- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05900778
Implementation of a HABIT-ILE Intervention at William Lennox Neurological Hospital (NeuREHA) (NeuREHA)
Implementation of a HABIT-ILE Intervention at William Lennox Neurological : a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim is to investigate, for the first time, the effectiveness of HABIT-ILE therapy in a hospital setting in the treatment of a population representative of the clinical population with children with acquired brain injuries.
The hypothesis is that an in-hospital HABIT-ILE protocol will be more effective than conventional therapies usually given to children with acquired brain injury, and that this difference will be objectively demonstrated by clinical assessments of motor function, cognition and participation conducted before and after treatment periods.
The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate the effect of intensive bimanual hand-arm therapy including the lower extremities (HABIT-ILE) on body functions and structures, activity and participation in children with acquired brain injury.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Yannick Bleyenheuft, Professor
- Phone Number: +32 2 764 93 49
- Email: yannick.bleyenheuft@uclouvain.be
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Julie Paradis, Doctor
- Phone Number: +32 489 28 12 50
- Email: julie.paradis@vinci.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1200
- Recruiting
- Institute of Neurosciences, UCLouvain
-
Contact:
- Yannick Bleyenheuft, Professor
- Phone Number: +32 2 764 93 49
- Email: yannick.bleyenheuft@uclouvain.be
-
Contact:
- Julie Paradis
- Phone Number: +32 489 28 12 50
- Email: julie.paradis@vinci.be
-
Bruxelles, Belgium
- Recruiting
- Spontaneous contact via doctors or other partners
-
Contact:
- anne Klocker, PhD
- Email: anne.klocker@vinci.be
-
-
Brabant-Wallon
-
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Brabant-Wallon, Belgium, 1340
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalier Neurologique William Lennox
-
Contact:
- anne Klocker, PhD
- Email: anne.klocker@vinci.be
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- children with acquired brain injury of school
- age 5 to 18 years inclusive
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable seizure
- programmed botulinum toxin or orthopedic surgery in the 6 months previous to the intervention, during intervention period or 3months after the intervention time
- Severe visual or cognitive impairments likely to interfere with intervention or testing session completion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional intervention
Conventional physical and occupational therapy
|
2 weeks usual intervention (waitlist group)
|
|
Experimental: HABIT-ILE
Hand and arm bimanuel intensive therapy including lowers extremities
|
2 weeks HABIT-ILE
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM 66)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The GMFM has been developed to measure the change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Flanker task
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Cognitive functions of the children will be assessed by Flanker task.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in isometric muscular strength (Jamar)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
A quantitative and objective measure of isometric muscular strength of hand and forearm.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in unimanual dexterity: Box and Blocks test (BBT)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The BBT is a test of gross manual dexterity.
Each hand is tested individually and the BBT is scored through the number of blocks carried over the partition from one part to another part of a box during the one-minute trial period.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes on bimanual function (Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA))
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Developed to observe the efficacy of the assisting hand use, in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (scored in percentage), during bimanual activities for the randomized controlled trial
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in 6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The 6 Minutes Walking Test measures the distance that the patient walk as much as possible within a period of 6-minutes in a 30 meters long corridor.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in Pediatric balance scale (PBS)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
A 14-item criterion-referencekd measure that examines functional balance in the context of everyday tasks in the pediatric population.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
This is an interview-setting designed to capture a patient's self-perception of performance and satisfaction of it in everyday activities, observed over time.
During the interview, parents set up 5 activities considered difficult in daily life.
These are then assessed, in a 1 to 10 scale, regarding the child's self-perception of performance and satisfaction of it.
The total score is the average of the scores for perception and satisfaction separately (score from 1 to 10; higher score means better performance/satisfaction)
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaire
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
This parent's filled questionnaire measures a patient's ability to perform daily activities requiring the use of the upper and/or the lower extremities through 43 items specific to patients with cerebral palsy.
It ranges from - 7 to +7 logits (higher score means better performance).
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The PEDI-CAT is the new version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI).
The PEDI-CAT is comprised of 276 functional activities acquired throughout infancy, childhood and young adulthood.
Based on the nternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY) model, the PEDI-CAT contents provide information about the activities and participation component.
It ranges from 0 to 100% (higher score means better performance).
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in Pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory is a brief measure of health-related quality of life in children and young people.
The measure can be completed by parents (the Proxy Report) as well as children and young people (the Self-Report).
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Changes in Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Assesses the parents' perceptions of the care they and their children receive from children's rehabilitation treatment centres. Using a 8-point response scale, parents answer to 20 questions, indicating to what extent they have experienced the events or the situations described. A score of 7 means that they have experienced this aspect to a very great extent, or most of the time. A score of 1 means that they have not experienced this aspect at all. A score of 0 means that the question does not apply to them. There is no total score. However, because the statements are positively worded, higher total scores indicates that needs of the parents are being met to a great extent. |
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Status in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Non verbal short version (WISC)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline)
|
This is a validated assessment for children aged 4 and over, with subtests such as object assembly, recognition, picture arrangement and fluid reasoning.
The brief 15-20 minute version will be used.
Scores are given for the full battery and for the subtests (subtest T-scores and percentile ranks).
|
T0 (baseline)
|
|
Classification du niveau moteur: The Gross Motor Function Classification System - Expanded & Revised (GMFCS - E&R)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline)
|
The Gross Motor Function Classification System - Expanded & Revised (GMFCS - E&R) is a 5-level classification system that describes the gross motor function of children and youth on the basis of their self-initiated movement with particular emphasis on sitting, walking, and wheeled mobility.
|
T0 (baseline)
|
|
QUALITY OF LIFE : KIDSCREEN 10
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
The Gross Motor Function Classification System - Expanded & Revised (GMFCS - E&R)
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
|
Stroop task
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Executive functions of the children will be assessed by Stroop task.
|
T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2weeks intervention), T2(3 months follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yannick Bleyenheuft, Professor, Insititue of Neurosciences, UCLouvain
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B0392023000044
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acquired Brain Injury
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Acquired Brain InjuryUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Acquired Brain InjuryUnited States
-
Universidade da CoruñaNot yet recruitingAcquired Brain Injury
-
University of ValenciaTerminated
-
Universidade da CoruñaActive, not recruitingAcquired Brain InjurySpain
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedAcquired Brain InjuryUnited States
-
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaRegione Lombardia; National Research Council of ItalyCompletedAcquired Brain InjuryItaly
-
Hopitaux de Saint-MauriceInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Ministry... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of SalfordCompletedAcquired Brain InjuryUnited Kingdom
-
University of ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre Foundation, ManitobaCompletedAcquired Brain InjuryCanada
Clinical Trials on HABIT-ILE
-
Université Catholique de LouvainNot yet recruiting
-
Université Catholique de LouvainRecruiting
-
Université Catholique de LouvainCompletedCerebral PalsyBelgium
-
Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenTeachers College, Columbia UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsyUnited States
-
Universidad Europea de MadridNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital of Mont-GodinneUniversité Catholique de LouvainUnknownBimanual Training in Children With Hemiplegia With Lower Limb and Postural Stimulation (HABIT & Leg)Congenital HemiplegiaBelgium
-
Université Catholique de LouvainCompletedCerebral PalsyBelgium
-
Université Catholique de LouvainUniversity of Pisa; University Hospital, Angers; University of the Balearic Islands and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCerebral PalsyFrance, Belgium, Italy
-
Université Catholique de LouvainRecruiting
-
Université Catholique de LouvainRecruitingCerebral PalsyBelgium