completion, an average of 3 months
The UCLA Loneliness Scale III (second evaluation with follow up)
Time Frame: Through intervention completion, an average of 3 months
Scale is a widely used tool for assessing loneliness, which was developed by Russell et al. (1978). The psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale III (UCLA-III) in Turkish culture were first investigated by Demir (1989). In this study, the 3rd revision of the scale developed by Durak and Senol Durak (2010) for Turkish culture was used. The scale consists of 20 items and is rated on a four-point Likert scale (1: Never - 4: Always). The total score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness. In similar sample groups, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.91, indicating high psychometric suitability (Kurt 2014). In the context of this study, the Chronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.93.
Through intervention completion, an average of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Public data sharing is applicable to this article. It is planned to publish the research results in a high-impact journal in the field.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Approx 1 year after RCT registration.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Classical Turkish Music Sessions

Subscribe