Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Strength in Subacute Stroke

January 18, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Stimulation on Strength in Subacute Stroke

Loss of strength is a common complication post stroke which leads to loss of balance and walking ability. Variety of interventions are adopted to improve muscle strength after stroke. These include progressive resistance training, specific task training or functional training, functional electrical stimulation and high intensity aerobic exercises

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) is a relatively new treatment approach for stroke recovery. TDCS is a neuromodulation method which involves application of weak direct current stimulations over the scalp via electrodes. It could induce plasticity via modulation of resting membrane potential and modification of spontaneous discharge rate.

TDCS has been shown to have beneficial effects on mobility, muscle strength, motor learning, lower limb function, balance, gait, functionality and walking ability in post stroke patients. TDCS appears to be a promising intervention for stroke patients however its effects are not significant if used in isolation. Thus, it should be used as an adjunct to some other treatment.

Review of available literature indicates TDCS can be a good option in short and intermediate run but its effects in the long run have not been studied yet. Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge there is little literature available about the long-term effects of TDCS on muscle strength in subacute stage. Therefore, this study is designed to test the long-term effects of TDCS stimulation on subacute stroke patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KPK
      • Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
        • Rafsan Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subacute and first MCA stroke
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Medium to high fall risk on BBS (BBS score ≤ 40)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing and Visual loss/deficit
  • Recurrent CVA
  • Neurological condition affecting balance like Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson disease etc
  • Wound at skull
  • Presence of shunt and/or metallic implant at cranial region
  • Brain tumors
  • Musculoskeletal conditions affecting lower limbs
  • Cognitively compromised

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
receive Anodal TDCS with spongy electrodes applied to the M1 (supplementary motor area) of the skull which corresponds to C3 and C4 on the 10/20 EEG system. The intensity of TDCS will be 2.5 mA and the duration will be 20 mints. The intervention will be applied twice a day with a time difference of 30 minutes between the two sessions.
The intensity of TDCS will be 2.5 mA and the duration will be 20 mints. The intervention will be applied twice a day with a time difference of 30 minutes between the two sessions.
Sham Comparator: Group B
receive conventional treatment in the form of motor relearning program (MRP). And Sham application of anodal TDCS
The intensity of TDCS will be 2.5 mA and the duration will be 20 mints. The intervention will be applied twice a day with a time difference of 30 minutes between the two sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manual muscle testing
Time Frame: 8th week
MMT is used to determine the extent and degree of muscular weakness resulting from disease, injury or disuse. It is an important part of assessment in many patient groups including patients with stroke, spinal cord injury, neuropathy and other neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. The patient can be scored by 5 grades where grade 5 is the patient completes full ROM against maximum resistance from therapist, grade 4 is patient completes full ROM against moderate resistance, grade 3 is patient completes full ROM against gravity, grade 2 is completion of ROM with gravity eliminated, grade 1 is flickering of muscles when movement is attempted and grade 0 is when there is no palpable contraction or flickering. A review on the validity and reliability of MMT reported ICC values of up to 0.96 suggesting it is a reasonably valid tool to assess muscle strength The assessment will be made at baseline, fourth and eighth week
8th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 8th week
BBS is used to objectively determine a patient's ability to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five point scale ranging from 0 to 4, 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 indicating the highest level of function. The maximum score is 56 indicating normal function. A score of 41 to 56 indicates mild risk fall, 21 to 40 indicates medium risk fall and 0 to 20 indicates high risk fall. A study on various scales used for assessing balance and function has reported ICC values of 0.99 The assessment will be made at baseline, fourth and eighth week.
8th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Subscribe