Enhancing Medical Researchers' Self-learning With an Intelligent Language Model

A Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Novel Intelligent Language Model on the Self-learning Ability of Medical Researchers

Solving medical scientific problems is a crucial driving force behind the advancement of medical disciplines. As the complexity of scientific questions increases, an increasing number of problems require interdisciplinary collaboration to be resolved. However, most medical researchers lack interdisciplinary background knowledge and require substantial time to systematically learn relevant knowledge and skills. Furthermore, the continuous emergence of new knowledge and skills emphasizes the importance of researchers' ability for autonomous learning in the medical field. Therefore, to promote the development of medical disciplines, there is an urgent need for an effective method to enhance researchers' self-directed learning abilities for conducting interdisciplinary research.

The next-generation artificial intelligence language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, hold great potential in assisting researchers to access knowledge and information from various domains. Whether researchers can leverage such AI tools to enhance their self-directed learning abilities for conducting interdisciplinary research remains to be further explored. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the potential degradation of cognitive abilities through their use, although valid evidence is currently lacking.

To investigate whether AI tools, represented by ChatGPT, can effectively assist medical researchers in conducting interdisciplinary research and whether their usage may negatively impact researchers' cognitive abilities, a randomized controlled trial is warranted. This trial aims to ascertain the potential benefits and risks associated with utilizing AI tools in the medical research domain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Junior ophthalmologist with 1-3 years of clinical experience
  • 20-28 years old, regardless of gender
  • No prior experience in interdisciplinary research involving digital medicine
  • Self-reported a minimum of 20 hours of participation in this study during the trial period
  • Agree to participate in this study and sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with reading difficulties or reading disabilities
  • Reluctance to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intelligent Language Model Group
Subjects must use the intelligent language model to complete the retrieval and protocol design execution of an interdisciplinary task, in addition to Google search, literature search and book query.
Subjects must use the intelligent language model to complete the retrieval and protocol design execution of an interdisciplinary task, in addition to Google search, literature search and book query.
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Subjects can only use Google search, literature retrieval and book query, and cannot use any AI-driven conversational natural language processing tools to complete the retrieval and protocol design execution of an interdisciplinary task.
Subjects can only use Google search, literature retrieval and book query, and cannot use any AI-driven conversational natural language processing tools to complete the retrieval and protocol design execution of an interdisciplinary task.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
completion rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
The number of people who completed the task within the given time / the total number of people in the group
through study completion, an average of 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the research program
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
The feasibility of the scheme is scored by a scoring group composed of experts. The feasibility is divided into 1-5 points according to the correctness and integrity of the key steps and details of the test. The higher the score, the higher the feasibility. The 1 point represents more than half of the key steps are missing or wrong, and the 5 point represents all the key steps and the details are appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Artificial Intelligence

Clinical Trials on Intelligent Language Model

Subscribe