Three-dimensional Changes in Free Gingival Grafts Around Dental Implants

November 25, 2024 updated by: Ayse Ege SELMAN, Biruni University

Evaluation of the Three-dimensional Changes in Free Gingival Grafts Around Dental Implants

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the stability of the free gingival graft dimensions around dental implants and to compare three-dimensional changes according to smoking status. Its primary goal is to provide an answer to:

Is this grafting procedure stable around dental implants? Are there any differences in tissue stability between smoker and non-smoker patients?

Our study consists of 2 groups:

The first group includes smoker patients who need free gingival grafts around their dental implants (n=16).

The second group includes non-smoker patients who need free gingival grafts around their dental implants (n=16).

Clinical measurements will be recorded at the baseline, 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month of the study. An intraoral digital scanner will be used to measure the dimension changes of the graft at the baseline, after the surgery, 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month of the study. Wound healing will be evaluated on postoperative days 10, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Visual Analog Scale will be used to measure postoperative pain, and the number of painkillers taken will be recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Biruni University
        • Contact:
          • Ayşe Ege SELMAN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Periodontal and peri-implant tissue health
  • Good oral hygiene (plaque accumulation <20%)
  • Either around the functioning implant or in patients scheduled for second-stage surgery following implant surgery <2 mm keratinized gingiva on the vestibular side of the implant
  • No systemic disease and medication use that may affect soft tissue healing.
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic disease that is a contraindication to the surgical procedure,
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7),
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
  • Autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity,
  • Active periodontal disease,
  • Incorrectly positioned implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: smoker
After adequate local anesthesia is achieved, a horizontal incision will be placed at mucogingival junction level to prepare the recipient bed. A split-thickness flap will be raised without disturbing the periosteum. A free gingival graft will be obtained from the palate. The graft will be shaped and sutured to the recipient surface.
Experimental: non-smoker
After adequate local anesthesia is achieved, a horizontal incision will be placed at mucogingival junction level to prepare the recipient bed. A split-thickness flap will be raised without disturbing the periosteum. A free gingival graft will be obtained from the palate. The graft will be shaped and sutured to the recipient surface.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The three-dimensional changes of free gingival graft
Time Frame: Baseline
An intraoral digital scanner will be used to assess the graft's dimensions alterations.
Baseline
The three-dimensional changes of free gingival graft.
Time Frame: 1st month
An intraoral digital scanner will be used to assess the graft's dimensions alterations.
1st month
The three-dimensional changes of free gingival graft
Time Frame: 3rd month
An intraoral digital scanner will be used to assess the graft's dimensions alterations.
3rd month
The three-dimensional changes of free gingival graft
Time Frame: 6th month
An intraoral digital scanner will be used to assess the graft's dimensions alterations.
6th month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to therapy)
The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.
Baseline (prior to therapy)
Probing depth
Time Frame: 1st month
Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.
1st month
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: 1st month
The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.
1st month
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: 3rd month
The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.
3rd month
Keratinized mucosa width
Time Frame: 6th month
The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.
6th month
Probing depth
Time Frame: Baseline
Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.
Baseline
Probing depth
Time Frame: 3rd month
Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.
3rd month
Probing depth
Time Frame: 6th month
Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.
6th month
Wound healing
Time Frame: 10th day
Presence of infection (yes/no), soft tissue dehiscence (yes/no), and graft failure (yes/no) will be recorded.
10th day
Wound healing
Time Frame: 1st month
Presence of infection (yes/no), soft tissue dehiscence (yes/no), and graft failure (yes/no) will be recorded.
1st month
Wound healing
Time Frame: 3rd month
Presence of infection (yes/no), soft tissue dehiscence (yes/no), and graft failure (yes/no) will be recorded.
3rd month
Wound healing
Time Frame: 6th month
Presence of infection (yes/no), soft tissue dehiscence (yes/no), and graft failure (yes/no) will be recorded.
6th month
Patient reported outcomes
Time Frame: 10th day
After the surgical procedure, patients will be asked to complete a form consisting of 4 items: (1) assessment of the intensity of postoperative pain/discomfort (by Visual Analog Scale), (2) duration of pain (in days), (3) number of analgesic tablets taken, and (4) willingness to undergo the same surgery again (yes/no).
10th day
Plaque index
Time Frame: Baseline

0: Absence of microbial plaque

Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

Baseline
Plaque index
Time Frame: 1st month

0: Absence of microbial plaque

Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

1st month
Plaque index
Time Frame: 3rd month

0: Absence of microbial plaque

Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

3rd month
Plaque index
Time Frame: 6th month

0: Absence of microbial plaque

Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

6th month
Gingival Index
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to therapy)

0: normal gingiva

mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

Baseline (prior to therapy)
Gingival Index
Time Frame: 1st month

0: normal gingiva

mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

1st month
Gingival Index
Time Frame: 3rd month

0: normal gingiva

mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

3rd month
Gingival Index
Time Frame: 6th month

0: normal gingiva

mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

6th month
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: Baseline
Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.
Baseline
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 1st month
Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.
1st month
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 3rd month
Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.
3rd month
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 6th month
Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.
6th month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • free gingival graft dimention

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insufficient Keratinized Gingiva

Clinical Trials on Free gingival graft

Subscribe