Double-task Exercise in Older Adults at Risk of Cognitive Decline (MeMo-Health-Cog-3 Program)

October 7, 2023 updated by: Dr. Rosalinda Sanchez Arenas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Double-task Exercise Programs to Strengthen Cognitive and Vascular Health in Older Adults at Risk of Cognitive Decline: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Cerebral small vessel disease is a frequent cause of cognitive disability among older adults (OAs) in Mexico that imposes a significant burden on the health system and OAs' families. We have called the program Mind and Movement for Cognitive Health (MeMo-Salud-Cog-3). Programs to prevent or delay OAs' cognitive decline are scarce. Methods and analysis: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial will be conducted. The study will aim to evaluate two 24-week double-task (aerobic and cognitive) square-stepping exercise programs for OAs at risk of cognitive decline-one program with and another without caregiver participation-and to compare these with an aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program (control group). 255 OAs (85 per group) affiliated with the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) between 60 and 65 years of age with self-reported cognitive concerns will participate. They will be stratified by education level and randomly allocated to the groups. The intervention will last 24 weeks, and the effect of each program will be evaluated 12, 24, and 52 weeks after the intervention. Participants' demographic and clinical characteristics will be collected at baseline. The outcomes will include: (i) general cognitive function; (ii) specific cognitive functions; (iii) dual-task gait; (iv) blood pressure; (v) carotid intima-media thickness; (vi) carotid arterial compliance; (vii) OAs' health-related quality of life; and (viii) caregiver burden. We will estimate differences in outcomes between each intervention group and the control group at baseline and follow-up evaluations. We will assess differences-in-differences (D-in-D) treatment effects using a D-in-D estimator. If we identify statistically significant differences in participants' baseline characteristics between the groups, we will adjust the D-in-D estimators by these covariates using generalized linear regression models. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the IMSS Ethics and Research Committee (registration number 2018-785-095). All participants will sign a consent form prior to their participation. The study results will be disseminated to IMSS authorities, healthcare providers and the research community.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Aim: to evaluate two 24-week double-task (aerobic and cognitive) square-stepping exercise programs for older adults (OAs) at risk of cognitive decline - one program with and another without caregiver participation - and to compare these with an aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program (control group). 255 OAs (85 per group) affiliated with the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) between 60 and 75 years of age with self-reported cognitive concerns will participate. They will be stratified by education level and randomly allocated to the groups.
  2. Study design: A double-blind randomized clinical trial entitled "Mind and Movement: Towards the Cognitive Health of Older Adults" will be conducted. The study will include two intervention groups and one control group: (1) a double-task exercise program with a squared mat led by a coach (a health professional) for 24 weeks (T1-GR); (2) the same exercise program led by a coach (a health professional) for 12 weeks and then led by caregivers of older adults for another 12 weeks (T2-GR); and (3) a control group of an aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program led by a coach for 24 weeks (C-GR).
  3. Study hypothesis:

    The investigators hypothesize that T1 and T2 double-task exercise trainings will show more significant improvements in older adults than the control aerobic training with regards to (i) general cognitive function; (ii) specific cognitive functions (executive function, processing speed, verbal learning and memory, and verbal fluency); (iii) usual walking and dual-task gait; (iv) blood pressure; (v) carotid intima-media thickness; (vi) carotid arterial compliance; (vii) older adults' health-related quality of life; and (viii) caregiver burden.

  4. Sample Size: It was calculated using the formula suggested by Zong (2009)32 for continuous outcome variable and non-inferiority design (2 [Z 1-α+Z 1-β/ δ] * S2). The investigators considered α <0.05, a power of 80%, and the assumptions to δ0 (a clinically acceptable margin) and S2(polled standard deviations of both comparison groups): General cognitive function=0.20(0.05), Mental flexibility (EF) part A=0.13(0.03) and B=0.37(0.37), Processing speed=0.06(0.02), Verbal learning=0.63(0.32) and memory=0.16(0.08), Verbal fluency words by category= 0.54 (0.14) and by letter=0.66 (0.17), Walking speed (cm/s)=0.23(0.06), Walking length(cm)=0.86(0.22), Systolic blood pressure(mmHg)=0.27(0.06); Diastolic blood pressure(mmHg)=0.79(0.40), Carotid intima-media thickness(mm)=0.20(0.05).Subjective burden on informal caregivers=0.53, Patient health-related quality of life (SF-36) Mental score=4.0(1.0) and Physical score=4.0(2.0). The maximum required sample size, assuming a possible 20% drop-out rate, is 85 participants per group.
  5. Intervention implementation:

    The study will be conducted at IMSS Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit facilities in Mexico City.

