Muscle Energy Technique and Foam Roller Self Myofascial Release in Two-wheeler Riders With Chronic Low Back Pain

August 31, 2023 updated by: AMIR IQBAL, King Saud University

A Comparative Study of Muscle Energy Technique and Foam Roller Self-myofascial Release for Chronic Low Back Pain in Two-wheeler Riders

Pain in the lower back is a major concern in today's era due to prolonged sitting in two-wheeler riders, mainly due to hamstring tightness. It also creates physical disability and impairment in activities of daily living. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique (MET) and self-myofascial release (SMFR) using the foam roller on hamstring flexibility, dynamic balance, and physical disability amongst two-wheeler riders with chronic low back pain. Participants were randomized into two intervention groups, MET and SMFR, using the envelope method, with each group having 20 participants. Hamstring flexibility and range of motion for knee extension and the lower back were assessed using the active knee extension test and sit and reach test, the dynamic balance was assessed by the star excursion balance test (SEBT) and physical disability by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, (RMDQ). Measurements were taken at baseline and after 4-week of intervention. The level of significance value was set at 95% (p <0.05).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study proved that both SMFR using the foam roller and MET are effective in improving hamstring muscle flexibility, dynamic balance, and physical disability in two-wheeler riders with chronic low back pain. Thus, either of the two techniques can be used for treating bikers with tight hamstrings causing chronic low back pain. Compared to MET, SMFR using foam rollers was found to be more effective in enhancing hamstring flexibility, improving balance, and decreasing disability levels on the RMDQ after 4 weeks. This study will be aware of the necessity of hamstring stretching and balance training among two-wheeler riders for a prolonged duration on a daily basis and take the initiative to improve their hamstring flexibility and balance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11433
        • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of applied Medical Science, King Saud University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Two-wheeler riders of either gender between the ages of 20 and 40 years,
  • Who had ridden at least two hours per day for the previous two years,
  • Had musculoskeletal pain in the back for the previous three months, and
  • Had a 15-20-degree loss of knee extension when hips were held in 90-degree flexion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women,
  • Those with a recent spine or lower limb fracture, recent surgery,
  • A previous hamstring injury,
  • Lumbar and lower limb neurological deficits, or limb length disparity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MET Group
Received a muscle energy technique
Participants were required to adopt a supine position. MET's post-isometric relaxation method was chosen. The therapist gently flexed the patient's hip until the limitation bar-rier was detected. At this stage, isometric contractions against resistance were applied. After that, the patients were told to resist the movement with only 25% of their strength. Before the leg was released, the contraction was maintained for 7-10 seconds. On exhale, the knee joint was straightened (extended) towards its new barrier, and a stretch was applied and maintained through that barrier for 30 seconds. This procedure was carried out six times.
Active Comparator: SMFR Group
Received a self-myofascial release technique using a foam roller
A foam roller was rolled from the ischial tuberosity to the back of the knee on the side being tested while the participant remained seated in a long sitting position. Individuals were instructed to keep all of their body weight on the leg being evaluated. They spent 30-40 seconds rolling one hamstring at a time in each set (10 times back and forth).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamstring flexibility
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Hamstring flexibility was assessed using an active knee extension test (AKET) at baseline and four weeks post-intervention.
4 weeks
Active range of motion
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Active range of motion was assessed using a sit and reach test (SRT) at baseline and four weeks post-intervention.
4 weeks
Dynamic balance
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Dynamic balance was assessed using a star excursion balance test (SEBT) at baseline and four weeks post-intervention.
4 weeks
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used assessing the physical disability at baseline and four weeks post-intervention. The RMQ is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure that inquires about pain-related disability resulting from LBP. Items are scored 0 if left blank or 1 if endorsed, for a total RMQ score ranging from 0 to 24; higher scores represent higher levels of pain-related disability.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: AMIR IQBAL, MPT, King Saud University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on Muscle energy technique

Subscribe