Intervention Effect of High Definition Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HD-tACS) on Depressive Disorder

January 17, 2026 updated by: WANG KAI, Anhui Medical University
To investigate the intervention effect of high definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) on suicidal ideation in patients with depressive disorder and its underlying neural mechanism by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forty patients with depressive disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 were recruited from the Anhui Mental Health Center and the first affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All participants underwent a structured interview and routine laboratory examination before and after receiving high definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) treatment after meeting the inclusion criteria and obtaining informed consent. Each participant will complete the clinical evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and HD-tACS treatment conducted by trained researchers at the Anhui Mental Health Center. All the participants were randomized (1:1) to receive an "active HD-tACS" or "sham HD-tACS" treatment protocol. tACS: the central electrode was placed over F3 with return electrodes placed at Fp1, Fz, F7 and C3. Fourteen 2-mA sessions (ramp-up and ramp-down periods of 15 and 15 seconds, respectively) were applied for 30 minutes per session, twice daily over 7 consecutive days, and the stimulus frequency was set as individual alpha frequency (IAF). Sham HD-tACS was delivered using the same protocol and current intensity, but the period of active stimulation was only during the ramp-up and ramp-down periods of 15 and 15 seconds.

Before and after the treatments, the patients received a battery measure of neuropsychological tests, resting EEG, and MRI scans in multimodalities. The neuropsychological assessment included HAMD, MADRS, BDI, HAMA, BSS, C-SSRS, PHQ15, RRS, TEPS, PVAQ, MoCA, Stroop Test, VFT, DST, and AVLT. Multimodal MRI includes 3D-T1, rs-fMRI, and DTI. The symptoms of the patients were followed up one and two months after the end of treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230022
        • Yanghua Tian

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the patients were diagnosed by more than 2 psychiatrists and met the diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 for depression, and item 3 of the HAMD≥3.
  • the age ranged from 18 to 65 years old, and the length of education was more than 5 years.
  • the visual acuity or corrected visual acuity is normal, right-handed, can cooperate with the completion of various experimental tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • accompanied by severe somatic diseases, such as severe heart, liver, renal insufficiency and so on.
  • accompanied by other neurological diseases, such as stroke, epilepsy and so on. pregnant and lactating women.
  • accompanied by other mental disorders, such as drug abuse, schizophrenia, schizophrenic affective

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: real stimulation
The central electrode was placed over F3, with return electrodes at Fp1, Fz, F7 and C3. Fourteen 2-mA sessions (ramp-up and ramp-down periods of 15 and 15 seconds, respectively) were applied for 30 minutes per session, twice daily over 7 consecutive days, and the stimulus frequency was set as IAF.
tACS is described as a non-invasive form of brain stimulation that uses a low-intensity, alternating current applied directly to the head through scalp electrodes.
Sham Comparator: sham stimulation
In the sham condition, tACS was delivered only during the ramp-up and ramp-down periods (15 and 15 s); no current was delivered during the 30-minute intervention. Participants will receive sham tACS twice daily for two weeks.
In the sham condition, tACS was delivered only during the ramp-up and ramp-down periods (15s and 15s); no current was delivered during the 30-minute intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The BSS is a 19-item scale to measure the severity of suicidal ideation, where each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 2. The BSS total score ranges from 0 to 38 with lower scores indicating less suicidal ideation.
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) Response Rate (≥50% Improvement From Baseline)
Time Frame: week 1 (end of treatment) and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The BSS is a self-report measure of suicidal ideation severity, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Response was defined a priori as a 50% or greater reduction in BSS total score from baseline. The BSS response rate was calculated as the proportion of participants meeting this criterion at each postbaseline assessment.
week 1 (end of treatment) and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. The suicidal ideation module evaluates (1) ideation severity over the past month (rated 1-5, with 0 indicating no suicidal ideation) and (2) ideation intensity across 5 items (eg, frequency and duration), each rated 0-5, yielding a total intensity score ranging from 0 to 25; higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation. The suicidal behavior module captures the presence and characteristics of suicidal behaviors (eg, number of attempts and lethality).
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The HAMD is a clinician-administered depression assessment and consists of 17 items with a total score range from 0 to 54. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The MADRS is a 10-item scale to measure the severity of depressive episodes, where each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 6. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60, with lower scores indicating less depressive symptoms.
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The BDI is a 13-item scale to measure the severity of depressive episodes, where each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 3. The BDI total score ranges from 0 to 39, with lower scores indicating less depressive symptoms.
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
The HAMA is a 14-item scale to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms, where each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 4. The HAMA total score ranges from 0 to 56, with lower scores indicating less anxiety symptoms.
baseline, week 1 (end of treatment), and week 5 (end of follow-up)
Change in Game of Dice Task (GDT) Score
Time Frame: baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)
The GDT is a computerized task assessing risk decision-making under explicit probabilities. Participants choose between higher-risk options with lower winning probabilities (<50%) and higher safe options with winning probabilities (≥50%) across 18 trials; outcomes (gains/losses) are presented after each trial. Prespecified outcomes included the number of risky choices, number of safe choices, and a net score (safe choices minus risky choices), with higher net scores indicating safer decision-making.
baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)
EEG Measure of Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FFA) Oscillations
Time Frame: baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)
EEG recordings were obtained from each subject based on 64 electrode locations of the International 10-20 system (sampling frequency 1000Hz). The change in FFA (8-13 Hz electrical activity) over time was measured.
baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)
MRI measures of functional connectivity (FC)
Time Frame: baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)
the functional connectivity between stimulated target and the whole brain areas; the global and regional activity measures.
baseline and week 1 (end of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yanghua Tian, PhD, Anhui Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AHMU-tACS-MDD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on High definition transcranial alternating current stimulation

Subscribe