Positron Emission Tomography in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intervention for Treatment-resistant Depression

A Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intervention for Treatment-Resistant Depression Guided by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Major depressive disorder (MDD) exhibit reduced visual motor perception, which affects prognosis. Metabolic substance changes and abnormal neural activity in the middle temporal visual area (MT) mediate this perceptual dysfunction. The main questions are: •there is no conclusive evidence of impairment of visual motion suppression in treatment-resistant depression (TRD); •it is unknown that functional abnormalities in the MT of TRD patients mediate possible changes in visual perception •lack of treatment for deficit in visual motor perception; •mechanisms behind the intervention process need to be explored. The goal of this clinical trial is to understand the function of visual motor perception in TRD, to validate the effect of the MT on visual motion perception and to explore the effectiveness of the intervention as well as the neurophysiological mechanisms.

This study was planned to •explore any differences in visual motor perception and function of MT between TRD and healthy controls; •analyze the influence of neurobiological changes in MT and related brain regions on visual motion perception; •investigate the effects of rTMS intervention in MT for treatment of impaired visual perception function in TRD; •studying potential therapeutic mechanisms by PET/MRI imaging.

Participants will divide into TRD group and HC group. Clinical symptoms, scales, visual perception suppression index, PET/MRI, electrophysiology and other clinical data were collected at baseline for both two groups. TRD group received high-frequency rTMS stimulation targeting the MT. Besides, psychological scales, visual suppression index, PET/MRI, electrophysiology and other clinical data were collected during the intervention and after treatment.

The researchers will •compare the differences in visual perceptual function and neurobiological characteristics between the TRD group and the HC group in baseline; •analyze the impact of MT and related brain regions in visual motion perception; •compare the suppression index before and after intervention in TRD to discuss the feasibility of rTMS stimulation targeting the MT to improve visual motion perception abnormalities;•utilize the changes in clinical data of PET/MRI and electrophysiology before and after the treatment of TRD group to explore the possible underlying mechanisms during the treatment process.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Receive two or more adequate doses and courses of antidepressant drugs in different mechanisms that were not effective and had been stable for more than 6 weeks on antidepressant medication prior to enrollment, with non-responsiveness defined as a decrease in HAMD-24 score of <50%.
  2. 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24) ≥ 20.
  3. Normal or corrected to normal vision.
  4. Ability to complete spatial suppression psychophysical experiment.
  5. education background above the college degree.
  6. Age 18-45 years, regardless of gender.
  7. Right-handedness.
  8. Han Chinese.
  9. Signed a written informed consent, willing to participate in the study and be evaluated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Co-morbid other mental disorders, including: schizophrenia, mental retardation, substance dependence, etc.
  2. Patients with metal objects in the body or with other contraindications to PET-MRI scanning
  3. Patients with severe or unstable somatic diseases
  4. Women during pregnancy or lactation, and women of childbearing age with positive urine HCG test results during the screening period
  5. Benzodiazepines were taken during the experimental period
  6. Other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, exist that make participation in this clinical trial inappropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Stimulation site: According to the localization of neural orientation navigation system, magnetic resonance data was read in Brainsight software, and three-dimensional brain reconstruction was carried out. The stimulation target was located in the coordinates of Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), which was located in the left middle temporal (-43, -73, 10). Treatment intensity was 100% exercise threshold, continuous 10Hz stimulation, repeated 75 times, that is, 3000 pulses per treatment, 2 times a day, stimulation lasted for 4 seconds with a 26-second interval for 37.5 minutes, continuous stimulation for 5 days, 2 days rest interval, and 5 days of continuous stimulation.

Participants in the active stimulation group will receive the high frequency rTMS to left middle temporal visual area. The left middle temporal visual area will be targeted utilizing the neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 100% of RMT.

Stimulation will be delivered to the left middle temporal visual area using an NTK-TMS-II100 TMS device,is compatible with the Brainsight TMS navigation system.

