Investigation of the Effects of Sleep Fragmentation on Itch and Pain Sensitivity

January 26, 2024 updated by: Silvia Lo Vecchio, Aalborg University

Investigation of the Effects of Sleep Provocations on Itch and Pain Sensitivity

In This experiment, the investigators would like to test following hypotheses regarding the influence of sleep fragmentation on itch:

  • To investigate similarity and differences between itch and pain by comparing the effect of sleep deprivation in them.
  • To evaluate the inflammatory state induced by sleep fragmentation via the analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from blood samples.
  • To correlate the anxiety and depression scores (evaluated through questionnaires) with itch and pain sensitivity and evaluate how they are affected by sleep fragmentation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic itch affects approximately a fifth of the global population and is associated with substantial negative consequences for the affected individuals. Furthermore, there is a lack of efficient treatment options for chronic itch.

Poor sleep is a common companion of itch and is often reported by patients with chronic itch. Poor sleep is often characterized by nightly awakenings and troubles falling asleep. This is a significant problem as poor sleep in general is associated with lowered quality of life. While previous research has already established the negative impact of itch on sleep, it is yet to be studied whether the opposite tendency might be true as well. Knowledge about patients with chronic pain has shown that poor sleep can increase the sensitivity to pain and inflammation, and this tendency can also be observed in healthy participants after experimental sleep provocations.

Therefore, the investigators wish to investigate how sleep provocations affect markers of itch in healthy participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Silvia Lo Vecchio
  • Phone Number: +4521397785
  • Email: slv@hst.aau.dk

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Silvia Kjær-Staal Lo Vecchio
  • Phone Number: +4521397785
  • Email: slv@hst.aau.dk

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9620
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy men and women
  • 18-60 years
  • Speak and understand English
  • Access to a smartphone during the experimental nights

