Wellness & Workforce Solution for Lupus/Lupus Nephritis

January 10, 2024 updated by: Morehouse School of Medicine

[2069264-1] Wellness & Workforce Solution for Lupus and Lupus Nephritis / Janssen Clinical Investigator Initiated Study

The investigators will test the hypothesis that culturally congruent coaching delivered via a technology application (Health360x) will improve the persistent disparities observed among women of color with lupus or lupus nephritis by addressing underlying psychosocial barriers to behavioral change.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators' proposed intervention combines technology with culturally congruent coaching (C3) to increase access and engagement of women of color with lupus through remote instruction. The investigators will test the hypothesis that culturally congruent coaching delivered via a technology application (Health360x) will improve the persistent disparities observed among women of color with lupus or lupus nephritis by addressing underlying psychosocial barriers to behavioral change. The investigators will attain this by connecting patients to extensively trained coaches who have lived experiences that clinicians and providers often lack. These shared social and cultural experiences breeds trust and allows for more open communication that the coach can use to provide more appropriate guidance. Leveraging technology, the investigators' program is asynchronous, promotes engagement and retention of information through micro-learning, and allows the investigators to better understand patient experiences beyond structured surveys by capturing what is happening in the patient-coach relationship.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jan Morgan-Billingslea
  • Phone Number: (404) 756-5713
  • Email: jmorgan@msm.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Dana Kajan, DO
  • Phone Number: (404) 752-1166
  • Email: dkajan@msm.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. females ; Age over 18yo
  4. Self-reported diagnosis of Lupus or Lupus Nephritis, or documented diagnosis of Lupus or Lupus Nephritis
  5. Willingness to adhere to the study intervention regimen
  6. Access to necessary resources for participating in a technology-based intervention (i.e., computer, smart-phone, internet access)
  7. Not currently practicing self-management behaviors and have not participated in a class or program on self-management behavior within the last 12 months

Adult women with lupus and lupus nephritis will be enrolled in the study. Eligibility: Adult women with lupus and lupus nephritis who are able to consent and participate in self-management support training. Access to the internet is required for this intervention. Ability to read English is required because all the materials are currently in English.

Coaches must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for duration of study
  3. Women of color with lupus or lupus nephritis with desire to help others
  4. Ability to communicate in English
  5. Secure access to Internet
  6. Private space for conducting participant visits
  7. Ability to use internet-based platform

Exclusion Criteria:

-Potential participants and coaches who are unable to speak or read English, access the internet, or complete data collection activities will be ineligible for participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: C3 Coach plus H360x
Arm 1 will have 80 participants who will receive four weekly goal setting sessions with coach consisting of 45 min-1 hour recorded sessions. They will then receive another 4 sessions every 2 weeks, followed by three monthly goal setting sessions. Baseline surveys will be collected, in addition to surveys taken at 3 and 6 months.
The coach and participant will use problem-solving tools embedded in Health360x to map out potential barriers to goal attainment and create goal action plans. This application has the potential to help improve health-related quality of life, and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with Lupus. The intervention also tests the role of health coaches in the lupus ecosystem. The potential economic gain and impact on more extant social determinants of health can create long ranging benefits on the health and wellbeing of the community.
The coaching process includes specified visits over the course of our proposed 6-month intervention. These visits will occur remotely using HIPAA compliant video conferencing tools or in person when it is safe and convenient to meet in person. Overall, the coaches will work with Lupus patients to facilitate experiential learning, improve functioning and performance in the context of working towards specific goals.
Active Comparator: C3 Coach plus Health360x and micro-learning
Arm 2 will have 80 participants who will receive four weekly goal setting sessions with coach consisting of 45 min-1 hour recorded sessions, in addition to periodic micro-learning content delivered via an online technology platform. They will then receive another 4 sessions every 2 weeks, followed by three monthly goal setting sessions. Baseline surveys will be collected, in addition to surveys taken at 3 and 6 months. This arm will have learning augmented by micro-learning to test effectiveness in enhancing engagement and promoting retention of educational content.
The coach and participant will use problem-solving tools embedded in Health360x to map out potential barriers to goal attainment and create goal action plans. This application has the potential to help improve health-related quality of life, and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with Lupus. The intervention also tests the role of health coaches in the lupus ecosystem. The potential economic gain and impact on more extant social determinants of health can create long ranging benefits on the health and wellbeing of the community.
The coaching process includes specified visits over the course of our proposed 6-month intervention. These visits will occur remotely using HIPAA compliant video conferencing tools or in person when it is safe and convenient to meet in person. Overall, the coaches will work with Lupus patients to facilitate experiential learning, improve functioning and performance in the context of working towards specific goals.
This is a series of modules designed to provide disease education, additional communication through 'push notifications,' promote self-management, and medication adherence in women of color with lupus and lupus nephritis. Leveraging technology, this program is asynchronous, promotes engagement and retention of information through micro-learning, and allows the investigators to better understand patient experiences beyond structured surveys by capturing what is happening in the patient-coach relationship.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
engagement
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
frequency counts of app usage and patterns of usage will be combined to report application usage data
Baseline, 3, 6 months
goal attainment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Health360x application usage data
Baseline, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Wireless or Universal Serial Bus enabled patient data upload
Baseline, 3, 6 months
change in diet
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
manual entry
Baseline, 6 months
change in blood glucose (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Wireless or Universal Serial Bus enabled patient uploads
Baseline, 3, 6 months
change in total distance walked daily
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Wireless or Universal Serial Bus enabled patient uploads
Baseline, 3, 6 months
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Health related quality of life measure in adult lupus 34 items across 8 domains (physical health, emotional health, body image, pain, planning, fatigue, intimate relationships, and burden to others); A mean raw score is transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst health related quality of life) to 100 (best health related quality of life)
Baseline, 3, 6 months
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Functional assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue); 13-item patient-reported outcome instrument (PRO) that was designed to assess fatigue-related symptoms and impacts on daily functioning; Item scores can range from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), and the total score from 0 to 52; lower scores indicate greater fatigue
Baseline, 3, 6 months
Stress Management
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Perceived Stress Scale-4; Individual scores on the Perceived Stress Scale can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
Baseline, 3, 6 months
Pain will be measured by Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF); Patients are asked to rate their current symptoms, their average experiences of pain, and the minimum and maximum intensities of their symptoms on scales that range from 0 to 10. A total pain severity score can be found by averaging these items or a single item can be treated as the primary outcome measure. A score relating to impact on daily life can be calculated by averaging scores on each of the seven items, which also use scales from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater severity and more interference.
Baseline, 3, 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Short Form 36 version 2(SF-36v2); scored from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health)
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
general practitioner scale (GPS) to reflect specific health activities and content of Health360x Lupus. GPS response categories use a 5-point Likert scale anchored by 1 (strongly agree) and 5 (strongly disagree)
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire 9; Total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent points for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Health self-efficacy scale; A total score, on a scale of 10 to 40, or a mean scale score, on a scale of 1 to 4, can be calculated. Higher scores indicate higher perceived general self-efficacy, lower scores indicate lower perceived general self-efficacy.
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire 4; Scores are rated as normal (0-2), mild (3-5), moderate (6-8), and severe (9-12). Total score ≥3 for first 2 questions suggests anxiety. Total score ≥3 for last 2 questions suggests depression.
Baseline, 3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Priscilla Pemu, MD, MSM Director of Clinical Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lupus Nephritis

Clinical Trials on Health360x app

Subscribe