Identifying Predictors Of Response To Mepolizumab In CRSwNP (ISS-RESMEPO)

Identifying Predictors Of Long-Lasting Response To Mepolizumab In CRSwNP: Is The Disease-Modifying Role Secondary To Restored Anti-Viral Activity Or Enhanced Epithelial Regeneration?

The investigators propose a real-world study to assess the mechanism of action of long-lasting response to mepolizumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and identify clinically useful predictors of response.

Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-5 and is approved for use in asthma and CRSwNP. In clinical studies, 12 months of treatment with mepolizumab improved signs and symptoms of CRSwNP and reduced the need for surgery. While several biologic medications targeting facets of the Type 2 mechanism are currently indicated for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps mepolizumab alone appears capable of modifying the disease's biological behaviour and producing long-standing improvements after the cessation of treatment. In the mepolizumab for CRSwNP regulatory trial (SYNAPSE), a subset of patients experienced dramatic and long-lasting, which is over 48 months after cessation of administration of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) in our experience. This has been partially captured in a follow-on study to the registration trail, which showed that a subset of patients followed for 24 weeks after cessation of biologic therapy (with continued use of mometasone furoate) demonstrated persistent improvements over baseline.

However, the mechanism of the long-lasting effect in a subset of patients is not well understood, and it is impossible currently to identify patients who will derive this maximal benefit. The mechanism for the prolonged improvements in CRSwNP seen in certain patients with mepolizumab remains to be established but suggests that effects beyond eosinophil trafficking are implicated.

The investigators believe that mepolizumab has IL-5-mediated pleiotropic effects which contribute to disease modification with effects extending beyond eosinophil activation and trafficking. This may include the following primary or secondary effects:

i) Improving epithelial barrier function ii) Altering mast cell dynamics iii) Reversing epigenetic modifications iv) Altering the immune response to better clear pathogenic bacteria or viruses.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Rationale:

The investigators propose an ambitious research program to investigate the underlying mechanism of action of the prolonged responses to treatment with mepolizumab in patients with CRSwNP seen in the SYNAPSE trial. In addition, the investigators seek to establish the link between viral disease and eosinophilia, based upon a concept of viral interference with immunologic response inspired by findings from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study Design:

In this monocentric prospective cohort study, two seasoned investigators will assess the disease-modifying effects of mepolizumab on CRSwNP. This study aims to identify in a ''real-world'' setting the mechanisms underpinning the prolonged response to mepolizumab and identify biomarkers predictive of prolonged response. Thirty-six patients with CRSwNP unresponsive to medical and surgical treatment will be treated with twelve months of mepolizumab in an unblinded and nonrandomized fashion (open-label).

The response will be assessed with usual clinical parameters, including sino-nasal endoscopy. The mechanism of response will be explored in depth before and 6 months after the beginning of treatment with a multiomic approach. The long-term effect will be assessed by clinical assessment only.

  1. Determine the mechanism of action of mepolizumab in CRSwNP with multiomics. The investigators will explore the critical mechanisms that contribute to transcription patterns in diseased tissue in a cell-type-specific perspective and explore whether viral infection contributes to CRS. Simultaneous profiling of gene expression and open chromatin from the same cell will be used to capture epigenetic modifications in identified cell clusters by RNA-seq combined with an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (Chromium Single-Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene expression, 10X Genomics).
  2. Confirm improved epithelial regeneration and repair following mepolizumab treatment via in vitro functional assessment of epithelial capacity for regeneration.

    Using in vitro wound healing models, the investigators will evaluate the proliferation and cell migration of PEC from patients' nasal polyp biopsy prior to and 6 months after the beginning of treatment. Each time point will be assessed in triplicate on petri (3 wells/ patient) along with cultures on Lab-Tek chamber slides for immunofluorescence assays. Functional assessment of the capacity of tissue repair will be assessed by the speed of repair following standardized injury. Immunofluorescence will assess the markers of the epithelium (tubulin, cadherin, vimentin etc.) and epithelial function (tight junction, zonula occludens, integrins etc.) and by the presence of proliferation markers (Ki-67) at the wound site.

  3. Identify associated epigenetic marks of response which can serve as potential biomarkers of the responder population.

    As described above, epigenetic modulation of the genome will be assessed at the single-cell level in multiomic profiling. In order to restrict epigenetic profiling to epigenetic modifications which may have a use as biomarkers, DNA methylation profiling will be performed by DNA MethylationEPIC Beadchip to identify putative biomarkers of response to treatment and identify methylation-related regulatory mechanisms.

  4. Characterise the impact of mepolizumab on viruses by defining a library of viruses present in CRSwNP and comparing their levels pre- and post-treatment with mepolizumab.

    The investigators will perform sequenced-based profiling using deep sequencing technologies (Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing) to reveal candidate viral pathogens using an existing pre-COVID biobank of CRSwNP tissue in our institution to define the type of viruses present in CRSwNP. Similarly, viruses will be assessed in the population undergoing treatment with mepolizumab to assess whether treatment influences viral burden and specific viruses.

  5. Identify epigenetic marks associated with the presence of different viruses which can serve as markers of prior viral infection.

