Can a Patient in Intensive Care be Visited by His or Her Pet? (ACCOMPAGNE)

Can a Patient in Intensive Care be Visited by His or Her Pet? Feasibility Study.

Nearly half of all intensive care patients describe symptoms of anxiety and depression after a stay in the ICU, and one in five has genuine post-traumatic stress disorder.

As a result, improving patient experience has become a priority in the ICU, and particular attention is being paid to the need to recreate a familiar environment.

Animal-mediated interventions have been developed for a number of patients over many years. These strategies are widely used with elderly patients, and patients with cognitive or psychiatric disorders, for whom the literature shows benefits on anxiety, mood or objective signs of stress.

In the vast majority of experiments carried out to date, the animals (mainly dogs) were prepared and educated for contact with patients, and their handlers trained in this activity, rather like guide dogs. Visiting a care facility with a patient's own pet is rarely described. It may run up against obstacles related to the animal's behavior or infectious risks, but it is nevertheless authorized in many establishments.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Conscious adult patients with a pet (dog/cat).
  • Patients with no or no longer hemodynamic or respiratory failure, or undergoing rehabilitation, after resolution of the acute phase or at the end of life.
  • Patients affiliated to or entitled under a social security scheme.
  • Patient who has given written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-stabilized acute situation (as assessed by the resuscitator).
  • Mechanical or amine ventilation or extrarenal purification.
  • Tracheostomy.
  • Immunosuppression.
  • Carriage of multi-resistant bacteria.
  • Behavioral or consciousness disorders.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Skin wounds, extensive burns exceeding 15% of body surface area, external fixator.
  • Guardianship or trusteeship.
  • Workload incompatible with the visit
  • Patient unable to speak French.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pet visit
Intensive care patients visited by their pets for 20 minutes
Intensive care patients visited by their pets for 20 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of visiting the pets
Time Frame: Day 15
The feasibility of visiting the pets of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit will be measured by the proportion of patients included in the study for whom at least one visit with their pet was possible. A visit will be considered to have taken place as soon as the patient has had contact with his or her pet.
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PANAS
Time Frame: Day 1
The impact of the animal's visit on the patient's mood will be assessed by variations in the scale Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). This self-report scale measures positive (PA) and negative (NA) affect, and is made up of 20 items, 10 of which assess PA and 10 of which assess NA. Each item refers to an adjective, and responses are classified on a 5-point Likert scale, according to how the person felt about the emotion described by the adjective. For each patient, the variation in AP and NA is calculated as follows: (score after visit-score before visit)/score before visit.
Day 1
Paramedical care
Time Frame: Day 1

The evaluation of the paramedical care load will be assessed by 2 quantitative indicators:

  • The number of paramedical caregivers mobilized for the reception and care of the pet.
  • The time spent by each member of staff on receiving and caring for the pet, in minutes.
Day 1
Patient microbiological impact
Time Frame: Day 1

Search for multi-resistant bacteria on rectal and nasal swabs taken from patients on a routine weekly basis (Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, ESBL-producing Enterobacteria, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteria).

Stool analysis, in particular for Clostridium Difficile and Salmonella, and bacterial and parasitic research by multiplex PCR.

Day 1
Intensive care unity microbiological impact
Time Frame: Day 1
Surface samples will be taken in conjunction with the operational hygiene team before and after the animal visit, in the room where the visit takes place, in the room of each patient included after discharge, and in the care areas of the intensive care unit. These samples will focus on bacteria, fungi and parasites.
Day 1
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
Satisfaction survey
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cindy POKRANDT, CHU Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21PH263
  • 2023-A01439-36 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intensive Care Patients

Clinical Trials on Pet visit

3
Subscribe