No Intervention: HC observation
Collect data on healthy controls without stimulation. The subjects get clinical evaluation, blood sample collection, positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance scanning, and electrophysiological monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Suppression Index after treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
Suppression Index (SI) defined as the difference of log10 thresholds for large versus small stimuli of gratings, is able to quantify the suppression strength. The higher the numerical value, the more severe the visual motor perception deficit.
Baseline
Change in Suppression Index after treatment
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Suppression Index (SI) defined as the difference of log10 thresholds for large versus small stimuli of gratings, is able to quantify the suppression strength. The higher the numerical value, the more severe the visual motor perception deficit.
2 weeks
Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items) Total Score Change
Time Frame: Baseline
The Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items), is a 24 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. Higher HAM-D24 score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The higher scores representing more severe levels of depression. Remission is defined as HAM-D24 ≤8. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
Baseline
Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items) Total Score Change
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items), is a 24 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. Higher HAM-D24 score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The higher scores representing more severe levels of depression. Remission is defined as HAM-D24 ≤8. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
2 weeks
Change in synaptic density using positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a fusion of PET and MRI, which integrates pathophysiological changes with morphological structure. Research using PET/MRI in major depression has shown that there are alterations in the snyaptic density of certain brain regions in people with the condition and synaptic dysfunction in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may have implications for the downstream organization of functional networks. The SV2A radioligand [11C]UCB-H can examine snyaptic density in human brain. And brain structure, function connectivity and spectrum of metabolic substances can be measured by MRI. Overall, PET/MRI has advantages for the diagnosis of major depression and the evaluation of treatment effects.
Baseline
Change in synaptic density using positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a fusion of PET and MRI, which integrates pathophysiological changes with morphological structure. Research using PET/MRI in major depression has shown that there are alterations in the snyaptic density of certain brain regions in people with the condition and synaptic dysfunction in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may have implications for the downstream organization of functional networks. The SV2A radioligand [11C]UCB-H can examine snyaptic density in human brain. And brain structure, function connectivity and spectrum of metabolic substances can be measured by MRI. Overall, PET/MRI has advantages for the diagnosis of major depression and the evaluation of treatment effects.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Suppression Index after treatment
Time Frame: 1 week
Suppression Index (SI) defined as the difference of log10 thresholds for large versus small stimuli of gratings, is able to quantify the suppression strength. The higher the numerical value, the more severe the visual motor perception deficit.
1 week
Change in Suppression Index after treatment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Suppression Index (SI) defined as the difference of log10 thresholds for large versus small stimuli of gratings, is able to quantify the suppression strength. The higher the numerical value, the more severe the visual motor perception deficit.
6 weeks
Change in the score of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
Subjective experience of time was measured by the VAS, which consists of a 100-mm vertical line representing the experience of time from slowest (i.e., -50 mm) to fastest (i.e., +50 mm). In this nonverbal dimensional task, subjects were asked to label how fast or slow they experienced the flow of time on the day of the survey.
Baseline
Change in the score of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 week
Subjective experience of time was measured by the VAS, which consists of a 100-mm vertical line representing the experience of time from slowest (i.e., -50 mm) to fastest (i.e., +50 mm). In this nonverbal dimensional task, subjects were asked to label how fast or slow they experienced the flow of time on the day of the survey.
1 week
Change in the score of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Subjective experience of time was measured by the VAS, which consists of a 100-mm vertical line representing the experience of time from slowest (i.e., -50 mm) to fastest (i.e., +50 mm). In this nonverbal dimensional task, subjects were asked to label how fast or slow they experienced the flow of time on the day of the survey.
2 weeks
Change in the score of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Subjective experience of time was measured by the VAS, which consists of a 100-mm vertical line representing the experience of time from slowest (i.e., -50 mm) to fastest (i.e., +50 mm). In this nonverbal dimensional task, subjects were asked to label how fast or slow they experienced the flow of time on the day of the survey.
6 weeks
Change in the score of Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale (MARS) is designed to assess psychomotor deficits in depressed patients and consists of five major body categories including eyes, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. The severity of each item ranges from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. It takes an estimated 10 to 15 minutes to complete the assessment. The descriptions and explanations of the items are intended to be simple and practical.
Baseline
Change in the score of Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale
Time Frame: 1 week
The Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale (MARS) is designed to assess psychomotor deficits in depressed patients and consists of five major body categories including eyes, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. The severity of each item ranges from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. It takes an estimated 10 to 15 minutes to complete the assessment. The descriptions and explanations of the items are intended to be simple and practical.
1 week
Change in the score of Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale (MARS) is designed to assess psychomotor deficits in depressed patients and consists of five major body categories including eyes, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. The severity of each item ranges from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. It takes an estimated 10 to 15 minutes to complete the assessment. The descriptions and explanations of the items are intended to be simple and practical.
2 weeks
Change in the score of Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale (MARS) is designed to assess psychomotor deficits in depressed patients and consists of five major body categories including eyes, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. The severity of each item ranges from 1 to 4, with 4 being the most severe. It takes an estimated 10 to 15 minutes to complete the assessment. The descriptions and explanations of the items are intended to be simple and practical.
6 weeks
Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items) Total Score Change
Time Frame: 1 weeks
The Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items), is a 24 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. Higher HAM-D24 score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The higher scores representing more severe levels of depression. Remission is defined as HAM-D24 ≤8. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
1 weeks
Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items) Total Score Change
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Hamilton Depression Scale (24-items), is a 24 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. Higher HAM-D24 score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The higher scores representing more severe levels of depression. Remission is defined as HAM-D24 ≤8. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response.
6 weeks
Change in the rate of Hamilton Anxiety Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline
Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 17 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of anxiety episodes in patients. Each item on the scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with the total score ranging from 0 to 68. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The HAMA-17 is often used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for anxiety. It is a more comprehensive version of the HAMA that includes additional items to capture a broader range of anxiety symptoms.
Baseline
Change in the rate of Hamilton Anxiety Scale score
Time Frame: 1 week
Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 17 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of anxiety episodes in patients. Each item on the scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with the total score ranging from 0 to 68. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The HAMA-17 is often used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for anxiety. It is a more comprehensive version of the HAMA that includes additional items to capture a broader range of anxiety symptoms.
1 week
Change in the rate of Hamilton Anxiety Scale score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 17 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of anxiety episodes in patients. Each item on the scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with the total score ranging from 0 to 68. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The HAMA-17 is often used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for anxiety. It is a more comprehensive version of the HAMA that includes additional items to capture a broader range of anxiety symptoms.
2 weeks
Change in the rate of Hamilton Anxiety Scale score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Hamilton Anxiety Scale is a 17 item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of anxiety episodes in patients. Each item on the scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with the total score ranging from 0 to 68. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The HAMA-17 is often used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for anxiety. It is a more comprehensive version of the HAMA that includes additional items to capture a broader range of anxiety symptoms.
6 weeks
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale is a tool to assess pleasure deficit in depressed patients. A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score from 14 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit.
Baseline
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 1 week
The Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale is a tool to assess pleasure deficit in depressed patients. A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score from 14 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit.
1 week
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale is a tool to assess pleasure deficit in depressed patients. A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score from 14 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit.
2 weeks
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale is a tool to assess pleasure deficit in depressed patients. A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score from 14 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit.
6 weeks
Change in the rate of Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation score
Time Frame: Baseline
Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation is a 21-item self-report instrument that detects and measures the intensity of a patient's specific attitudes, behaviors, and suicide plans during the past week. The BSI score ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes and lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Baseline
Change in the rate of Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation score
Time Frame: 1 week
Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation is a 21-item self-report instrument that detects and measures the intensity of a patient's specific attitudes, behaviors, and suicide plans during the past week. The BSI score ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes and lower scores indicating better outcomes.
1 week
Change in the rate of Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation is a 21-item self-report instrument that detects and measures the intensity of a patient's specific attitudes, behaviors, and suicide plans during the past week. The BSI score ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes and lower scores indicating better outcomes.
