Neurologic Deficits and Recovery in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

April 28, 2025 updated by: University of New Mexico
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common problems treated by neurosurgeons, particularly as the population ages. While often dismissed as a benign problem, it has become clear that cSDH is associated with worse long term functional and cognitive outcomes compared to matched controls. Though surgical techniques for treatment of cSDH are becoming more effective and safe, a persisting problem of fluctuating, stroke-like neurological deficits has re-emerged. Such deficits are not always directly related to hematoma mass effect and not always relieved with surgical decompression, but can result in prolonged hospital course, additional workup, and sometimes even additional invasive treatments. While the cause of such events is unknown, we recently documented for the first time that massive waves of spreading depolarization can occur in these patients and were closely linked to such neurologic deficits in some patients. In the current study, we plan to expand on these preliminary findings with rigorous, standardized application of post operative subdural electrocorticography monitoring, pioneered at our institution to detect SD. We also plan to build on our large retrospective analysis estimating the overall incidence of such deficits in cSDH patients by assessing multiple proposed risk factors for SD. In addition, for the first time, we will assess the short- and long-term consequences of cSDH and SD with detailed functional, cognitive, and headache related outcome measurement. These assessments are based on several remarkable cases we have observed with time-locked neurologic deterioration associated with recurrent SD. This study qualifies as a mechanistic clinical trial in that we will be prospectively assigning patients to the intervention of SD monitoring and assessing outcomes related to the occurrence of SD. This constitutes the application of a novel measure of brain signaling and assessing biomarkers of these physiologic processes of SD. These studies will provide critically needed information on this novel mechanism for neurologic deficits and worse outcomes after cSDH evacuation. Upon successful completion, we would identify a targetable mechanism for poor outcomes that occur commonly in patients with cSDH. This overall strategy offers the opportunity to radically improve the care of patients with cSDH by focusing on clinical trials of pharmacologic therapies for neurologic deficits in patients with cSDH.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic/ subacute subdural hematoma deemed necessary for surgical evacuation,
  • Ability to consent or have LAR consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergent need for evacuation,
  • acute traumatic subdural hematoma, and
  • severe baseline disability (mRS>2) (modified Rankin Scale)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ECoG monitoring
Patients undergoing standard of care surgical evacuation of cSDH. will have subdural ECoG monitoring electrode placed crossing frontal and temporal lobes for 1-5 days of post operative monitoring. All subjects will undergo long term followup testing.
Brief (1-5 days) of post operative ECoG monitoring to detect spreading depolarization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative neurologic deterioration.
Time Frame: 1-5 days
Incidence of decline in Markwalder grading scale (0[normal]-4[comatose]) or Glasgow coma scale (3[no response] to 15[normal]) by one point.
1-5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
eGOS
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
Extended Glasgow outcome scale 1(dead)- 8(upper good recovery)
30day, 90 day, 180 day
MoCA
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (1-30) 30 is the best
30day, 90 day, 180 day
NIH toolbox cognitive battery
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
The NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery provides an overall summary score along with fluid and crystallized cognition summary scores.
30day, 90 day, 180 day
PROMIS 29 profile
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain
30day, 90 day, 180 day
TBI QOL
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
The TBI-QOL consists of 20 independent calibrated item banks and 2 uncalibrated scales that measure physical, emotional, cognitive, and social aspects of health-related quality of life
30day, 90 day, 180 day
Headache disability Index
Time Frame: 30day, 90 day, 180 day
The Headache Disability Index (HDI) is a 27-item questionnaire.The first two questions asks the patient to identify the frequency (1 per month; more than 1 but less than 4 per month; more than 1 per week) and intensity (mild, moderate, severe) of their headache. The remaining questions evaluate quality of life issues to determine headache disability.
30day, 90 day, 180 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Clinical Trials on ECoG monitoring

Subscribe