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Drug addiction defined as any use of cannabis, opioids, or other drugs
  • Previous or current history of neurological, dermatological, immunological musculoskeletal, cardiac disorder or mental illnesses (psychiatric diagnosis) that may affect the results (e.g., neuropathy, muscular pain in the upper extremities, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia etc.)
  • Moles, wounds, scars, or tattoos in the area to be treated or tested
  • Current use of medications that may affect the trial such as antihistamines and pain killers.
  • Skin diseases
  • Consumption of alcohol or painkillers 24 hours before the study days and between these
  • Acute or chronic pain and itch
  • Participation in other trials within 1 week of study entry (4 weeks in the case of pharmaceutical studies)
  • Lack of ability to cooperate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sleep fragmentation
This subproject will be conducted in two sessions separated by three nights of sleep fragmentation. Each session will last approximately 2 hours. At the beginning of the first visit and after the last visit, 9 ml of blood will be drawn, and plasma will be isolated. After plasma isolation, the CRP concentration will be analyzed. In each forearm of the participant, a 4x4 cm area will be selected as Area of Interest (AOI). In these selected areas, itch will be induced in both sessions using histamine and cowhage and several tests will be conducted.
Histaminergic itch will be evoked by a 1% histamine solution. A droplet of histamine solution will be placed on the predetermined area on the forearm, and the SPT lancet will be pierced through the histamine with 120 g of pressure for 1-2 seconds
25 spicules will be inserted in the centre of the predefined skin area on the mandibular area. The spicules will be gently rubbed for 15-20 seconds in circular motion to facilitate epidermal penetration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of itch
Time Frame: Day 1: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Immediately following the itch provocations, participants will be instructed to rate the itch intensity for 10 minutes using a digital visual analogue scale (VAS; eVAS Software: Aalborg, University, Denmark), on a tablet. The scale will be measured from 0 to 100, where 0 represents 'no itch' and 100 'worst itch imaginable'.
Day 1: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Assessment of itch
Time Frame: Day 2: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Immediately following the itch provocations, participants will be instructed to rate the itch intensity for 10 minutes using a digital visual analogue scale (VAS; eVAS Software: Aalborg, University, Denmark), on a tablet. The scale will be measured from 0 to 100, where 0 represents 'no itch' and 100 'worst itch imaginable'.
Day 2: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Assessment of pain
Time Frame: Day 1: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Immediately following the itch provocations, participants will be instructed to rate the pain intensity for 10 minutes using a digital visual analogue scale (VAS; eVAS Software: Aalborg, University, Denmark), on a tablet. The scale will be measured from 0 to 100, where 0 represents 'no pain' and 100 'worst pain imaginable'.
Day 1: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Assessment of pain
Time Frame: Day 2: 1 minute after every itch inductions
Immediately following the itch provocations, participants will be instructed to rate the pain intensity for 10 minutes using a digital visual analogue scale (VAS; eVAS Software: Aalborg, University, Denmark), on a tablet. The scale will be measured from 0 to 100, where 0 represents 'no pain' and 100 'worst pain imaginable'.
Day 2: 1 minute after every itch inductions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microvascular reactivity
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The evoked cutaneous inflammation (quantified by superficial blood perfusion) will be measured by full-field laser perfusion imaging.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Microvascular reactivity
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The evoked cutaneous inflammation (quantified by superficial blood perfusion) will be measured by full-field laser perfusion imaging.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Touch Pleasantness (TP)
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pleasant touch sensation measured using a standardized sensory brush (SENSELab Brush-05, Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden) exerting a force of 200 to 400 mN. The stimulation consists of three strokes (2 cm in length) over the treated/control areas. The strokes will be applied perpendicularly to the skin and the subject will rate the sensation induced by the brush on a NRS scale labeled "very unpleasant" and "very pleasant" at the extremity and "neutral" at the center.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Touch Pleasantness (TP)
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pleasant touch sensation measured using a standardized sensory brush (SENSELab Brush-05, Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden) exerting a force of 200 to 400 mN. The stimulation consists of three strokes (2 cm in length) over the treated/control areas. The strokes will be applied perpendicularly to the skin and the subject will rate the sensation induced by the brush on a NRS scale labeled "very unpleasant" and "very pleasant" at the extremity and "neutral" at the center.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanically evoked itch (MEI), intensity approach
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
MEI is measured by using mildly pruritic, non-painful von Frey nylon filaments of a predetermined intensity (generally 5-30 miliNewton of force). This stimulator is moved in intervals of 0.5 cm outside the area of itch provocation.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanically evoked itch (MEI), intensity approach
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
