Cervical Spine Strengthening Exercises Versus Kendall Exercises in Patients With Forward Head Posture.

December 26, 2023 updated by: Riphah International University

Targeted Cervical Spine Strengthening Exercises Versus Kendall Exercises in Patients With Forward Head Posture.

To compare the effects of targeted cervical spine strengthening exercises and Kendall exercise in patients with forward head posture

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Studies have evaluated the effect of Kendall's exercises and found it effective for recovery. Studies have also concluded that targeted strengthening of flexors reverse the symptoms. The purpose of this study will elaborate either there is a difference in time taken to achieve normal head alignment between a targeted muscle that is prone to weakness or a technique that involves strengthening of weakened muscle plus stretching of shortened muscles. As there is a vast variety of correcting exercise program in the literature, the decision to choose the best option may be challenging. This study may help physiotherapists to apply treatment that is directly directing the main culprit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • The Bank of Punjab, Lahore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders
  • Age 20-40 years with no signs of degeneration.
  • Individuals having cranio-vertebral angle less than 50
  • Those who have not gone under rehabilitation for last 6 months
  • Those who are computer users for more than 3 hours a day or more.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal trauma
  • Musculoskeletal abnormality in the cervical spine
  • Rheumatologic disorders
  • Any bony or soft tissue systemic disease
  • Congenital defects
  • Disc pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cervical spine strengthening group

The participant will nod and chin tuck the head against the block with bands supporting the movement.

An air-filled pressure cushion is placed under the occiput behind the cervical spine and conforms to the subject's shape. With a head nod, the pressure on the cuff increases and is shown by the dial. 10 repetitions of 5 seconds hold will be performed for 8 weeks and strength is measured by sphygmomanometer

sole effect of cervical spine strengthening will be analyzed
Active Comparator: Kendall exercise group
patient is seated and the exercises are performed which include stretching pectoralis muscle, placing both hands on the occipital area and pulling the elbows back up and performing arm abduction and external rotation; and (2) strengthening shoulder retraction, Strengthening the deep cervical flexors and Stretching the cervical extensors
comparative effect of targeted cervical spine strengthening versus kendalls exercise will be analyzed
Other Names:
  • cervical spine strengthening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in NPRS
Time Frame: 8th week
Pain intensity will be assessed by numeric pain rating scale NPRS. The 11-point NPRS (intervals from 0-10) is used to quantify pain intensity; 0 represents no pain, and 10 represent the worst possible agony. The NPRS is a valid and reliable instrument for older persons. Participants will be asked to select the number that most accurately describes their level of pain. At the baseline assessment, following each exercise session during the 8-week intervention, and finally at the end of the intervention Programmed, the NPRS scores will be recorded Changes from Basline to 8th week
8th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: 8th week

A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. The long arm goniometers are more accurate for joints with long levers like the knee and hip joints. A universal goniometer has three parts. A body: It is designed like a protractor and may form a full or a half-circle. It has a scale for the measurement of the angle. The scale can extend either from 0 to 180 degrees or 180 to 0 degrees. A fulcrum: The screw-like device can be tightened to fix the moving arm in a particular position or loosened to permit free movement. The moving arm is the arm of the goniometer, which aligns with the mobile part of the joint measured.

Changes from Basline to 8th week

8th week

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
neck disability index
Time Frame: 8th week
The neck disability index NDI has become a standard instrument for measuring self-rated disability due to neck pain. Each of the 10 items scores from 0 to 5. The maximum score is 50 Changes from Basline to 8th week
8th week
Photogrammetry
Time Frame: 8th week
It is used for postural evaluation. Most common way to find forward head posture is y measuring craniovertebral angle. Photos were taken from patients' right side and analysis is done by using ImageJ software Changes from Basline to 8th week
8th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rabiya Noor, PhD, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/RCR & AHS/23/0120

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Forward Head Posture

Clinical Trials on cervical spine strengthening

Subscribe