Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Different Surgery

October 1, 2024 updated by: Xiaoming Huang, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Comparison of Quality of Life Between Patients with Early Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study

The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased rapidly in recent years, especially in women. Early differentiated thyroid cancer has a good prognosis, and surgery is the main treatment. Traditional open surgery would leave a scar on the neck. However, emerging minimally invasive procedures can avoid the scar on the neck, resulting in better aesthetic effect, which would have an impact on the quality of life of patients to a certain degree.

This study intend to follow up patients regularly with early differentiated thyroid cancer undergoing different surgery. The quality of life, voice, scar would be assessed by authoritative questionaires or scales. We hope to demonstrate that minimally invasive surgery is better than traditional open surgery in order to provide reliable evidence for clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased rapidly in recent years, especially in women. Differentiated thyroid cancer takes the largest proportion in thyroid cancer, but it has a good prognosis. For early differentiated thyroid cancer, surgery is the main treatment. Traditional open surgery would leave a scar on the neck, which is especially troublesome for female patients. However, emerging minimally invasive procedures, such as endoscopy-assisted subclavian approach, robot-assisted transaxillary or transoral approach, etc., can avoid the scar on the neck, resulting in better aesthetic effect, which would have an impact on the quality of life of patients to a certain degree.

This study intend to follow up patients regularly with early differentiated thyroid cancer undergoing surgery according to a prospective cohort design. The evaluation questionnaires including quality of life, voice and scar would be completed to demonstrate that minimally invasive surgery is better than traditional open surgery not only in the way of effectiveness, but also in the quality of life. We hope to provide reliable evidence for clinical practice by this study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510289

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years and < 70 years;
  • Biopsy or surgical pathology indicated differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary thyroid carcinoma, follicular carcinoma);
  • stage T1~T3a, N0~N1a, M0;
  • Ability to read and write Chinese;
  • Willingness to follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old or ≥70 years old;
  • Biopsy or surgical pathology indicated medullary carcinoma or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma;
  • Aggressive histology: tall cell, columnar cell, hobnail variant, etc.
  • Mixed with medullary carcinoma or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma;
  • High risk of recurrence (according to ATA guideline);
  • Lateral cervical lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis;
  • Suffer from other malignant tumors;
  • History of thyroid surgery or cervical lymph node dissection;
  • Cognition or behavior impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
minimally invasive surgery
undergoing thyroidectomy with endoscopy-assisted subclavian approach, robot-assisted transaxillary approach, robot-assisted transoral approach, robot-assisted retroauricular approach, etc.
different minimally invasive approach to complete thyroidectomy, including endoscopy-assisted subclavian approach, robot-assisted transaxillary or transoral approach (not leaving scar on the neck)
traditional open surgery
undergoing thyroidectomy with tradition open surgery
Conventional Open Surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: baseline, 1month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
change of the scores of the SF-36(36-item Short-Form)questionaire
baseline, 1month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
change of quality of life (Thyca-Qol)
Time Frame: baseline, 1month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
change of the scores of the Thyca-Qol(Thyroid Cancer-specific Quality of Life) questionaire
baseline, 1month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
voice handicap index
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
assessment of quality of voice
baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
scores of the surgical scar
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
scores of the questionaires (POSAS) about scar
1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
level of thyroglobulin
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
an indicator to monitor tumor residual or recurrence
baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
level of calcium
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
to indicate whether the patient have hypocalcemia
baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
operation duration
Time Frame: Intraoperative
time for operation
Intraoperative
blood loss
Time Frame: up to 1 week after surgery
blood loss during operation
up to 1 week after surgery
postoperative drainage
Time Frame: up to 1 week after surgery
drainage volume after surgery
up to 1 week after surgery
complications
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
complication events after surgery, e.g. hoarseness, hypocalcemia, hemorrhage, seroma
baseline, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
satisfaction of the surgery
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery
Visual Analog Score for satisfaction
1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Xiaoming Huang, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Cancer

Clinical Trials on minimally invasive procedure

Subscribe