MEI is measured by using mildly pruritic, non-painful von Frey nylon filaments of a predetermined intensity (generally 5-30 miliNewton of force). This stimulator is moved in intervals of 0.5 cm outside the area of itch provocation.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanically evoked itch, spatial approach
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The von-Frey filament that better evokes the itch sensation during the assessment of mechanically evoked itch as well as a template of soft plastic are used to map the area of hyperkinesis in the test areas (forearms)
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanically evoked itch, spatial approach
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The von-Frey filament that better evokes the itch sensation during the assessment of mechanically evoked itch as well as a template of soft plastic are used to map the area of hyperkinesis in the test areas (forearms)
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanical Pain Thresholds (MPT)
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
This test is conducted using a pinprick set (Aalborg University, Aalborg). The set consists of 7 needles each with a diameter of 0.6 mm and different force applications: 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 mN.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanical Pain Thresholds (MPT)
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
This test is conducted using a pinprick set (Aalborg University, Aalborg). The set consists of 7 needles each with a diameter of 0.6 mm and different force applications: 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 mN.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS), intensity approach
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
This test is conducted with the same pinprick set used to test the MPT. Starting with the lightest, each stimulator is applied at a rate of 2 s on, 2 s off in an ascending order, and the subject will be asked to give a pain rating for each stimulus on a scale from 0-10 (where 0 indicates ''no pain'', and 10 indicates the ''worst imaginable pain'').
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS), intensity approach
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
This test is conducted with the same pinprick set used to test the MPT. Starting with the lightest, each stimulator is applied at a rate of 2 s on, 2 s off in an ascending order, and the subject will be asked to give a pain rating for each stimulus on a scale from 0-10 (where 0 indicates ''no pain'', and 10 indicates the ''worst imaginable pain'').
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Cold Detection Thresholds (CDT) and heat (HPT) detection
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Thermal cold and heat stimuli will be applied by a contact heat-evoked potential stimulator (PATHWAYS; Medoc Ltd, Ramat Yishai, Israel), placed 5 cm distal to the elbow on the right dorsal forearm
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Cold Detection Thresholds (CDT) and heat (HPT) detection
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Thermal cold and heat stimuli will be applied by a contact heat-evoked potential stimulator (PATHWAYS; Medoc Ltd, Ramat Yishai, Israel), placed 5 cm distal to the elbow on the right dorsal forearm
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Cold Detection Thresholds (CDT) and heat (HPT) pain thresholds
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Thermal cold and heat stimuli will be applied by a contact heat-evoked potential stimulator (PATHWAYS; Medoc Ltd, Ramat Yishai, Israel), placed 5 cm distal to the elbow on the right dorsal forearm
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Cold Detection Thresholds (CDT) and heat (HPT) pain thresholds
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Thermal cold and heat stimuli will be applied by a contact heat-evoked potential stimulator (PATHWAYS; Medoc Ltd, Ramat Yishai, Israel), placed 5 cm distal to the elbow on the right dorsal forearm
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pain to Supra-threshold Heat Stimuli (STHS)
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The tests will be conducted by using a PATHWAY ATS (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device. A thermode stimulator of 3x3 cm will be placed on the treated/placebo areas and kept in place by means of Velcro tape. The subjects will rate the pain to three suprathreshold heat pain stimuli (starting and ending at 32°C with an increase and decrease of 5°C and 3 s plateau at 50°C).
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pain to Supra-threshold Heat Stimuli (STHS)
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The tests will be conducted by using a PATHWAY ATS (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device. A thermode stimulator of 3x3 cm will be placed on the treated/placebo areas and kept in place by means of Velcro tape. The subjects will rate the pain to three suprathreshold heat pain stimuli (starting and ending at 32°C with an increase and decrease of 5°C and 3 s plateau at 50°C).
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Deep-tissue Pain Sensitivity Measurements
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Deep-tissue pain sensitivity will be evaluated by cuff pressure stimuli using a computer-controlled cuff algometer (Cortex Technology and Aalborg University, Denmark) including a 13-cm wide tourniquet cuff (VBM, Sulz, Germany) and an electronic visual analog scale (VAS) (Aalborg University, Denmark) for recording of the pain intensity.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Deep-tissue Pain Sensitivity Measurements
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Deep-tissue pain sensitivity will be evaluated by cuff pressure stimuli using a computer-controlled cuff algometer (Cortex Technology and Aalborg University, Denmark) including a 13-cm wide tourniquet cuff (VBM, Sulz, Germany) and an electronic visual analog scale (VAS) (Aalborg University, Denmark) for recording of the pain intensity.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pressure Detection and Tolerance Threshold