    The T1-GR will consist of 60-minute training sessions delivered three days a week during a 24-week period. Each session will be guided by a health professional with a nursing background previously certified to coach SSE trainings by the Institute of Square-Stepping Exercise in Mie, Japan (Chief Tomohiro Okura and Overseas Director Professor Ryosuke Shigematsu).

    In the case of T2-GR, older adults and their caregivers will participate in the same SSE program led by a coach for 12 weeks; older adults will then be asked to continue SSE at home under the supervision and with the active participation of their caregivers for another 12 weeks. They will be asked to practice SSE for 60 minutes, three times a week, and to reach a ≥65% heart rate increase. In the field of sports, the people who perform the above-mentioned activities are called "pacers," and they supervise physical activity through active accompaniment of older adults.

  6. Compliance and adverse events monitoring A monitoring system will be developed to perform long-distance monitoring of compliance with physical activity. It will include three components: i) the system that will collect the information from a chipset connected to the SSE mats (e.g., time of exercise, velocity); ii) the system that will transmit and store the data on the study computer; iii) the system for supervision and follow-up, which will allow connecting with participants through different electronic devices, such as mobile phones and e-mails.

    The monitoring system will be an important strategy to avoid missing data, drop-out rates and low program adherence.

    In addition, the investigators will monitor study adverse events through direct observations of the study participants during the exercise sessions, monitoring system, and 12-, 24-, and 54-week evaluations.

    The investigators will register number, type (e.g., dizziness, pain, fatigue, muscle strains, falls, or injuries), and severity of adverse events during the exercise sessions and outside the hours of the exercise sessions but during the intervention period. The severity of events will be categorized as follows: mild (do not affect activities of daily living); moderate (have moderate effect on activities of daily living); and severe (requires hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability or results in some life-threatening, or other medically important condition). RSA and ABD will review all adverse events on a weekly basis. They will report all moderate and severe adverse events to the IMSS Ethics Committee and stop the study if the adverse events data demonstrate any hazard of the intervention.

  7. Motivation strategies The monitoring system will be an important strategy to avoid drop-outs and low program adherence. It will be complemented by motivation phone calls to those participants who fail to attend the group sessions or to perform home-based SES activities.

    Moreover, the study will include 10-15 minute group discussions to explore health-related topics, such as the benefits of healthy lifestyles (e.g., physical activity, nutrition) to maintaining cardiovascular and brain health or to exchange experiences on past events. The discussions will precede exercise training sessions.

  8. Evaluations The investigators will conduct four evaluations during the study: the baseline evaluation and 12-week, 24-week, and 52-week evaluations. The study outcome variables will be measured at each evaluation, while the covariates will be collected only at the beginning of the study. The investigators will also measure the participants' adherence to the programs, defined as 80% or higher compliance with the assigned exercise training regimen. Finally, the investigators will document the reasons for dropouts and poor adherence. Previously trained health professionals with a medical specialty in geriatrics will perform these evaluations.

    The study covariates will cover Participant demographic and clinical characteristics: age (years from birth); biological sex (male or female); formal educational attainment (years); current employment status (retired, employed, volunteer, unpaid worker, unemployed); marital status (married, widowed, divorced, single, other); and current living situation (living alone, living with a spouse, living with or without children); self-reported comorbidities relevant to this study (e.g., vascular risk factors, orthopedic conditions, etc.); and self-reported baseline physical activity defined as i) ideal (≥150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity activity or ≥75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity activity, or an equivalent combination); ii) moderate/intermediate (≤149 minutes per week of moderate-intensity activity or ≤74 minutes per week of vigorous or intense activity, or an equivalent combination); and iii) poor (without any moderate or intense physical activity). The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele is a genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's.

    Caregivers will be asked the following: age, biological sex, formal educational attainment, current employment status, marital status, relation to the patient, and self-reported baseline physical activity, as previously defined; availability of social support networks; and presence of animal companions at home. Social support will be measured using the Household and Family Support Networks subsection (part 5) of the World Health Organization Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health.

  9. Data Management and confidentiality Data entry will be conducted by trained staff. Data quality will be assessed before statistical analysis (eg, range checks for data values).

    Only members of the study team will have access to the study information and all information that will be collected from participants will be kept private to ensure confidentiality. The consent forms with participant signatures will be stored in a locked location only accessible by the principal investigator (PI). All electronic data will be stored on the PI laptop and a back-up hard drive which will be password protected. Any handwritten information such as field notes or other related research materials will be stored and secured in a locked cabinet when not in use. Data will be erased and destroyed after 5 years, as per IMSS Ethics and Research Committee guidelines. Only deidentified data will be used for reporting, publication, and dissemination of findings.

  10. Statistical Analysis First, the investigators will perform a descriptive analysis of the older adults' and caregivers' characteristics at each evaluation and evaluate the distribution of quantitative variables using the Kilmogorov-Smirnov normality test. Variables that have normal distribution will be analyzed using means and standard deviations, variables with non-normal distribution will be presented using medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and categorical variables will be analyzed by using frequencies and percentages. Second, for each evaluation the investigators will compare study variables between T1-GR and C-GR and between T2-GR and C-GR. The comparison between these groups will be performed using Student's t-test (for normally distributed continuous variables), Mann Whitney-U test (for continuous variables that are not normally distributed), or Chi-square test (for categorical variables), as appropriate. The difference between baseline and post-intervention evaluations for each group will be measured using the Student's paired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test when the distribution is non-normal. The effect of the intervention on the outcome variables will be assessed by estimating the differences-in-differences (D-in-D) treatment effects using a D-in-D estimator.46 If the investigators identify statistically significant differences in participants' baseline characteristics and adherence to the exercise regimens among the studied groups, the model will adjust the results of the D-in-D treatment effects by these covariates using a generalized linear regression model (GLM), where Yi= ß0+ ß1Xi+ß2X+ ß3X +ßjCov +ei; in this regression equation, ß1 represents the mean difference within each group, β2 the mean change after the intervention, β3 the difference in mean change between the two groups (e.g., T1-GR and C-GR), ßjCov the covariates that were different between the study groups, and ei= the standard error. This model considers the correlation among repeated observations of the same subject and allows a more precise estimate to be obtained. The investigators will conduct a model for each outcome variables. P-values < 0.05 will be interpreted as statistically significant. The analyses will be performed using the software Stata 14.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06720
        • Rosalinda Sánchez Arenas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria.

  1. With 60-75 years of age.
  2. They have self-reported cognitive concerns (ie, have answered "yes" to the question: "Do you feel like your memory or thinking skills have gotten worse recently?").
  3. They demonstrate functional independence in activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living.
  4. They have one or more vascular risk factors (eg, type 2 diabetes or hypertension).
  5. They have symptoms or signs of underlying cognitive dysfunction without a diagnosis of dementia (ie, confirmed by a review of their health records and a Mini Mental State Exam [MMSE] score> 24).
  6. They have an informal caregiver who accepts to participate.

Exclusion criteria.

  1. With depression (score> 15 according to the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised [CESD-R]).
  2. With clinically significant neurological or psychiatric disorders (eg, Parkinson's, schizophrenia).
  3. With a recent severe cardiovascular event (eg, myocardial infarction, stroke).
  4. With a major orthopedic condition (eg, severe osteoarthritis).
  5. With blood pressure that is unsafe for exercise (ie,> 180/100 mmHg or <100/60 mmHg).
  6. With a severe visual or auditory impairment.
  7. With an unwillingness to adhere to the intervention schedules.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group (C-GR)
Control group of an aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program led by a coach for 24 weeks (C-GR).
The T1-GR will consist of 60-minute training sessions delivered three days a week during a 24-week period. Each session will be guided by a health profesional certified to coach SSE. The make-up of each session is: 1) 5 minutes of warm-up; 2) 30 minutes of moderate-to-strong intensity aerobic exercise, 3) 5 minutes of aerobic cool-down, 4) 20 minutes of double-task exercise (mat); and 5) 5 minutes of cool-down stretching (this times does not count as activity).
Other Names:
  • Double-task exercise by a health professional
In the case of T2-GR, older adults and their caregivers will participate in the same SSE program led by a coach for 12 weeks; older adults will then be asked to continue SSE at home under the supervision and with the active participation of their caregivers for another 12 weeks. They will be asked to practice SSE for 60 minutes, three times a week, and to reach a ≥65% heart rate increase. In the field of sports, the people who perform the above-mentioned activities are called "pacers," and they supervise physical activity through active accompaniment of older adults.
Experimental: T1-GR training sessions by health professional
The T1-GR will consist of 60-minute training sessions delivered three days a week during a 24-week period. Each session will be guided by a health professional with a nursing background previously certified to coach SSE trainings by the Institute of Square-Stepping Exercise in Mie, Japan (Chief Tomohiro Okura and Overseas Director Professor Ryosuke Shigematsu).
Each session will be for 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 24 weeks. The make-up of each session is 1) 5 minutes of warm-up; 2) 30 minutes of moderate-to-strong intensity aerobic exercise, 3) 5 minutes of aerobic cool-down, 4) 20 minutes of balance-stretching exercise; and 5) 5 minutes of cool-down stretching (this times does not count as activity).
Other Names:
  • Aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program
Experimental: T2-GR older adults and their caregivers
In the case of T2-GR, older adults and their caregivers will participate in the same SSE program led by a coach for 12 weeks; older adults will then be asked to continue SSE at home under the supervision and with the active participation of their caregivers for another 12 weeks. They will be asked to practice SSE for 60 minutes, three times a week, and to reach a ≥65% heart rate increase. In the field of sports, the people who perform the above-mentioned activities are called "pacers," and they supervise physical activity through active accompaniment of older adults.
Each session will be for 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 24 weeks. The make-up of each session is 1) 5 minutes of warm-up; 2) 30 minutes of moderate-to-strong intensity aerobic exercise, 3) 5 minutes of aerobic cool-down, 4) 20 minutes of balance-stretching exercise; and 5) 5 minutes of cool-down stretching (this times does not count as activity).
Other Names:
  • Aerobic-balance-stretching exercise program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Cognitive funtion
Time Frame: 12 weeks
General cognitive function assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test on a scale of 0-30 points. Scores are interpreted as follows: >26 indicates no dementia, 18-26 mild cognitive impairment, 6-10 moderate dementia, and <6 severe dementia.
12 weeks
General Cognitive funtion
Time Frame: 24 weeks
General cognitive function assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test on a scale of 0-30 points. Scores are interpreted as follows: >26 indicates no dementia, 18-26 mild cognitive impairment, 6-10 moderate dementia, and <6 severe dementia.
24 weeks
General Cognitive funtion
Time Frame: 52 weeks
General cognitive function assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test on a scale of 0-30 points. Scores are interpreted as follows: >26 indicates no dementia, 18-26 mild cognitive impairment, 6-10 moderate dementia, and <6 severe dementia.
52 weeks
Specific domains of cognitive function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Measured through composite scores: Executive function/mental flexibility will be measured with the Trail Making Tests, Part A and Part B. The results for both TMT-A and TMT-B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete a task. Processing speed (using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) will be measured as the total correct number-symbol matches achieved in 90 seconds. Verbal learning and memory will be assessed through Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) that consists of documenting the number of words remembered from a list of 15 words presented in two separate moments; this test allows evaluation of the RAVLT-Immediate and RAVLT-Percent Forgetting. Verbal fluency (semantic, animal naming, and phonemic) will be measured by using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and assessed through the total number of words identified by category and letter.
12 weeks
Specific domains of cognitive function
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured through composite scores: Executive function/mental flexibility will be measured with the Trail Making Tests, Part A and Part B. The results for both TMT-A and TMT-B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete a task. Processing speed (using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) will be measured as the total correct number-symbol matches achieved in 90 seconds. Verbal learning and memory will be assessed through Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) that consists of documenting the number of words remembered from a list of 15 words presented in two separate moments; this test allows evaluation of the RAVLT-Immediate and RAVLT-Percent Forgetting. Verbal fluency (semantic, animal naming, and phonemic) will be measured by using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and assessed through the total number of words identified by category and letter.
24 weeks
Specific domains of cognitive function
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Measured through composite scores: Executive function/mental flexibility will be measured with the Trail Making Tests, Part A and Part B. The results for both TMT-A and TMT-B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete a task. Processing speed (using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test) will be measured as the total correct number-symbol matches achieved in 90 seconds. Verbal learning and memory will be assessed through Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) that consists of documenting the number of words remembered from a list of 15 words presented in two separate moments; this test allows evaluation of the RAVLT-Immediate and RAVLT-Percent Forgetting. Verbal fluency (semantic, animal naming, and phonemic) will be measured by using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and assessed through the total number of words identified by category and letter.
52 weeks
Cognitive reserve
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Capacity that enables an individual to cope with and/or recover from the impact of a neural injury or a psychotic episode.
24 weeks
Cognitive reserve
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Capacity that enables an individual to cope with and/or recover from the impact of a neural injury or a psychotic episode.
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usual walking and dual-task gait
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Usual walking and dual-task gait will be evaluated through motion capture during the six-minute walk test (6MWT), which requires participants to walk back and forth across a 30-metre area at a comfortable pace for six minutes. The fixed distance utilized by 6MWT allows determination of gait speed (i.e., v=d/t); however, this test will also be coupled with infrared stride analysis, which will allow for a more precise evaluation of gait speed, stride length, and stride variability under usual and dual-task conditions. These procedures will provide a number of valid and reliable gait outcomes through the synchronization of mobility data via eight infrared cameras, six force plates, and electromyography.
12 weeks
Usual walking and dual-task gait
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Usual walking and dual-task gait will be evaluated through motion capture during the six-minute walk test (6MWT), which requires participants to walk back and forth across a 30-metre area at a comfortable pace for six minutes. The fixed distance utilized by 6MWT allows determination of gait speed (i.e., v=d/t); however, this test will also be coupled with infrared stride analysis, which will allow for a more precise evaluation of gait speed, stride length, and stride variability under usual and dual-task conditions. These procedures will provide a number of valid and reliable gait outcomes through the synchronization of mobility data via eight infrared cameras, six force plates, and electromyography.
24 weeks
Usual walking and dual-task gait
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Usual walking and dual-task gait will be evaluated through motion capture during the six-minute walk test (6MWT), which requires participants to walk back and forth across a 30-metre area at a comfortable pace for six minutes. The fixed distance utilized by 6MWT allows determination of gait speed (i.e., v=d/t); however, this test will also be coupled with infrared stride analysis, which will allow for a more precise evaluation of gait speed, stride length, and stride variability under usual and dual-task conditions. These procedures will provide a number of valid and reliable gait outcomes through the synchronization of mobility data via eight infrared cameras, six force plates, and electromyography.
52 weeks
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Blood pressure (BP) will be measured as part of the monitoring system. Participants will be provided with an appropriately-sized ambulatory BP monitoring device. BP will be recorded over a 24-hour period: twice in the same hour during daytime hours (i.e., 06:00am-22:00pm) and once during nighttime hours (i.e., 22:00pm-06:00am). Systolic and diastolic BP values will be averaged over the entire 24-hour period and used for analysis. A minimum of 28 successful BP readings out of 40 in total (70%) will be required for statistical analysis. In order to account for external influences on BP, participants will be provided with an activity log and instructed to report the time and type of any stressful or physically demanding situations they experience while wearing the ambulatory BP monitor.
12 weeks
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Blood pressure (BP) will be measured as part of the monitoring system. Participants will be provided with an appropriately-sized ambulatory BP monitoring device. BP will be recorded over a 24-hour period: twice in the same hour during daytime hours (i.e., 06:00am-22:00pm) and once during nighttime hours (i.e., 22:00pm-06:00am). Systolic and diastolic BP values will be averaged over the entire 24-hour period and used for analysis. A minimum of 28 successful BP readings out of 40 in total (70%) will be required for statistical analysis. In order to account for external influences on BP, participants will be provided with an activity log and instructed to report the time and type of any stressful or physically demanding situations they experience while wearing the ambulatory BP monitor.
24 weeks
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Blood pressure (BP) will be measured as part of the monitoring system. Participants will be provided with an appropriately-sized ambulatory BP monitoring device. BP will be recorded over a 24-hour period: twice in the same hour during daytime hours (i.e., 06:00am-22:00pm) and once during nighttime hours (i.e., 22:00pm-06:00am). Systolic and diastolic BP values will be averaged over the entire 24-hour period and used for analysis. A minimum of 28 successful BP readings out of 40 in total (70%) will be required for statistical analysis. In order to account for external influences on BP, participants will be provided with an activity log and instructed to report the time and type of any stressful or physically demanding situations they experience while wearing the ambulatory BP monitor.
52 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is the thickness of the two innermost layers of the arterial wall, intima and median in cm and will be measured through an ultrasound of the right common carotid artery. Specifically, a longitudinal B-mode image (Philips HDI 5000 ultrasound, 7-12 MHz linear array transducer) of the cephalic portion of the right common carotid artery will be obtained by a trained ultrasound technician. The composite IMT was calculated as the means of near and far wall IMT of all carotid segments, millimeters.
12 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is the thickness of the two innermost layers of the arterial wall, intima and median in cm and will be measured through an ultrasound of the right common carotid artery. Specifically, a longitudinal B-mode image (Philips HDI 5000 ultrasound, 7-12 MHz linear array transducer) of the cephalic portion of the right common carotid artery will be obtained by a trained ultrasound technician. The composite IMT was calculated as the means of near and far wall IMT of all carotid segments, millimeters.
24 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is the thickness of the two innermost layers of the arterial wall, intima and median in cm and will be measured through an ultrasound of the right common carotid artery. Specifically, a longitudinal B-mode image (Philips HDI 5000 ultrasound, 7-12 MHz linear array transducer) of the cephalic portion of the right common carotid artery will be obtained by a trained ultrasound technician. The composite IMT was calculated as the means of near and far wall IMT of all carotid segments, millimeters.
52 weeks
Quality of life as measured by SF-12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Older adults' health-related quality of life (QoL) will be measured by the short form (SF-12) of the Medical Outcomes Survey questionnaire, comprised of 12 items. Physical and mental scores will be calculated using an algorithm to convert each item response into standardized values according to specific predetermined weights. Summary scores for each component range from 0-100 and are interpreted as low QoL (close to 0) and high QoL (approaching 100).
12 weeks
Quality of life as measured by SF-12
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Older adults' health-related quality of life (QoL) will be measured by the short form (SF-12) of the Medical Outcomes Survey questionnaire, comprised of 12 items. Physical and mental scores will be calculated using an algorithm to convert each item response into standardized values according to specific predetermined weights. Summary scores for each component range from 0-100 and are interpreted as low QoL (close to 0) and high QoL (approaching 100).
24 weeks
Quality of life as measured by SF-12
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Older adults' health-related quality of life (QoL) will be measured by the short form (SF-12) of the Medical Outcomes Survey questionnaire, comprised of 12 items. Physical and mental scores will be calculated using an algorithm to convert each item response into standardized values according to specific predetermined weights. Summary scores for each component range from 0-100 and are interpreted as low QoL (close to 0) and high QoL (approaching 100).
52 weeks
Subjective Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective burden on informal caregivers will be measured using the short form of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-s)-a 10-item instrument. Each item is measured on a four-point scale with the values "strongly disagree" (0), "disagree" (1), "agree" (2), and "strongly agree" (3). A high degree of agreement indicates higher perception of burden by the caregiver.
24 weeks
Subjective Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Subjective burden on informal caregivers will be measured using the short form of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-s)-a 10-item instrument. Each item is measured on a four-point scale with the values "strongly disagree" (0), "disagree" (1), "agree" (2), and "strongly agree" (3). A high degree of agreement indicates higher perception of burden by the caregiver.
52 weeks
Subjective Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Subjective burden on informal caregivers will be measured using the short form of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-s)-a 10-item instrument. Each item is measured on a four-point scale with the values "strongly disagree" (0), "disagree" (1), "agree" (2), and "strongly agree" (3). A high degree of agreement indicates higher perception of burden by the caregiver.
12 weeks
Cardiovascular biomarkers and endothelial function: MCP-1, ICAM VCAM and Selectin
Time Frame: 24 weeks
This is the ability of circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (E-selectin), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) to serve as molecular markers of atherosclerosis and predictors of incident cardiovascular disease.
24 weeks
Cardiovascular biomarkers and endothelial function: MCP-1, ICAM VCAM and Selectin
Time Frame: 52 weeks
This is the ability of circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (E-selectin), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) to serve as molecular markers of atherosclerosis and predictors of incident cardiovascular disease.
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rosalinda Sánchez Arenas, PhD, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Socil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-785-095
  • 2023-3-146 (Other Grant/Funding Number: INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on "Mind and Movement for Cognitive Health in the Older Adult"

3
Subscribe