Implementing a Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Program in Primary Care (MonitorBP)

November 6, 2023 updated by: Ian Kronish, Columbia University

Implementing a Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Program to Improve Hypertension Control in a Primary Care Network: the MonitorBP Cluster Randomized Trial

The goal of this research is to determine whether a theory-informed implementation strategy is successful at increasing the uptake of a supported home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) program as well as to determine the effectiveness of this evidence-based practice when implemented across multiple practices serving a diverse patient population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypertension guidelines now strongly recommend that patients with hypertension monitor their blood pressure (BP) at home (i.e., home BP monitoring; HBPM) as an approach to improving BP control so long as HBPM is conducted with clinical support (i.e., supported HBPM). Yet, few health systems have systematically implemented HBPM programs, and less than 20% of hypertensive patients routinely measure their BP at home, resulting in a gap in the translation of evidence-based recommendations into practice.

While there is strong evidence for Supported HBPM from pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the evidence has been generated from the subgroup of patients and clinicians who volunteered to participate in trials, and the sample sizes have been in the hundreds of patients. There remains a gap in assessing the effectiveness of a scaled-up HBPM program that seeks to maximize the enrollment of primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Accordingly, in partnership with health system leaders at New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and Weill Cornell Medicine, the study investigator leveraged a system-wide investment in telemedicine to develop a telemonitoring-enabled Supported HBPM program. The Supported HBPM program consists of two options for obtaining electronic health record (EHR)-integrated home BP data. The low resource intensity option is designed for patients that can obtain valid home BP devices and are comfortable using the patient portal. It includes digital support to prompt patients to track their home BP readings in the patient portal using their own BP devices with automated triage support for extreme readings. The high resource intensity option is designed for patients that need additional support with HBPM. It involves navigator support with obtaining and using loaned home BP devices that wirelessly transmit data into the EHR and nursing support to triage extreme readings. Both programs can be ordered by clinicians in the EHR and both provide clinicians with weekly summaries of home BP readings with average home BP already calculated.

The study investigator concurrently followed a theory-driven process (the Behavior Change Wheel) to develop an implementation strategy aimed at increasing uptake of the Supported HBPM program. The study investigator now plans to implement and evaluate the Supported HBPM program across practices in the NYP, Weill Cornell Medicine, and ColumbiaDoctors primary care network which is comprised of a socioeconomically diverse patient population.

The study will evaluate the program by conducting a parallel-group cluster randomized trial in which 15 practices will be matched and then randomly assigned to early implementation of the Supported HBPM program (intervention) versus usual care with delayed implementation (i.e., wait-list control). Data will be retrospectively collected from a 12 month period before implementation (pre-implementation periods) as well as from a 12 month period after implementation (post-implementation period) to assess outcomes.

If successful, this project will provide a roadmap for widely implementing an EHR-integrated Supported HBPM program, and will accelerate a change in the paradigm of hypertension management from the office to the home.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

16000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Maria-Jose Lopez-Sanchez, MPH
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ian Kronish, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient-level

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertension (as per International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-10 codes)
  • At least one completed primary care office visit during relevant 6-month pre implementation or post-implementation study time period
  • Age 18-85 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced dementia or other measure of frailty (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Pregnancy during measurement period (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Stage 5 or end-stage kidney disease (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Terminal illness/in hospice care (as per ICD-10 codes)

Practice-level

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care practice that provides care to adult patients affiliated with New York Presbyterian's Ambulatory Care Network, ColumbiaDoctors, or Weill Cornell Medicine, including practices that specialize in HIV medicine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical director declines participation in the trial
  • Site for pilot testing the supported HBPM program or its implementation strategy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Clinics, Pre-Implementation Period
Usual care
Usual care
Other: Control Clinics, Pre-Implementation Period
Usual care
Usual care
Other: Control Clinics, Post-Implementation Period
Usual care
Usual care
Experimental: Intervention Clinics, Post-Implementation Period
Access to Supported HBPM program plus a multifaceted implementation strategy designed to increase uptake of the program by primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension

Supported HBPM Program:

  • Patients are loaned a wireless home BP device or use their own device
  • Navigator or app support for onboarding and engaging patients in HBPM
  • Nursing or app support for monitoring and triaging home BP data for extreme readings
  • EHR integration of order for program and home BP data, with weekly feedback of home BP results to clinicians within the EHR

Multifaceted implementation strategy:

  • Clinician education about the benefits of the program as well as training in how to refer and manage patients who are enrolled
  • Prompts and reminders to increase clinician referrals
  • Instructional materials for patients and clinicians
  • Problem-solving meetings to tailor implementation for individual practices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient's office systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in patient's office systolic blood pressure (SBP) from index visit to last visit during the subsequent 12 months, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the index visit
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Office diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in patient's office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from index visit to last visit during the subsequent 12 months, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the index visit
12 months
Change in patient's antihypertensive medication regimen intensity
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in patient's antihypertensive medication regimen intensity as calculated by the Therapeutic Intensity Score from index visit to last visit during the subsequent 12 months, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the index visit
12 months
Antihypertensive medication adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of days covered by antihypertensive medications during the last 6 months of the 12-month follow-up period, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the index visit. Antihypertensive medication adherence will be calculated for each prescribed class of medication and then averaged across all classes.
12 months
Uncontrolled hypertension
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients whose last office BP during the 12-month follow-up period was SBP>= 140 mmHg or DBP >= 90 mmHg, among all eligible patients
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian Kronish, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A de-identified data archive that contains raw study data will be posted on an open science platform.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of major study activities.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the data archive will be provided upon request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe