Inter-observer Variability in the Segmentation of Prostate Tumour Lesions Using Multiparametric MRI (VARIOP) (VARIOP)

August 16, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Inter-observer Variability in the Segmentation of Prostate Tumour Lesions Using Multiparametric MRI

Following the major technological and scientific advances in external radiotherapy in recent decades, thanks to the use of three-dimensional conformal techniques combined with intensity modulation, image-guided radiotherapy has enabled radiotherapists to increase doses without increasing sequelae and complications, giving rise to the term "dose escalation".

Following multiple dose-escalation clinical trials showing better biological control of PSA, the results of the latest phase 3 FLAME trial incorporated the notion of intraprostatic boost in relation to the primary prostate lesion, considered to be the preferred site of neoplastic recurrence in prostate cancer.

This leads to the first question, which concerns the identification of the dominant lesion and its precise delimitation. This last point is subject to variation between operators. A retrospective cohort from the Finistère region will therefore be used to develop a number of study points relating to :

inter-operator contour variability

  • Factors influencing contour
  • Impact of contour variability on dosimetry
  • Automatic segmentation

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Following the major technological and scientific advances in external radiotherapy in recent decades, thanks to the use of three-dimensional conformal techniques combined with intensity modulation, image-guided radiotherapy has enabled radiotherapists to increase doses without increasing sequelae and complications, giving rise to the term "dose escalation".

Following multiple dose-escalation clinical trials showing better biological control of PSA, the results of the latest phase 3 FLAME trial incorporated the notion of intraprostatic boost in relation to the primary prostate lesion, considered to be the preferred site of neoplastic recurrence in prostate cancer.

One of the issues raised by such a study is the methodology used to contour the tumour lesion, an issue which concerns the whole field of radiotherapy. The reference imaging technique for diagnosing prostate cancer, and more specifically the dominant tumour lesion, is multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. This leads to the first question, which concerns the identification of the dominant lesion and its precise delimitation. This last point is subject to variation between operators. A retrospective cohort from the Finistère region will therefore be used to develop a number of study points relating to :

inter-operator contour variability

  • Factors influencing contour
  • Impact of contour variability on dosimetry
  • Automatic segmentation

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient treated or being treated for prostatic adenocarcinoma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Histologically proven localized prostatic neoplasia on trans-rectal biopsies.
  • Multiparametric prostate MRI performed prior to prostate biopsies.
  • No opposition expressed
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery, prostatic irradiation or hormonal treatment prior to diagnosis.
  • History of prostate cancer
  • No identifiable target lesion on mpMRI (<PIRADS 3)
  • Opposition formulated
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-observer variability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The main criterion for judging inter-observer variability is the spatial overlap of contours on mpMRI, represented by the DICE similarity coefficient, which ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 represents zero variability between contours of the same lesion.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical factors influencing inter-observer variability.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Subgroup analysis of radio-clinical-histological factors likely to influence inter-observer variability.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Assessing inter-sequence reproducibility
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Assessing inter-sequence reproducibility
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Dosimetric impact of Inter-observer variability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The influence of variability on dosimetry in IMRT/VMAT conformal radiotherapy.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Automatic segmentation of prostatic tumors
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Contour variability using a deep-learning automated segmentation technique, with and without implementation of factors identified as impacting contour in manual technique.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent BOURBONNE, MD, PhD, Radiation Oncology Department, Brest University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning three years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe