Effect of a Dietary Iron Program on Iron Status and IQ in Children in Phatthalung Province, Thailand

May 18, 2023 updated by: Mahidol University

The Effects of a Dietary Iron Program on Iron Status and Cognitive Function Amoung School Children in Phatthalung Province, Southern Thailand

Iron deficiency (ID) continues to be one of the most prevalent disorders, which can adversely affect cognitive ability in childhood. Our aim was to determine the effect of a dietary iron education program (DIP) on children's iron status and intelligence quotient (IQ) score. This pre-test (week 1) post-test (week 16) quasi-experimental study with follow-up (week 18) utilized constructs from the Health Belief Model. Children and caregivers participated in the DIP which incorporated group talks, presentations, brainstorming, game-based learning and cooking sessions from weeks 2-15. Knowledge of ID and dietary iron, perceived susceptibility and severity, benefits and barriers for changing behavior, dietary intake, iron status and IQ score were determined at all timepoints (weeks 1, 16, and 18).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether an education-based dietary iron program that involved school teachers, parents and children could increase iron status and intelligence quotient (IQ) score in a group of schoolchildren.
  2. Methods

2.1 Study design A quasi-experimental study (pre-test post-test design with follow-up) was used in this study that was based on the Health Belief Model as its theoretical framework.

2.2 Study Setting and Participants Child-parent/caregiver dyads were recruited from one purposively selected government-administered primary school in Phatthalung province. Schools were not involved in any other programs, located in a rural area, and had at least 200 children studying in grades 4-5. Hookworm screening was done 6 weeks before program implementation by the local government screening program. All children who were studying in grades 4-5 in the selected school were invited to participate. Out of 190 children, 34 children who were mildly anemic were enrolled in the study, together with their parents/caregivers. Sample size was calculated based on serum ferritin concentrations among school-aged children from a study by Rahman et al. [17]. Informed written consent was obtained from child-parent/caregiver dyads prior to program implementation.

2.3 Procedure for the intervention The Health Belief Model underpinned the development of the dietary iron program, which focused on the importance of adequate dietary iron consumption and emphasized prevention of iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). It was implemented from weeks 2 to 15 of the study. Child-parent/caregiver dyads and teachers received an ID/IDA booklet that included information about anemia, causes of ID, iron-rich food, iron concentration in traditional foods, dietary enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption, and recipes for iron-rich local and culturally appropriate meals for teachers, parents/caregivers and children, as part of the dietary iron program.

Teachers who were involved in school lunch design participated for discussing and planning iron-rich school lunch menus, and observed teaching and learning process with the use of media and games during the iron lessons for children. Four lessons were conducted for parents/caregivers. The first lesson was discussion that addressed parental perceptions about children's susceptibility to ID and IDA and the severity of ID and IDA concerning cognitive function. In the second lesson, parents/caregivers were asked to list the benefits and barriers for changing behavior with regards to preparing more iron-rich foods in the home. Then, the principal researcher invited parents/caregivers to brainstorm and share ways to overcome these barriers. Cooking classes for preparing iron-rich meals at home were conducted. Parents/caregivers voted for two iron-rich meals that they wanted to cook and then they prepared and cooked them in the classes. For the final lesson, the principal researcher visited each parent/caregiver to discuss the barriers they faced when trying to incorporate more iron-rich meals into their child's diet at home. Three lessons were conducted for the children, one per month. In the first lesson, group talks and games were used to engage the children about the causes and effects of ID and IDA. The second lesson focused on iron-rich food. After that, the children partook in games that entailed writing names of food ingredients that contained iron and circling pictures of iron-rich foods, and describing the sensations associated with consuming these foods. Both positive and negative answers from children were selected for discussion, and approaches for consuming more iron-rich food were brainstormed. A market assignment was set to help the children remember the names of iron-rich food and recognize the foods when they visited a market with their parents. The last lesson was a cooking class. After each cooking class finished, the researcher and a teacher encouraged them to eat this meal together.

