Colonoscopic Probiotics Spray in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

July 29, 2024 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

The Comparison of the Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic functional disorder of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits without organic disease. IBS is associated with substantial costs to patients, healthcare system and society in terms of increased health care expenditures, loss of work productivity and decrease in quality of life (QoL). Multiple factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of IBS, including disturbed gut microbiota (dysbiosis). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and probiotics administration can manipulate the disturbed intestinal microbiota. According to previous studies, inconsistent efficacy of oral probiotic administration was reported. FMT may have good and lasting efficacy, but the donor selection and route of administration are still issues. Direct delivery of probiotics into the colon by colonoscopy can ensure sufficient microbiota distribution in the colon, so faster and better efficacy may be expected. Therefore, this study is aimed toward validating the efficacy and safety of the colonoscopic probiotics-spray in IBS treatment.

Patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome by Rome IV criteria will be enrolled in this randomized double-blind double-dummy parallel controlled study. The enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to the probiotics-spray (PS) group and the probiotics-oral (PO) group, respectively. The patients in the PS group will receive colonoscopic spray of probiotics once followed by oral placebo for 5 days, while the patients in the PO group will receive colonoscopic spray of placebo once followed by oral probiotics divided into 5 days. Then all of the patients will take the same dose of oral probiotics until 4 weeks. This study will evaluate the efficacy between the PS group and the PO group. Moreover, this study will compare the difference in fecal microbiota changes and safety between these two groups.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic functional disorder of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits without organic disease. The global prevalence of IBS in 2012 was estimated to be 11.2%. The overall incidence of IBS in Taiwan was 106.54 per 10000 population from 2012 to 2018, which is similar to the global prevalence. IBS is associated with substantial costs to patients, healthcare system and society in terms of increased health care expenditures, loss of work productivity and decrease in quality of life (QoL). There is no definite treatment for IBS, and current available treatments are mainly directed at symptom relief.

The cause of IBS is not yet known; however, multiple factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of IBS, such as disturbed gut microbiota (dysbiosis), altered enteroendocrine cells, previous infections, genetics and diet. Treatment guidelines recommend medications focused on IBS symptoms, diets low in fermentable types of oligosaccharides, and the use of probiotics. Probiotics are live microorganisms using in dietary as supplemental products. They have the beneficial effect on gut microenvironment, and may be an effective treatment for global symptoms and abdominal pain in IBS. Probiotics were defined as live microbial feed supplements that benefit the host by improving the intestinal microbial balance. The strains most frequently used as probiotics belong to the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Some probiotics have anti-inflammatory activity while others can modulate visceral hypersensitivity. However, inconsistent efficacy of probiotic administration was reported in the previous literature. Hod K, et al. conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of a probiotic mixture on symptoms and inflammatory markers in women with diarrhea-predominant IBS, but they did not demonstrate superiority of probiotics over placebo. However, some meta-analysis revealed efficacy of probiotics for treatment of IBS. A meta-analysis published in 2020 concluded the RR of IBS symptoms improvement or response with probiotics treatment was 1.52, however, with high heterogeneity. The duration, dose and single or combination of probiotics vary and need to be further evaluated. A review of probiotics in IBS suggests that probiotic supplements have a delayed effect in the improvement of IBS symptoms. Khodadoostan M, et al. conducted a trial to evaluate the effect of probiotic administration immediately and 1 month after colonoscopy in diarrhea-predominant IBS patients, which revealed the use of probiotics had the beneficial effect on IBS symptoms. Furthermore, it can be said that reductions in symptoms and pain in the two treatment groups were not significantly different, but after 6 months of treatment, the effect of probiotics in patients who immediately use it after colonoscopy was more visible and more stable. Niu HL, et al studied the efficacy and safety of probiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome based on 35 randomized controlled trials, which reveals supplementation with a multi-strain probiotic has greater potential to improve IBS symptoms than a single strain, and there is also a trend toward a beneficial effect of Bifidobacterium on global IBS symptoms and pain scores. Therefore, investigators propose a trial to evaluate the efficacy of the use of multi-strain probiotics including Bifidobacterium which is immediately used after colonoscopy for IBS treatment.

