- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06099743
ASCENT Intervention for Brain Tumor Patients
An ACT-Based Supportive Intervention for Patients With Central Nervous System Tumors
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, population-specific intervention designed to help patients with newly diagnosed malignant brain tumors cope with their illness.
This project is currently recruiting participants for intervention refinement activities in preparation for the pilot RCT. For intervention refinement, we are enrolling 15 stakeholders and 10 open pilot participants to gather feedback about the intervention to improve it prior to commencing the randomized controlled trial. The stakeholder feedback and open pilot refinement phase of the study is critical for intervention refinement for the RCT. The investigators will then evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the refined ASCENT intervention versus usual care in this pilot randomized controlled trial (n=100). The investigators will also estimate preliminary effects of ASCENT on psychological and behavioral outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Deborah A Forst, MD
- Phone Number: 617-724-4000
- Email: dforst@mgb.org
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Recruiting
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
-
Principal Investigator:
- Deborah Forst, MD
-
Contact:
- Deborah Forst, MD
- Phone Number: 617-726-2000
- Email: dforst@partners.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Patient
- Within 6 months of diagnosis of malignant primary Central Nervous System (CNS) tumor
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent as assessed by the study team (e.g., due to severe cognitive impairment/dementia)
- Moderate to severe receptive aphasia (Quick Aphasia Battery sentence comprehension subscale < 8)
- Current or imminent hospice enrollment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pilot RCT: ASCENT Arm
Enrolled patients will receive an intervention manual and will participate in six weekly or biweekly individual sessions with a clinician (e.g. nurse or behavioral health specialist). Participants will be asked to complete surveys at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks. |
Intervention manual and six one-on-one coaching sessions.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Pilot RCT: Control Arm
Participants will receive usual supportive care, which includes referral to cancer center supportive care services (e.g., social work) upon request from the patient, caregiver, or clinician. Participants will be asked to complete surveys at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks. |
Referral to cancer center supportive care services (e.g., social work) as needed, upon request from the patient, caregiver, or clinician.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the Intervention: Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Enroll and Participate in the Intervention
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
The investigators will assess feasibility by examining the percentage of eligible patients who agree to enroll in the study and the percentage of enrolled patients who participate in all six intervention sessions.
The intervention will be deemed feasible if at least 60% of eligible patients enroll in the study and if at least 70% of enrolled patients complete at least half of the sessions.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention: Percentage of Participants who Have High Satisfaction with the Intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The investigators will assess acceptability via examining the distribution of patient scores for the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).
CSQ-8 scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
The intervention will be deemed acceptable if at least 70% of patients score at least 24 points on the CSQ-8.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploratory: Coping Skills
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of ASCENT on coping skills using the Measure of Current Status (MOCS) Part A. The MOCS Part A is a 13-item measure of self-perceived coping skills with scores ranging from 0-52 with higher scores indicating higher self-perceived coping skills.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Values-driven behavior
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of the ASCENT intervention on values driven behavior using the Valued Living Questionnaire (VLQ).
In this questionnaire, respondents rate the importance of 10 domains of living and their consistency living in accordance with those values in the past week.
Scores range from 10-100 with higher scores indicating a value with more importance.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Prognostic distress
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of the ASCENT intervention on prognostic awareness using the Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale (PAIS).
This 34-item questionnaire measures three domains: cognitive understanding of prognosis, emotional coping with prognosis, and adaptive response (i.e., the capacity to use prognostic awareness to inform life decisions).
The cognitive understanding domain consists of two items including a question asking patients if their oncologist has said that their cancer is curable and a question asking patients to report the likelihood that they would be cured of their cancer, assessed on a 7-point scale ranging from no chance/0% to extremely likely/>90%.
The emotional coping domain consists of eight items, with a score range of 0-24, with higher scores indicating better emotional coping with prognosis.
The adaptive response domain consists of 12 items, with a score range of 0-36, with higher scores indicating better adaptive response to prognosis
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Depression symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of the ASCENT intervention on depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire -8 (PHQ-8) The PHQ-8 is an 8 item measure with scores ranging from 0-24 and higher scores indicating more severe depression.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Quality of Life
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of ASCENT on symptom burden and quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-Br).
The FACT-Br is a 50-item tool consisting of four subscales assessing well-being across four domains (physical, functional, emotional, and social), as well as additional questions specific to patients with brain tumors.
Scores range from 0-200 with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Loneliness
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of ASCENT on loneliness and social isolation using the 20 item UCLA Loneliness Scale with scores ranging from 20-80 and higher scores indicating more loneliness.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Exploratory: Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
The investigators will explore the effect of the ASCENT intervention on depression symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire.
The GAD-7 has scores ranging from 0-21 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Deborah A Forst, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-436
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Deidentified participant data will be made available to the public via openICPSR (Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research).
Raw interview data may contain potentially identifiable contextual material, the study will not share raw interview data to preserve confidentiality. All other data (de-identified demographic information, de-identified clinical data, participant survey responses, and coded interview data) will be preserved and shared. Respondent identifiers will not be shared.
Data to be made publicly available will include the study protocol, the semi-structured exit interview guide, data collection instruments, and a codebook describing relevant features of measured variables (e.g., variable name, related survey questions and possible responses, codes for missing values). The codebook will be accompanied by univariate descriptive statistics for variables. A User Guide will be made accessible with descriptions of data and instructions for interpretation.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
In accordance with the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Trial Access Policy, results will be made publicly accessible within 12 months of the study completion date or 12 months of final subject data collection (whichever comes first).
Data will remain available for as long as the repository is in existence.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Glioma
-
University of California, San FranciscoPacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology ConsortiumRecruitingPediatric Cancer | Low-grade Glioma | Low Grade Glioma of Brain | Recurrent Low Grade GliomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Active, not recruitingRecurrent Glioblastoma | Recurrent Malignant Glioma | Refractory Malignant Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade III Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade II Glioma | Refractory Glioblastoma | Refractory WHO Grade II Glioma | Refractory WHO Grade III GliomaUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBlue Earth Diagnostics; Dragon Master FoundationRecruitingGlioma | Low-grade Glioma | Glioma, Malignant | Low Grade Glioma of Brain | Glioma IntracranialUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruitingWHO Grade 3 Glioma | Recurrent Malignant Glioma | WHO Grade 2 Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade 3 Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade 4 Glioma | WHO Grade 4 GliomaUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBlue Earth Diagnostics; Dragon Master FoundationRecruitingGlioma | High Grade Glioma | Glioma, Malignant | Diffuse Glioma | Glioma IntracranialUnited States
-
ChimerixOncoceutics, Inc.TerminatedGlioblastoma | Diffuse Midline Glioma | H3 K27M Glioma | Thalamic Glioma | Infratentorial Glioma | Basal Ganglia GliomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGlioblastoma | Malignant Glioma | WHO Grade III Glioma | Recurrent Glioma | Refractory GliomaUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBeiGene USA, Inc.Active, not recruitingGlioblastoma | Malignant Glioma | Recurrent Glioblastoma | Recurrent WHO Grade III Glioma | WHO Grade III Glioma | IDH2 Gene Mutation | IDH1 Gene Mutation | Low Grade Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade II Glioma | WHO Grade II GliomaUnited States
-
Sabine Mueller, MD, PhDNot yet recruitingGlioblastoma | Diffuse Midline Glioma, H3 K27M-Mutant | High-grade Glioma | High-Grade Glioma (WHO III-IV) | Diffuse Hemispheric Glioma, H3G34 MutantUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)SuspendedGlioma | High Grade Glioma | Malignant Glioma | Gliomas | Low Grade GliomaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Psychosocial intervention
-
University of Southern MississippiMy Brother's KeeperCompletedCardiovascular DiseasesUnited States
-
IVI SevillaIVI MadridCompletedAnxiety Depression | Psychosocial Stressor | Infertility Primary
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Terminated
-
College of Professional and Continuing Education...SuspendedInsomnia | Randomised Controlled TrialHong Kong
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsCompletedGestational Diabetes MellitusSwitzerland
-
Sykehuset Innlandet HFNorwegian Medical AssociationCompleted
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMalignant Neoplasm | Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its TreatmentUnited States
-
Teesside UniversityUniversity of Manchester; Jos University Teaching HospitalNot yet recruitingStress | Anxiety | Trauma | Depression, Anxiety | Child Behaviour | Woman Abuse | Parenting Intervention
-
Duke UniversityCompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
The Mediterranean Institute for the Advance of...Carlos III Health Institute; Andaluz Health Service; Preventive Services and...Completed