Factors Determining Time Allocation of a MCQ Examination

January 8, 2024 updated by: CHATCHAI, Suranaree University of Technology

Factors Determining Time Allocation of a Multiple-Choice Question Examination: The Students' Perspective

The MCQ is one of the objective assessment methods. It is proper to evaluate the cognitive domain of learners with high objectivity. However, there are no definite criteria for determining the appropriate exam time. The ability to comprehend the meaning of a text, when reading, cannot be directly applied to reading for decision-making or answering questions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was conducted at the Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology in Thailand. The research participants were second to fifth-year medical students who had taken MCQ tests during their preclinical and clinical years between the academic years 2021-2022. All examinations in this study were computer-based, closed book, single best answer MCQs written in English. The participants were Thai, non-native English speakers A questionnaire was chosen as the data collection method due to the ease of administering it to new fourth-year medical students with minimal disruption to their learning activities. Convenience sampling was used to randomly select second to fifth-year medical students as the students would not be identifiable. An online survey or questionnaire-based study was used to collect information from participants in this study. If the data was unsaturated, triangulation data from a group of interviews would consist of students from different rotations to receive as much information on students' perspectives as possible

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

298

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, 30000
        • Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The research participants were both preclinical and clinical years of medical students between the academic years 2021-2022. In the preclinical years, the study included three organ systems (hematology, urinary, and gastrointestinal system). Meanwhile, six clinical learning subjects from two major departments, which were Medicine and Surgery, were included. The medical students from another academic year who were re-sitting for the examination in 2021-2022 were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students (2nd- 5th years) at Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factors Determining Time Allocation of a Multiple-Choice Question Examination: The Students' Perspective
Time Frame: June 2021-SEP 2022
The authors were interested in exploring the aspects of the medical students' perspective about the factors affecting their discission on MCQs answering
June 2021-SEP 2022

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Equation for Medical Multiple-Choice Question Testing Time Estimation
Time Frame: June 2021-SEP 2022
The authors generated a specific computer program that integrated with the operating system of the examination. Technical specific features included the ability to calculate the speed of students taking MCQ exams with images or videos in the questions or options.
June 2021-SEP 2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chatchai Kreepala, M.D., Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EC-64-102

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

the students' IDs were blind from origianal data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Questionaires

3
Subscribe