Clinical Efficacy and Health Economic Evaluation of an Intelligent Diagnostic and Treatment Model

July 8, 2026 updated by: Zan Wang

Clinical Efficacy and Health Economic Evaluation of an Intelligent Diagnostic and Treatment Model Based on Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Disorder

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an intelligent therapy based on digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia disorders

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Insomnia is a highly prevalent and distressing disorder, yet access to its first-line treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) remains highly limited. Therefore, providing accessible and personalized CBT-I is pivotal in its application. With the widespread development of the internet and mobile application devices, digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (dCBT-I) has opened new avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia disorder. Studies have explored internet-based, self-administered CBT-I treatment models, which have increased access to effective psychological therapy for patients with insomnia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

404

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130021
        • Recruiting
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Clinical diagnosis of insomnia disorder; (2) Cooperate to complete the questionnaire surveys.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Current use of central nervous system stimulants; (2) Use of analgesics, theophylline preparations, steroid medications; (3) Alcohol abuse or regular alcohol intake; (4) Diagnosis of other sleep disorders (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, restless legs syndrome) ; (5) Sleep disorders secondary to organic diseases (e.g., epilepsy, diabetes, renal failure).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Traditional treatment group
sleep drug treatment
Active Comparator: Intelligent diagnosis and treatment group
Intelligent CBTI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the score of Insomnia Severity Index scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The total score ranges from 0 to 28, and a higher score indicates higher levels of insomnia severity. A score of 8 or greater is the cut point for clinically possible insomnia
6 weeks and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the score of 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The total score ranges from 0 to 21, and a higher score indicates higher levels of anxiety symptoms. A score of 10 or greater is the cut point for clinically possible anxiety
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The total score ranges from 0 to 27, and a higher score indicates higher levels of depression symptoms. A score of 10 or greater is the cut point for clinically possible depression symptom
6 weeks and 3 months
the value of European Quality of Life Five Dimension
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The European Quality of Life Five Dimension is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
6 weeks and 3 months
the value of Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH) questionnaire assesses the impact of health problems on work productivity and daily activities over the past seven days, including absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores are expressed as percentages, with higher scores indicating greater impairment
6 weeks and 3 months
the value of direct medical costs
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
Direct medical costs refer to healthcare expenditures incurred by patients during visits to medical institutions, including consultation fees, diagnostic and examination costs, medication expenses, and hospitalization costs
6 weeks and 3 months
the value of indirect costs
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
Indirect costs refer to productivity losses associated with insomnia disorder and treatment-seeking, including work absence, reduced productivity while working, overall work productivity loss, activity impairment, and productivity loss among family caregivers or accompanying persons. Costs will be estimated in Chinese yuan using the human capital approach.
6 weeks and 3 months
Change in total sleep time (TST) measured by sleep diary
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
6 weeks and 3 months
Change in sleep onset latency (SOL) measured by sleep diary
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
6 weeks and 3 months
Change in wake after sleep onset (WASO) measured by sleep diary
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
6 weeks and 3 months
Change in sleep efficiency (SE) measured by sleep diary
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The total score ranges from 0 to 21, and a higher score indicates poorer sleep quality. A score greater than 5 is commonly used as the cut point for poor sleep quality.
6 weeks and 3 months
20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory is used to assess multidimensional fatigue. It consists of 20 items rated from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 20 to 100, and a higher score indicates a higher level of fatigue.
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The total score ranges from 0 to 24, and a higher score indicates a higher level of daytime sleepiness. A score of 11 or greater is commonly used as the cut point for excessive daytime sleepiness.
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of Hyperarousal Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The Hyperarousal Scale is used to assess cognitive, emotional, and behavioral hyperarousal. It consists of 26 items rated on a 4-point scale from 0 = not at all to 3 = extremely. The total score ranges from 0 to 78, and a higher score indicates a higher level of hyperarousal.
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale-30
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale-30 is used to assess maladaptive beliefs and attitudes related to sleep. It consists of 30 items, with each item rated from 0 to 100. The mean score ranges from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates stronger dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep.
6 weeks and 3 months
the score of 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey is used to assess health-related quality of life. Domain scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
6 weeks and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insomnia

Clinical Trials on Traditional treatment

3
Subscribe