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The pressure will be increased by 1 kPa/s and the subject will be instructed to rate the pain intensity continuously on the electronic VAS until the tolerance level is reached.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Pressure Detection and Tolerance Threshold
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The pressure will be increased by 1 kPa/s and the subject will be instructed to rate the pain intensity continuously on the electronic VAS until the tolerance level is reached.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Temporal Summation of Pain - TSP
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
A total of 10 repeated mechanical pressure stimuli at the PTT level will be delivered at 0.5 Hz (1 s stimulus duration and 1 s interval between stimuli) to the lower leg. A constant pressure of 5 kPa will be applied between the individual pressure stimuli to avoid movement of the cuff. During the 10 repeated stimuli, the subject will continuously rate the pain intensity on a 10 cm continuous VAS.
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Temporal Summation of Pain - TSP
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
A total of 10 repeated mechanical pressure stimuli at the PTT level will be delivered at 0.5 Hz (1 s stimulus duration and 1 s interval between stimuli) to the lower leg. A constant pressure of 5 kPa will be applied between the individual pressure stimuli to avoid movement of the cuff. During the 10 repeated stimuli, the subject will continuously rate the pain intensity on a 10 cm continuous VAS.
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Conditioned Pain Modulation - CPM
Time Frame: Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The concept of CPM is that a tonic painful stimulus (conditioning stimulus) will inhibit pain evoked simultaneously from another site (test stimulus). The painful conditioned stimulus will be applied simultaneously with the assessment stimulus. The conditioned stimulus will be terminated right after the subject presses the stop button. CPM will be defined as the difference between stimulus during and before the conditioned pain (i.e., "during" minus "before").
Day 1: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Conditioned Pain Modulation - CPM
Time Frame: Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
The concept of CPM is that a tonic painful stimulus (conditioning stimulus) will inhibit pain evoked simultaneously from another site (test stimulus). The painful conditioned stimulus will be applied simultaneously with the assessment stimulus. The conditioned stimulus will be terminated right after the subject presses the stop button. CPM will be defined as the difference between stimulus during and before the conditioned pain (i.e., "during" minus "before").
Day 2: 10 minutes after every itch inductions
Blood Sampling for C-Reactive Protein Analysis
Time Frame: Day 1
Whole blood samples will be collected from the antecubital vein using a vacutainer blood collection device (S-Monovette, Sarstedt) with a 21-gauge needle.
Day 1
Blood Sampling for C-Reactive Protein Analysis
Time Frame: Day 2
Whole blood samples will be collected from the antecubital vein using a vacutainer blood collection device (S-Monovette, Sarstedt) with a 21-gauge needle.
Day 2
The Itch Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
The itch catastrophizing scale is a modified version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), which is a validated questionnaire measuring pain-related thoughts and feelings. The questionnaire consists of 13 items measuring itch-related thoughts and feelings. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from zero to four, corresponding to thinking/feeling that way during itch 'not at all' and 'very much', respectively.
Day 1
The Itch Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Day 2
The itch catastrophizing scale is a modified version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), which is a validated questionnaire measuring pain-related thoughts and feelings. The questionnaire consists of 13 items measuring itch-related thoughts and feelings. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from zero to four, corresponding to thinking/feeling that way during itch 'not at all' and 'very much', respectively.
Day 2
The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Day 1
The PSQI consists of 19 items generating seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The seven component scores can be summarized in a global score ranging from zero to 21 with higher scores reflecting a worse overall quality of sleep.
Day 1
The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Day 2
The PSQI consists of 19 items generating seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The seven component scores can be summarized in a global score ranging from zero to 21 with higher scores reflecting a worse overall quality of sleep.
Day 2
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Day 1
The HADS consists of 14 items with two 7-item subscales measuring anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale with zero to three with each subscale ranging from zero to 21. Within both subscales, the scoring is grouped into either normal (0-7), borderline abnormal (8-10), and abnormal (11-21).
Day 1
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Day 2
The HADS consists of 14 items with two 7-item subscales measuring anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale with zero to three with each subscale ranging from zero to 21. Within both subscales, the scoring is grouped into either normal (0-7), borderline abnormal (8-10), and abnormal (11-21).
Day 2
Positive and Negative Affective Schedule
Time Frame: Day 1
This 20-item instrument is a psychometric self-report test to assess affect (10 items for positive affect and 10 items for negative affect) and validated for the use in adolescents and adults.
Day 1
Positive and Negative Affective Schedule
Time Frame: Day 2
This 20-item instrument is a psychometric self-report test to assess affect (10 items for positive affect and 10 items for negative affect) and validated for the use in adolescents and adults.
Day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Fragmentation

Clinical Trials on Histamine

3
Subscribe