The investigators will investigate the specific association between viruses and epigenetic marks with the integrative analysis of the resulting data using epigenomics and transcriptomics methods.

There will be a follow-up of patients over 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral NP, as diagnosed by endoscopy or historical CT scan
  • At least one NP surgery* within the last 10 years.
  • Severe NP symptoms consistent with a need for surgery (obstruction VAS symptom score>5, overall, VAS symptom score >7, endoscopic bilateral NP score ≥4 [with a score ≥2 in each nasal cavity]).
  • Ongoing treatment with INCS (via spray or intranasal liquid steroid wash/douching) for ≥4 weeks prior to screening
  • ≥2 of the following CRS symptoms for at least 12 weeks:

    • Nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion
    • Nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip)
    • Facial pain/pressure
    • Reduction or loss of sense of smell

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If as a result of a medical interview, physical examination, or screening investigation the physician responsible considers the participant unfit for the study.
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (also known as Churg Strauss syndrome), Young's, Kartagener's or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
  • Antrochoanal polyps
  • Nasal septal deviation occluding one nostril
  • Acute sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) at screening or 2 weeks prior to screening
  • Ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound or chemical-induced rhinitis)
  • Participants who have undergone any intranasal and/or sinus surgery (for example polypectomy, balloon dilatation or nasal stent insertion) within 6 months prior to V1
  • Participants where NP surgery is contraindicated in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Participants with a known medical history of HIV infection.
  • Participants with a known, pre-existing parasitic infestation within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Participants who are currently receiving or have received within 3 months (or 5 half-lives - whatever is the longest) prior to the screening visit, radiotherapy, or investigational medications/therapies.
  • Participants with a history of sensitivity to any of the study medications, or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GSK Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation. Aspirin-sensitive participants are acceptable.
  • Participants with a history of allergic reaction to anti-IL-5 or other monoclonal antibody therapy.
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids (including oral corticosteroids) within 4 weeks prior to screening or planned use of such medications during the double-blind period
  • Treatments with biological or immunosuppressive treatment (other than Xolair) treatment within 5 terminal phase half-lives of Visit 1
  • Omalizumab (Xolair) treatment in the 130 days prior to Visit 1
  • Commencement or change of dose of allergen immunotherapy within the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study. Contraceptive use will be required with a double barrier method or documented effective surgical sterilization.
  • Immunocompromised subjects from disease or medication, other than oral corticosteroids.
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) will be included with measures to prevent accidental exposure to IMP by using double barrier contraception and pregnancy test prior to injection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mepolizumab 100mg injection
Mepolizumab 100mg SC once every 4 weeks for 48 weeks (twelve injections)
Patients will receive Mepolizumab 100mg SC once every 4 weeks for 48 weeks (twelve injections, no placebo) at the hospital. The IMP will be administered following clinic procedures and blood collection. Patients will be monitored at the study site for at least 30 minutes after injections for signs of hypersensitivity reaction. Subcutaneous injection sites should be alternated among the 4 quadrants of the abdomen (avoiding navel and waist areas) or the upper arms. Background therapy will be assured with mometasone furoate nasal spray (200µg BID) daily throughout the study.
Other Names:
  • Nucala

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Persistent clinical response to mepolizumab after cessation off mepoluzimab treatment
Time Frame: 18 months
Percentage (%) of participants demonstrating persistent clinical response to mepolizumab following cessation of treatment will be defined as persistence of improvement in Nasal Polyp size greater than 1 six months after cessation of a twelve-month treatment course of mepoluzimab.
18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine effect of mepolizumab on trafficking of individual immune and structural cell types present in the epithelium in CRSwNP
Time Frame: 6 months
Single-cell transcriptomic techniques will be used to identify cell types present in CRSwNP biopsy samples. Relative proportion identified cell types will be defined, and compared at pre-treatment and after 6 months of treatment with mepolizumab.
6 months
Effect on epithelial function in vitro
Time Frame: 6 months
In vitro wound repair speed will be measured in primary epithelial cell (PEC) cultures raised from the patients, before and at 6-month time point of mepolizumab treatment.
6 months
Effect on epithelial function in vivo
Time Frame: 6 months
Impact of mepolizumab on In vivo epithelial development and differentiation will be verified by gene expression profiling. Endoscopically-collected epithelial brushings will be collected before and after mepoluzimab treatment. Samples will be processed to undergo expression proofing to assess activity of genes associated with epithelial proliferation and differentiation in Gene Set Ontology (GSEA) Hallmark network.
6 months
Identify viruses associated with CRSwNP.
Time Frame: 6 months
A library of frozen samples biopsies taken from CRSwNP patients undergoing ESS for inflammatory disease will be compared with control subjects undergoing access procedures to the skull base . Viruses will be defined as 'significantly present' if identified in five reads of more of bulk sequencing. Viruses associated with CRSwNP will be defined as those attaining significant levels in tissue (defined as greater than 5 'reads') and not significantly present in healthy tissue.
6 months
Explore the modulation of viruses by biological therapy.
Time Frame: 18 months
Characterize the impact of mepolizumab on viruses by comparing candidate virus levels pre- and post-treatment with mepolizumab.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Yvon Desrosiers, MD, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Clinical Trials on Mepolizumab 100 MG Injection

Subscribe