- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06133894
Effect of Exercise-education Program PERMANENTO in Late Life (PERMANENTO)
Effect of Exercise-education Program Inspired by Developmental Kinesiology on Determinants of Sarkopenia and Frailty in Late Life
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There is no doubt about the importance of a physical activity at a later age, yet it is often missing in the lives of seniors and the current epidemiological situation deepens this deficit even further. It is known that insufficient physical activity has a major effect on the decline of functional fitness components, premature development of sarcopenia or frailty syndrome, threatening self-sufficiency, health and consequently quality of life. This is associated with an increased burden on the health care system and related social services, with implications for public budgets. The aim of this project is to eliminate the onset or premature manifestation of negative aspects of aging by prevention. The content is to research a unique intervention inspired by the principles of developmental kinesiology with a presumed positive effect on the health status and the development of a comprehensive exercise and educational program for older adults. The main planned result of the project is a methodological manual and a web application containing education and exercise program for both older adults as well healthcare professionals.
The project responds to the priorities of the Applied Health Research Program for the years 2020-2026 and its focus contributes to a long-term solution of the population aging issue. With regard to demographic change, health and social care systems will be unsustainable without the adoption of preventive measures by seniors themselves. Exercise-educational intervention can lead to lasting changes and can help seniors to actively and responsibly participate in the course of their own aging. Main objective: to reduce negative health related aspects of aging, resp. their premature manifestation, by a preventive exercise-educational program. Sub-objectives: - to develop a specifically targeted exercise-educational program; - to demonstrate effectiveness of the program on health and social related indicators; - to assess acceptability, sustainability and other personal contexts - to create a methodological manual and a web platform for home-dwelling as well as institutionalized older adults containing complex information for independent exercise (how, as well as why).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Praha, Czechia, 182 00
- Centre of Expertise oi Longevity and Long-term Care
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- permanent residency in Prague
- being at least 70 years of age or older
- living independently at home
Exclusion Criteria:
- significant mobility limitation
- any health condition preventing from physical activity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group was educated and instructed and agaged in a 12-week exercise program - 15 minutes 6 times per week of complex daily routines delivered via on-line platform.
|
The intervention is based on activation of reflexive movement patterns which ensures the original reflexive control of strength, mobility and stability.
After birth, we cannot control our body movements - they are reflexes "hard-wired" into our brains and vitally important for proper development of our body (muscular system, vestibular system, sensory system, cardiovascular system or digestive system) as well as our brain and nervous systems.
During early childhood, everything becomes integrated and works perfectly according to the original design.
But this design is slowly abandoned due to for example sedentary lifestyle and replaced by compensatory movement patterns that are making us weaker and defective with all the consequences that are becoming more severe as we age.
The aim is restore the original design and improve posture and other crucial components of functional fitness and move better and more.
|
No Intervention: Contol group
The control group continued in regular daily activities and was offered the same intervention as the experimental group after the research trial.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Timed up-and go test
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Performance-based measure of functional mobility and balance in older adults.The test requires the participant to rise from a chair, walk 3.0 m at a comfortable pace to a mark placed on the floor, turn around at the 3.0 m mark, walk back to the starting point, and return to sitting in the chair.
The test's score is the time it takes the subject takes to complete the test.
Lower score is better result.
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Limits of stability on NeuroCom
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
The Limits of Stability (LOS) test quantifies the maximum distance participant can lean own body (i.e.
intentionally weight shift) in a given direction without losing balance, stepping, or reaching for assistance as would be required for function and gait.
The scores for each parameter and movement direction are represented by a numeric value.
Higher score is better result.
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
The Sensory Organization Test on NeuroCom
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) objectively identifies abnormalities in the patient's use of the three sensory systems that contribute to postural control: somatosensory, visual, and vestibular.
The scores summarize the overall function of the three systems and the ability to resolve conflicting sensory inputs.
Scores range from 0 to 100 (higher score, better result).
Composite score identifies the presence of a balance control problem.
Scores range from 0 to 100 (higher score, better result).
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Body composition on InBody 720
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
The multifrequency body composition analyser InBody720 analyses body composition via the method of bioelectrical impedance (DSM-BIA) for every part of the body using 6 different frequencies (1kHz, 5kHz, 50kHz, 250kHz, 500kHz, 1000kHz) in each one of the five parts of the body with the quadrupole 8-point tactile system.
It provides wide range of outcomes (main focus on: Body fat mass - lower score, better result, Skeletal muscle mass - higher score, better result, Visceral Fat - lower score, better result).
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Handgrip strength on dynanometr
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Handgrip strength test is to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles.
Participant is instructed to squeezes the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort, which is maintained for about 5 seconds.
No other body movement is allowed.
Higher score, better result.
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Perceived functional fitness and health status
Time Frame: Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Measured by questions "In general, would you say your health is poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent?"
and "In general, would you say your functional fitness is poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent?".
Score are represented on 5-point scale: (1) Excellent, 2) Very Good, 3) Good, 4) Fair, or 5) Poor).
Lower score, better result.
|
Within a week prior the intervention and within a week after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Long-term sustainability
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after the end of the intervention
|
To evaluate acceptance and long-term sustainability of the program via on-line questionnaire distributed among participants.
The questionnaire is rather qualitative and includes Yes vs.
No answers and open ended item.
|
6 and 12 months after the end of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katerina Machacova, Centre of Expertise in Longevity and Long-term care, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NU22-09-00447
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Frailty
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores...Not yet recruiting
-
Longeveron Inc.CompletedAging FrailtyUnited States
-
Longeveron Inc.CompletedAging FrailtyUnited States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted
-
Xijing HospitalUnknownFrailty SyndromeChina
-
Region ZealandUniversity of Southern DenmarkActive, not recruitingFrailty SyndromeDenmark
-
Neurological Associates of West Los AngelesEnrolling by invitation
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliCompleted
Clinical Trials on Exercise program PERMANENTO inspired by developmental kinesiology
-
Beni-Suef UniversityAzhar UniversityEnrolling by invitationPhysical Disability | Physical Therapy ModalitiesEgypt
-
Qassim UniversityCairo University; Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityCompletedTurf Toe | Metatarsophalangeal (Joint) SprainSaudi Arabia
-
Dalarna UniversitySormland County Council, Sweden; The Swedish Judo FederationCompletedFrailty | Fear of Falling | Fall Injury | Accidental Fall | Aging ProblemsSweden
-
Dalarna UniversitySormland County Council, SwedenCompletedFall Injury | Accidental Fall | Work-related Injury | Work AccidentSweden
-
Medipol UniversityCompleted
-
Università degli Studi di BresciaUniversity of KielCompletedParkinson Disease | Healthy AgingItaly
-
Stiftelsen Stockholms SjukhemKarolinska InstitutetRecruitingPhysical Activity | Parkinson Disease | Gait Disorders, Neurologic | eHealthSweden
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiMedical Park Hospital IstanbulCompletedChronic Pain | Neck PainTurkey
-
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Japan.; Facultad de...Active, not recruitingCognitive Decline | Vascular HealthMexico
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghai Simlab Health TechnologyRecruiting