CsA+ATG+AVA vs. CsA+AVA for the Treatment of Newly-diagnosed SAA in the Elderly

August 16, 2023 updated by: Bing Han, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Ciclosporin + Antithymocyte Immunoglobulin + Avatrombpag Versus Ciclosporin + Avatrombpag for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia in the Elderly

This is a multicenter, prospective, randonmized study. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. We wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly. Meanwhile, to explore the predictive factors of efficacy, to find out a safe and effective treatment strategy for the Elderly.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aplastic anemia (AA) can be divided into severe AA (SAA) and non-severe AA (NSAA), according to the severity of the disease. For SAA patients with o condition of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, guideline recommended ciclosporin A (CsA) + anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) + thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) as the first-line therapy. Our previous retrospective study showed that for SAA patients who were intolerant to ATG, CsA+ eltrombopag (EPAG) had similar efficacy to CsA+ATG+EPAG. However, the adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity and gasrointestinal disorder limit its application in elderly SAA.Compared with EPAG, AVA has no hepatotoxicity and less other adverse effects, but there was few studies for AA. Our previous study demonstrated that AVA was effective in 55% of refractory AA. Since the action mechanism of AVA and EPAG is not exactly the same, and the metabolic level of the elderly is not the same as that of younger patients, it is unknown whether there are predictive factors of efficacy in the treatment of AVA. Thus, we wondered whether CsA+AVA could achieve an efficacy similar to CsA+ATG+AVA in the Elderly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia, aged greater than 60 years.
  2. Patients met the diagnostic criteria of severe aplastic anemia (SAA).
  3. Complete all screening assessments as outlined in the test protocol.
  4. Without or with no more than 1 month treatment of ciclosporine, tacrolimus, glucocortocoid, or TPO-RAs.
  5. Agree to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known diagnosis of congenital hematopoietic failure disorders (e.g. Fanconi anemia) and other causes of cytopenia.
  2. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding and/or infection despite standard treatment.
  3. Patients with previous history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
  4. Patients with previous history of thrombosis in 1 year.
  5. Patients with concurrent malignancy.
  6. Those who are considered unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.
  7. Abnormal renal function: creatinine > 1.2 normal upper limit, albumin < 0.9 normal lower limit, or CLcr < 30 ml/min.
  8. Abnormal liver function: transaminase > 2.5 normal upper limit, or tota bilirubin > 2.5 normal upper limit.
  9. Patients with severe heart, liver or renal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CsA+ATG+AVA
Ciclosporine: 3-5 mg/kg/d orally, with ciclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 100-200 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered; Anti-human thymocyte: rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (r-ATG 3mg/kg/d) was administered intravenously for 5 days; Avatrombopag:60 mg/d orally, for a total of 24 weeks. Adjust the dose according to the platelet counts of patients.
3-5 mg/kg/d orally, trough concentrations: 100-200 ng/ml
60 mg/d orally, 24 weeks
rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (r-ATG 3mg/kg/d), intravenously, 5 days;
Experimental: CsA+AVA
Ciclosporine: 3-5 mg/kg/d orally, with ciclosporine trough concentrations maintained at 100-200 ng/ml for 3 months to achieve maximum efficacy and then tapered; Avatrombopag:60 mg/d orally, for a total of 24 weeks. Adjust the dose according to the platelet counts of patients.
3-5 mg/kg/d orally, trough concentrations: 100-200 ng/ml
60 mg/d orally, 24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall response rate
Time Frame: 6 month
Proportion of patient who achieved partial response or complete response
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete response rate
Time Frame: 6 month
Proportion of patient who achieved complete response (HGB>100g/L, PLT>100×109/L, ANC>1.0×109/L)
6 month
Relapse rate
Time Frame: 12 month
Proportion of patient who relapse
12 month
Adverse event rate
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 month
Proportion of patient who adverse events
3, 6, 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aplastic Anemia

Clinical Trials on Ciclosporin

3
Subscribe