2 weeks
Change in the rate of Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation is a 21-item self-report instrument that detects and measures the intensity of a patient's specific attitudes, behaviors, and suicide plans during the past week. The BSI score ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes and lower scores indicating better outcomes.
6 weeks
Change in the Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline
The Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale (LEIS) was one of the first instruments successfully used to assess emotional retardation due to SSRI. The scale is a self-report scale designed to evaluate a subject's emotional intensity rather than frequency. The assessment consists of 18 questions on a 5-point scale assessing the subject's emotional state compared to "usual". The total score ranges from -36 to 36, representing very low to very high emotional intensity.
Baseline
Change in the Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale score
Time Frame: 1 week
The Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale (LEIS) was one of the first instruments successfully used to assess emotional retardation due to SSRI. The scale is a self-report scale designed to evaluate a subject's emotional intensity rather than frequency. The assessment consists of 18 questions on a 5-point scale assessing the subject's emotional state compared to "usual". The total score ranges from -36 to 36, representing very low to very high emotional intensity.
1 week
Change in the Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale (LEIS) was one of the first instruments successfully used to assess emotional retardation due to SSRI. The scale is a self-report scale designed to evaluate a subject's emotional intensity rather than frequency. The assessment consists of 18 questions on a 5-point scale assessing the subject's emotional state compared to "usual". The total score ranges from -36 to 36, representing very low to very high emotional intensity.
2 weeks
Change in the Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Laukes Emotional Intensity Scale (LEIS) was one of the first instruments successfully used to assess emotional retardation due to SSRI. The scale is a self-report scale designed to evaluate a subject's emotional intensity rather than frequency. The assessment consists of 18 questions on a 5-point scale assessing the subject's emotional state compared to "usual". The total score ranges from -36 to 36, representing very low to very high emotional intensity.
6 weeks
Change in the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale-Mixed Subscale score
Time Frame: Baseline
The Useful Depression Outcome Scale-Mixed Subscale (CUDOS-M) is a revised scale based on the CUDOS with items added and subtracted, combining the criteria for evaluating typical manic/hypomanic episodes and depressive episodes; it is a self-assessment scale used for prognostic assessment of patients with depressive disorders with 13 rating items. Total score from 0 to 52, the higher the score the more serious the situation is.
Baseline
Change in the score of THINC-it
Time Frame: Baseline
THINC-it is a computerized cognitive screening tool that is designed to assess cognitive function in adults. THINC-it stands for "THINking Clearly," and it consist of 1 subjective (5-item Cognitive Impairment in Depression Questionnaire) and 4 objective (Choice Reaction Time, 1-Back Memory Task, Digit Symbol Replacement Test, and the Connectivity Test). The tool is administered on a tablet or computer, and it takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Baseline
Change in the score of THINC-it
Time Frame: 1 week
THINC-it is a computerized cognitive screening tool that is designed to assess cognitive function in adults. THINC-it stands for "THINking Clearly," and it consist of 1 subjective (5-item Cognitive Impairment in Depression Questionnaire) and 4 objective (Choice Reaction Time, 1-Back Memory Task, Digit Symbol Replacement Test, and the Connectivity Test). The tool is administered on a tablet or computer, and it takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
1 week
Change in the score of THINC-it
Time Frame: 2 weeks
THINC-it is a computerized cognitive screening tool that is designed to assess cognitive function in adults. THINC-it stands for "THINking Clearly," and it consist of 1 subjective (5-item Cognitive Impairment in Depression Questionnaire) and 4 objective (Choice Reaction Time, 1-Back Memory Task, Digit Symbol Replacement Test, and the Connectivity Test). The tool is administered on a tablet or computer, and it takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
2 weeks
Change in the score of THINC-it
Time Frame: 6 weeks
THINC-it is a computerized cognitive screening tool that is designed to assess cognitive function in adults. THINC-it stands for "THINking Clearly," and it consist of 1 subjective (5-item Cognitive Impairment in Depression Questionnaire) and 4 objective (Choice Reaction Time, 1-Back Memory Task, Digit Symbol Replacement Test, and the Connectivity Test). The tool is administered on a tablet or computer, and it takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
6 weeks
Change in electroencephalogram
Time Frame: Baseline
Electroencephalogram is collected from 64 electrodes. EEG can be used to identify patterns of brain activity that are associated with the condition and to inform treatment decisions. EEG can be a useful tool for identifying patterns of brain activity that are associated with TRD and for guiding treatment decisions. Neurofeedback and TMS are two approaches that have shown promise in the treatment of TRD. several parameters are analyzed to identify patterns of brain activity that may be associated with the condition. These parameters include: Alpha power, Beta power, Theta power, Delta power, Coherence, and more.
