Effects of Local Vibrations Program of Dorsiflexor Muscles on Neuromotor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients. (NEUROVIB-AVC)

Effects of Local Vibrations Program of Dorsiflexor Muscles on Neuromotor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients - a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of the vibration intervention proposed in the current study is to allow a better neuromotor recovery in subacute stroke patients when compared with standard rehabilitation alone. These last years, it has been proven that the solicitation of a muscle using vibrations may lead to positive effects on the neuromuscular function. Thus, the aim of the current study is to assess if the addition to a standard rehabilitation program of local vibrations sessions of the dorsiflexor muscles of the paretic limb of stroke patients may allow a better recovery of walking speed (primary outcome). One group using vibrations (i.e. experimental group) and one group with sham vibration (i.e. control group) will take part to this study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Le Chambon-Feugerolles, France, 42500
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Georges Claudinon
        • Contact:
          • Thibault TRAMOY, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thibault TRAMOY, MD
      • Rive-de-Gier, France, 42800
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Marrel
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bachir SAHI, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kevin STAMPONE, MD
        • Contact:
          • Bachir SAHI, MD
      • Roanne, France, 42300
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier de Roanne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Annelise MOULINET, MD
      • Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or, France, 69370
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de SSR Val-Rosay
        • Contact:
          • Julie DI MARCO, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Julie DI MARCO, MD
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42100
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Bellevue, CHU de Saint-etienne
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hugo BESSAGUET, MD
        • Contact:
          • Bruno FERNANDEZ, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruno FERNANDEZ, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pascal GIRAUX, MD PhP
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julia TOULY, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Etienne OJARDIAS, MD
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42270
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service de SSR du Centre Le Clos Champirol
        • Contact:
          • Alexandre BERTHOLON, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre BERTHOLON, MD
      • Saint-Genis-Laval, France, 69230
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon, site Henry Gabrielle
        • Contact:
          • Sophie JACQUIN COURTOIS, MD PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie JACQUIN COURTOIS, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laure HUCHON, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke patients in subacute rehabilitation phase (between 14 days and 3 months post-stroke)
  • Presenting with a stroke, ischemic or hemorrhagic
  • Lower-limb deficiency with an initial motor testing < 4 according to the MRC scale
  • No neurological history with functional impact other than stroke
  • Having received informed information about the study and having signed the written consent
  • Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme.
  • Patients under guardianship may be included; they may give their consent with the assistance of their guardian.

If the participant is unable to write, their consent may be given and documented by other appropriate means in the presence of at least one impartial witness. In this case, the witness will sign and date the informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple stroke
  • Other neurological, cognitive or psychiatric conditions
  • Orthopedic ankle history compromising measurements
  • Botulinum toxin injected in the lower limb prior the study protocol
  • Patient with phlebitis or risk of thrombosis in the lower limb
  • Patient under tutorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vibration
Stroke patients in subacute rehabilitation phase will be included. In addition of a subacute post-stroke standard rehabilitation program, they will have a vibration program.
The program will take place over 40 sessions : 5 sessions per week, for 2 months (40 sessions in total over 8 weeks during the hospitalization in the department); this group will benefit from an effective vibration of a frequency of 100Hz
Other Names:
  • VIBRAMOOV PHYSIO
Short-distance ambulation speed is measurement between 2 markers on the ground 10 meters apart in a corridor with flat ground, the patient starting his walk 3 meters before to have a launched march disregarding markers, and ends 3 meters After. The stopwatch is started when the markers are crossed.
Long-distance ambulation speed is measured from a standing start and the test involves asking the patient to walk as far as possible in 2 minutes.
The Fugl-Meyer (FMA-LE) assessment of motor skills : measurement of the intensity of reflexes, as well as an assessment of voluntary movements and motor coordination. Score from 0 to 34
The modified Ashworth scale allows the measurement of spasticity, that is to say the measurement of muscle tone by mobilizing the segment of the lower limb and by evaluating the resistance to stretching of the muscles. Score from 0 to 4
The ABILOCO questionnaire evaluate the autonomy in the walking capacities of the patients (13-items)
The Barthel index measure autonomy in daily life.
Evaluate voluntary maximum force in isometric ankle dorsiflexion by Cybex isometric ergometer results.
Other Names:
  • Cybex isometric ergometer (Henley Healthcare, Sugarland, TX, USA)
Assessment of neuromuscular fatigue by electromyograms (EMG). Surface electrodes is place on the tibial muscle anterior to non-invasively collect electromyograms (EMG). The intensity of stimulation will be gradually increased until a plateau in mechanical (strength) and electromyograms (EMG) responses is obtained.
Other Names:
  • Electrodes Meditrace 100, Covidien, Mansfield, MA
Gait kinematics will be recorded on a force platform (90 x 90 cm, Model 9287C, Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) to determine: joint angles, net joint moments and powers at the ankle, knee and hip.
Other Names:
  • 0D
Addition of a temporal component to the traditional quantified gait analysis, allowing the focus to be on time series parameters.
Other Names:
  • 1D
A short questionnaire consisting of 13 questions to which the patient answers on a scale from 0 to 4. The scores are simply added up, inverting the scale for negative sentences, to give a result out of 52 points. The lower the score, the greater the fatigue.
Sham Comparator: no vibration
In addition of a subacute post-stroke standard rehabilitation program, they will have a sham vibration program.
Short-distance ambulation speed is measurement between 2 markers on the ground 10 meters apart in a corridor with flat ground, the patient starting his walk 3 meters before to have a launched march disregarding markers, and ends 3 meters After. The stopwatch is started when the markers are crossed.
Long-distance ambulation speed is measured from a standing start and the test involves asking the patient to walk as far as possible in 2 minutes.
The Fugl-Meyer (FMA-LE) assessment of motor skills : measurement of the intensity of reflexes, as well as an assessment of voluntary movements and motor coordination. Score from 0 to 34
The modified Ashworth scale allows the measurement of spasticity, that is to say the measurement of muscle tone by mobilizing the segment of the lower limb and by evaluating the resistance to stretching of the muscles. Score from 0 to 4
The ABILOCO questionnaire evaluate the autonomy in the walking capacities of the patients (13-items)
The Barthel index measure autonomy in daily life.
Evaluate voluntary maximum force in isometric ankle dorsiflexion by Cybex isometric ergometer results.
Other Names:
  • Cybex isometric ergometer (Henley Healthcare, Sugarland, TX, USA)
Assessment of neuromuscular fatigue by electromyograms (EMG). Surface electrodes is place on the tibial muscle anterior to non-invasively collect electromyograms (EMG). The intensity of stimulation will be gradually increased until a plateau in mechanical (strength) and electromyograms (EMG) responses is obtained.
Other Names:
  • Electrodes Meditrace 100, Covidien, Mansfield, MA
Gait kinematics will be recorded on a force platform (90 x 90 cm, Model 9287C, Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) to determine: joint angles, net joint moments and powers at the ankle, knee and hip.
Other Names:
  • 0D
Addition of a temporal component to the traditional quantified gait analysis, allowing the focus to be on time series parameters.
Other Names:
  • 1D
A short questionnaire consisting of 13 questions to which the patient answers on a scale from 0 to 4. The scores are simply added up, inverting the scale for negative sentences, to give a result out of 52 points. The lower the score, the greater the fatigue.
The program will take place over 40 sessions: 5 sessions per week, for 2 months (40 sessions in total over 8 weeks during hospitalization in the department); this group will not benefit from effective vibration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed by 10 meters Walk Test (in meter /second) results
Time Frame: Month 2
Analysis Gait speed by 10 meters Walk Test (in meter /second) results
Month 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking performance by 10 meters Walk Test (in meter /second) results
Time Frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis Walking performance (comfort speed) by 10 meters Walk Test (in meter /second) results
Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Walking performance by 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT) (in meter) results
Time Frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis Walking performance (distance) by 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT) (in meter) results
Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Walking performance by Quantified Gait Analysis results
Time Frame: Month 2, 4
Walking performance will be assessed using: (in m/s) in the 10-meter test (short distance), distance (in m) covered in a 2-minute walk test (long distance) , and qualitatively by a Quantified Gait Analysis (performed only in M2 and M4).
Month 2, 4
Autonomy in walking activities
Time Frame: Month 4
The patient's autonomy in walking activities will be measured by the ABILOCO questionnaire and in daily living activities by the Barthel index.
Month 4
Lower limb strength
Time Frame: Month 4
Lower extremity strength will be measured as maximal voluntary strength in isometric ankle dorsiflexion.
Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue (1)
Time Frame: Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue will be assessed by the level of voluntary activation (in %).
Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue (2)
Time Frame: Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue will be assessed by corticospinal and intracortical excitability thanks to electromyographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue (3)
Time Frame: Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue will be assessed by spinal excitability thanks to electromyographic responses evoked by electrical nerve stimulation.
Month 4
Motor function of the paretic lower limb
Time Frame: Month 4
The motor function of the paretic lower limb will be measured by the Fugl Meyer Assessment scale for lower limbs (FMA-LE) which includes five domains: Motor skills; Balance skills; Sensitivity; Range of motion; Joint pain. A three-point ordinal scale (0: cannot perform; 1: partially performed; 2: fully performed) is applied to each item. The maximum score is 226.
Month 4
Lower limb spasticity level
Time Frame: Month 4
The level of spasticity of the lower limb will be measured by the modified Ashworth scale : a 6-point scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where the lowest scores represent normal muscle tone and the highest scores represent spasticity or increased resistance to passive movement.
Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue (4)
Time Frame: Month 4
Neuromuscular fatigue will be assessed by perceived subjective fatigue measured by the FACIT questionnaire : the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System is a collection of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires targeted to the management of chronic illness, including over 400 questions. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better quality of life.
Month 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruno FERNANDEZ, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 7, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data shared: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal To achieve aims in the approved proposal Proposals should be directed to corresponding author. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on Vibration

Subscribe