2.4 Measurement outcomes The main outcome for this study was the effect of an education-based dietary iron program on iron status and intelligence quotient (IQ) score among children before program implementation (week 1) and at week 16 (immediately after program implementation) and at 18 weeks (follow-up appointment to determine the sustainability of the intervention). All of the outcome variables were measured at different time points. Children's knowledge towards ID and IDA was determined using a questionnaire, while children's iron intake was estimated by using three days of 24-hour recalls (2 school days and 1 weekend day). Portion sizes were estimated by using household portion sizes (rice-serving spoon, tablespoon, teaspoon and glass). IQ score was measured by a trained child psychologist by using the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) parallel version. Iron status was determined from blood samples drawn by medical technologists in the first-aid rooms. Concentration of hemoglobin, serum ferritin and serum C-reactive protein were measured by laboratory staff at hematology laboratory at N-health laboratory, Bangkok Dusit Medical Service Hospital (BDMS), Songkla province, using the hemoglobin assay kit (Colorimetric), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CMIA) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methods, respectively. Iron status was defined iron-replete: hemoglobin >115 g/l and serum ferritin level > 30 µg/l; anemia: hemoglobin <115 g/l and serum ferritin level >30 µg/l; mild-moderate iron depletion with anemia: hemoglobin 80-114 g/l and serum ferritin level <30 µg/l.; mild iron depletion without anemia: serum ferritin level < 30 µg/l and hemoglobin>115 g/l. In addition, parents/caregivers were assessed by using a questionnaire toward knowledge and perceptions consisted of perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and barriers in relation to ID and IDA.

2.5 Data Analysis Data from questionnaires were recorded using EpiData version 3.1, while 24-hour dietary recall data were entered into INMUCAL V3, which is a nutrient composition database of dietary items commonly consumed in Thailand. Portion sizes were converted into grams before entering data, and energy and nutrient intakes were calculated. Statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS version 18. Frequencies, percentage, mean (SD) and median (25th-75th percentile) were calculated for demographic characteristics of participant knowledge, perceptions, iron intake, iron status, and IQ score. The One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA and Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks were used to compare mean differences in knowledge score and perception score of IDA and ID prevention among parents/caregivers, total iron intake, heme iron intake, non-heme iron intake, iron status and IQ score among children at different time points. The Monte Carlo exact test was used to compare the number of children in grades 4-5 who met/did not meet the Thai DRI for iron at pre-test, post-test and follow-up. Differences were considered to be significantly different when p<0.05.

2.6 Ethical approval The study was granted ethical approval by the Committee of the Ethical Review for Human Research, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University Thailand 9 March 2018 (COA. No. MUPH 2018-048).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Phattalung Province
      • Phattalung, Phattalung Province, Thailand, 93210
        • Ms Witchada Simla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children who were studying in grades 4 and 5 of the selected school

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe illness, including severe anemia (hemoglobin <4.96 mmol/L or <80 g/L)
  • Post-menarche
  • Use of vitamin or mineral supplements up to 30 days before program implementation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dietary Iron Program
The dietary iron program was administered from weeks 2 to 15 in between pre-test and post-test measurements

Teachers Lesson 1: Discuss about causes, prevention and effects of anemia and ID, dietary iron, dietary enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption, and school lunch menu Lesson 2: Participate in and observe how to teach children in an iron curriculum

Caregivers Lesson 1: Presentation and group talk about causes, prevention, and effects of anemia and ID, dietary iron, and dietary enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption Lesson 2: Discuss benefits and barriers of changing to an iron-rich meal at home Lesson 3: Cooking class for preparing an iron-rich meal at home (2 times) Lesson 4: Home visit

Children Lesson 1: Group talk about causes and effects of anemia and ID Games: "Where are you from?" Lesson 2: Presentation and group talk about dietary iron, and dietary enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption, and iron-rich food Games: "What is the winner?" Assignment: Market assignment Lesson 3: Cooking class (2 times)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Iron Status
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to post-test (week 16), and change from post-test (week 16) to follow-up (week 18)
For outcome 1, individuals were categorized as either: (1.) iron replete, (2.) Iron deficient, (3.) Iron deficient with mild-moderate anemia (4.) mild-moderately anemic
Change from baseline (week 1) to post-test (week 16), and change from post-test (week 16) to follow-up (week 18)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intelligence quotient (IQ) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to post-test (week 16), and change from post-test (week 16) to follow-up (week 18)
Outcome 2 was measured as the number of IQ points (continuous data)
Change from baseline (week 1) to post-test (week 16), and change from post-test (week 16) to follow-up (week 18)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Witchada Simla, MSc, Thaksin University (Phatthalung Campus), Thailand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IDP will not be shared with researchers outside of the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron Deficiency, Anaemia in Children

Clinical Trials on Dietary Iron Program

Subscribe