Baseline
Change in electroencephalogram
Time Frame: 1 week
Electroencephalogram is collected from 64 electrodes. EEG can be used to identify patterns of brain activity that are associated with the condition and to inform treatment decisions. EEG can be a useful tool for identifying patterns of brain activity that are associated with TRD and for guiding treatment decisions. Neurofeedback and TMS are two approaches that have shown promise in the treatment of TRD. several parameters are analyzed to identify patterns of brain activity that may be associated with the condition. These parameters include: Alpha power, Beta power, Theta power, Delta power, Coherence, and more.
1 week
Change in electroencephalogram
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Electroencephalogram is collected from 64 electrodes. EEG can be used to identify patterns of brain activity that are associated with the condition and to inform treatment decisions. EEG can be a useful tool for identifying patterns of brain activity that are associated with TRD and for guiding treatment decisions. Neurofeedback and TMS are two approaches that have shown promise in the treatment of TRD. several parameters are analyzed to identify patterns of brain activity that may be associated with the condition. These parameters include: Alpha power, Beta power, Theta power, Delta power, Coherence, and more.
2 weeks
Change in electroencephalogram
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Electroencephalogram is collected from 64 electrodes. EEG can be used to identify patterns of brain activity that are associated with the condition and to inform treatment decisions. EEG can be a useful tool for identifying patterns of brain activity that are associated with TRD and for guiding treatment decisions. Neurofeedback and TMS are two approaches that have shown promise in the treatment of TRD. several parameters are analyzed to identify patterns of brain activity that may be associated with the condition. These parameters include: Alpha power, Beta power, Theta power, Delta power, Coherence, and more.
6 weeks
Change in the TMS-EEG data
Time Frame: Baseline
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces changes in cortical plasticity that can persist long after the end of stimulation. EEG is the sum of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, reflecting the rhythmic activity of neurons in the cerebral cortex.The stimulus response characteristics of TMS-EEG can be used to measure the cortical effects induced by TMS, to explore the functions of various brain regions, to correlate the causal relationship of inter-brain interactions, as well as to diagnose and treat depression based on abnormal response characteristics.
Baseline
Change in the TMS-EEG data
Time Frame: 1 week
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces changes in cortical plasticity that can persist long after the end of stimulation. EEG is the sum of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, reflecting the rhythmic activity of neurons in the cerebral cortex.The stimulus response characteristics of TMS-EEG can be used to measure the cortical effects induced by TMS, to explore the functions of various brain regions, to correlate the causal relationship of inter-brain interactions, as well as to diagnose and treat depression based on abnormal response characteristics.
1 week
Change in the TMS-EEG data
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces changes in cortical plasticity that can persist long after the end of stimulation. EEG is the sum of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, reflecting the rhythmic activity of neurons in the cerebral cortex.The stimulus response characteristics of TMS-EEG can be used to measure the cortical effects induced by TMS, to explore the functions of various brain regions, to correlate the causal relationship of inter-brain interactions, as well as to diagnose and treat depression based on abnormal response characteristics.
2 weeks
IL-6 level
Time Frame: Baseline
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
Baseline
IL-6 level
Time Frame: 1 week
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
1 week
IL-6 level
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
2 weeks
IL-6 level
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment Resistant Depression

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Subscribe