It is novel to conduct the study to compare the efficacy and safety of probiotics which are delivered directly via colonoscopy and oral administration. The amount of stool for FMT is 30 to 100 grams; thus, around 1012 to 1013 CFU bacteria will be transplanted in an FMT procedure. In this trial, the investigators will transplant 2x1011 CFU multi-strain probiotics into the colon via colonoscopic spray. Probiotics may be safer than FMT due to minimal risk of transmission of pathogenic organisms. It is also easier to prepare probiotics than feces from a superdonor. If it works, colonoscopic probiotics spray may replace FMT in clinical practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate-to-severe IBS symptoms, as indicated by a score of ≥175 on the IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of immune deficiency or treatment with immune-modulating medication.
  • Pregnant or lactating.
  • Severe psychiatric disorder, or alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Use of probiotics or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: probiotics-spray (PS) group
In the PS group, 1 vial of multi-strain probiotics powder via colonoscopic spray is performed once, followed by five-days of two oral placebo capsules daily. After the five-day treatment, the 2nd fecal sample will be collected. Both groups will receive a 23-day course of oral probiotics (two capsules twice daily) subsequently. The patients were asked to keep a diary to record bowel habits and register any adverse events. The 3rd fecal sample will be collected 28 days after the colonoscopy. The questionnaires will be completed 28 days and 84 days after the colonoscopy to assess responses of treatment. Polyethylene glycol and loperamide were allowed during the intervention as the rescue medication.
Biological: Colonscopic probiotics spray
20g of multi-strain probiotics powder via colonoscopic spray. The probiotic used in this study is SynPro-15G, which has 15 probiotics, including Bacillus coagulans BC1031, Bifidobacterium bifidum BB14, Bifidobacterium breve BR18, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BAL06, Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum) BL986, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA1063, Lactobacillus casei LC122, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis LDL114, Lactobacillus fermentum LF26, Lactobacillus helveticus LH43, Lactobacillus paracasei LPC12, Lactobacillus plantarum LP198, Lactobacillus reuteri LR21, Lactobacillus rhamnosus LRH10, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST37 at a concentration of 2x1010 CFU/g (Synbiotech Corp., Kaohsiung, Taiwan). SynPro-15G is made either as a vial of powder (2x1011 CFU /vial) for colonoscopic spray or as a capsule (2x1010 CFU/capsule) for oral intake.
Active Comparator: probiotics-oral (PO) group
In the PO group, 1 vial of placebo powder via colonoscopic spray is performed once, followed by five-days of two oral probiotics capsules daily. After the five-day treatment, the 2nd fecal sample will be collected. Both groups will receive a 23-day course of oral probiotics (two capsules twice daily) subsequently. The patients were asked to keep a diary to record bowel habits and register any adverse events. The 3rd fecal sample will be collected 28 days after the colonoscopy. The questionnaires will be completed 28 days and 84 days after the colonoscopy to assess responses of treatment. Polyethylene glycol and loperamide were allowed during the intervention as the rescue medication.
Biological: Colonscopic probiotics spray
20g of multi-strain probiotics powder via colonoscopic spray. The probiotic used in this study is SynPro-15G, which has 15 probiotics, including Bacillus coagulans BC1031, Bifidobacterium bifidum BB14, Bifidobacterium breve BR18, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BAL06, Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum) BL986, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA1063, Lactobacillus casei LC122, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis LDL114, Lactobacillus fermentum LF26, Lactobacillus helveticus LH43, Lactobacillus paracasei LPC12, Lactobacillus plantarum LP198, Lactobacillus reuteri LR21, Lactobacillus rhamnosus LRH10, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST37 at a concentration of 2x1010 CFU/g (Synbiotech Corp., Kaohsiung, Taiwan). SynPro-15G is made either as a vial of powder (2x1011 CFU /vial) for colonoscopic spray or as a capsule (2x1010 CFU/capsule) for oral intake.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A change in the IBS-SSS total score of ≥50 points
Time Frame: 84 days
The primary endpoint is a reduction in the IBS-SSS total score of ≥50 points .Abdominal symptoms are assessed on Day 0, Day 5, Day 28 and Day 84 using the IBS-SSS questionnaires. Patients whose total IBS- SSS score decreased by ≥50 points after the intervention are considered responders. A decrease of ≥175 points in the IBS- SSS total score considered to indicate significant clinical improvements.
84 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The preservation of probiotics following intervention
Time Frame: 28 days
The investigators will evaluate the gut microbiota by fecal qPCR in the PS group and PO group, respectively, on Day 0, Day 5 and Day 28. The investigators will also compare the relative abundance of target probiotics between the two study groups, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, or others.
28 days
The change of fecal microbiota following intervention
Time Frame: 28 days
The investigators will evaluate the gut microbiota by fecal qPCR in the PS group and PO group, respectively, on Day 0, Day 5 and Day 28. The investigators will compare the distribution of gut microbiota between D0, D5, and D28
28 days
A reduction in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 84 days
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) are also used to assess the presence of anxiety and depression. HADS scale will be recorded on day 0 and day 84.
84 days
A reduction in Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)
Time Frame: 84 days
Fatigue is measured using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). A decrease of ≥4 points in the FAS score are considered to indicate significant clinical improvements. FAS will be recorded on day 0 and day 84.
84 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A BR 111 0 47

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After study completed and paper accepted

IPD Sharing Time Frame

10 years

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Effect of Drug

Clinical Trials on Colonscopic probiotics spray

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Greece

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe