Correlation Between Internal Jugular Vein Ultrasound and Electrical Cardiometry

October 14, 2023 updated by: Egymedicalpedia

Correlation Between Internal Jugular Vein Ultrasound and Electrical Cardiometry in Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is one of the most frequently performed cardiac surgery procedures worldwide. CABG has been used for more than 40 years to relieve symptoms and to reduce the risk of death in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiopulmonary bypass can produce changes in fluid physiology and fluid responsiveness in patients characterized by increased interstitial fluid as a consequence of decreased cardiac output and inflammatory changes. This shift of fluid from intravascular space to the intrtstitial space, in addition to blood and fluid losses during the surgical procedure can result in an intravascular hypovolemia that requires fluid resuscitation.

Fluid management is one of the most important treatments for stabilizing hemodynamics in patients during and after cardiac surgery. Hypovolemia may leads to inadequate organ perfusion, whereas fluid overload may lead to postoperative complications such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary edema, In addition to patients who underwent cardiac surgery have a certain degree of myocardial stunning and hence cautions should be taken regarding fluid management in patients with limited cardiac reserve.

Fluid responsiveness (FR) is generally defined as an increase of 10-15% in stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), or cardiac index (CI) in response to volume expansion and indicates unmasked hypovolemia or preload dependacy.

The methods for assessing fluid responsiveness have been evolved from static and volume parameters such as central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava (SVC) diameters, right ventricular end-diastolic volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume, which are unable to predict fluid responsiveness to dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV),stroke volume variation (SVV), Pleth variability index (PVI) and aortic blood flow which is based on heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation, which have amodest degree of accuracy.

Techniques based on either a virtual or real fluid challenge such as passive led raising (PLR) and rapid fluid challenge (100-250cc) have a high degree of accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness.

Over the last decade, a number of studies have used heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation to assess fluid responsiveness; specifically pulse pressuer variation (PPV) derived from analysis of the arterial blood pressure wave form, stroke volume variation (SVV) derived from pulse-contour analysis (measured by lithium dilution cardiac output monitoring system (LiDDCO) or pulse index continuous cardiac output monitoring system (PiCCO), and the variation of the amplitude of the pulse oximter plethysmographic waveform have been shown to be highly predictive of fluid responsiveness.

However, dynamic parameters are unreliable during spontaneous breathing activity. To overcome the limited accuracy of these hemodynamic parameters in this specific clinical scenario, a passive leg raising (PLR) manoeuver has been suggested to be reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing.

SVV can be monitored with the PiCCO system requiring transpulmonary thermodilution,It is an invasive procedure requires the venous access and balloon flotation of the catheter through the right side.

Accordingly, there are complications associated with detection with this system, and some are even fatal. Furthermore, this system requires an elaborate protocol for intermittent injections into pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Al-Azhar University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (above 18 years old to be able to provide advanced informed consent Planned for elective CABG surgery) both male and female will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severely reduced preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (< 40 %).
  • Patients who will develop any complication after fluid infusion as pulmonary edema and heart failure will be excluded from the study.
  • Significant cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Significant valvular heart disease.
  • Clinically evident pulmonary disease.
  • Bilaterally inserted venous catheters (jugular or subclavian vein).
  • History of radiotherapy or surgery of the neck region.
  • Inability to obtain interpretable ultrasound images due to a difficult acoustic window.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Responder group
About 20 Adult patients Planned for elective CABG surgery
Assessing the reliability of predicting fluid responsiveness in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using ultrasonography of the internal jugular vein for assessment of vessel distensibilty in relation to stroke volume variation (SVV) measured by electrical cardiometry.
Experimental: Not Responder group
About 20 Adult patients Planned for elective CABG surgery
Assessing the reliability of predicting fluid responsiveness in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using ultrasonography of the internal jugular vein for assessment of vessel distensibilty in relation to stroke volume variation (SVV) measured by electrical cardiometry.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability of predicting fluid responsiveness
Time Frame: 2 hours after the coronary artery bypass graft surgery
to assess the reliability of predicting fluid responsiveness in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using ultrasonography of the internal jugular vein for assessment of vessel distensibilty in relation to stroke volume variation (SVV) measured by electrical cardiometry.
2 hours after the coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thoracic fluid content
Time Frame: 2 hours after the coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Evaluate the ability of thoracic fluid content (TFC) measured by electrical cardiometry to be an additive for the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
2 hours after the coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mofeed Abdallah, Professor, Al-Azhar University, Faculty of medicine for boys
  • Study Director: Mohamed Abdelgawad, Assist.Professor, Department of Anesthesia,Faculty of Medicine,Al-Azhar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Anas Ezzat Fathy

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting surgery

Subscribe