A Comparative Analysis of Speech Perception Between Cochlear Implant Patients and DFNB9 Patients Receiving Gene Therapy

August 27, 2025 updated by: Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
This cohort study aims to explore the trends and differences in multidimensional perceptual levels of patients after cochlear implants or gene therapy, as well as to comprehensively assess the efficacy of gene therapy for congenital deafness, thus providing a reference for making a well-rounded postoperative rehabilitation protocol for gene therapy patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Cochlear implant patients exhibit improved speech perception in quiet environments after surgery, but their music perception and speech perception under noise are still unsatisfactory. Gene therapy is a novel and promising treatment for congenital hearing loss to recover natural hearing sensations. To date, for patients with congenital deafness, there has been no study on their ability to perceive and understand sounds, such as speech perception in noise, music and directional perception, after hearing recovery owing to gene therapy. In addition, the difference between the two treatments in those perceptual levels postoperatively remains unknown.

Therefore, the investigators designed a single-center cohort study. Based on the intervention method, congenital deafness patients are divided into two groups: the cochlear implant group and the gene therapy group. In the present study, a full-scale evaluation of the two groups will be conducted. The battery encompasses auditory speech perception, cognition, psychological status, and auditory cortex development. A comparative analysis will be conducted to examine multidimensional differences between the two groups, shedding light on the divergent outcomes of gene therapy and cochlear implants for patients with congenital deafness.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100730
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410011
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Second Xiangya Hospital Of Central South University
        • Contact:
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330006
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
        • Contact:
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200031
        • Recruiting
        • Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
        • Contact:
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Not yet recruiting
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The number of enrollments in the gene therapy group is expected to be 90, and that of the cochlear implant group is expected to be at least 90, according to the pairing ratio of at least 1:1 between the cochlear implant group and gene therapy group. An estimated 30 healthy subjects are expected to be recruited (optional, subject to recruitment feasibility) for electroencephalography and/or functional near-infrared spectroscopy assessments.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with congenital hearing loss with hearing thresholds ≥65 dB receive either gene therapy (previously received gene therapy and standardized postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up or plan to receive gene therapy), or cochlear implant surgery. Healthy participants with bilateral hearing thresholds within the normal range (≤20 dB), generally matched to the gene therapy group and the cochlear implant group by age and sex.
  • Age ≥ 6 months old, regardless of gender.
  • Mandarin Chinese as the native language.
  • Participants and their guardians must provide informed consent before the trial, voluntarily sign a written consent form, and commit to follow-up at specified time points.
  • Capable of effective communication with researchers under the guardian's assistance and willing to cooperate and comply with the researchers' requirements.
  • The participant's guardians should have a correct understanding of the trial and appropriate expectations regarding potential benefits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other otological disorders that may interfere with the surgical outcome or interpretation of study endpoints, such as middle/inner ear dysplasia or malformations that affected the therapeutic effect revealed in CT/MRI scans within 3 months, vestibular-cochlear nerve abnormalities, acute/chronic otitis media, Meniere's disease, etc.
  • Presence of other severe congenital diseases.
  • Presence of severe systemic diseases or in the acute onset of diseases, such as pulmonary tuberculosis, active hepatitis B or C infection, active herpes zoster infection, pancreatitis, renal insufficiency, etc.
  • Individuals with low immunity, a history of immune deficiency or organ transplantation.
  • Individuals with a history of neurological or mental disorders, such as epilepsy or dementia.
  • Patients with contraindications for surgery or anesthesia assessed by a surgeon, anesthetist, or designated personnel, such as cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in the past 6 months, allergies to the planned medications, etc.
  • Gene therapy group: gene therapy did not restore hearing; Cochlear implant group: presence of hereditary syndromic deafness or other conditions that seriously affect the efficacy evaluation.
  • Any other conditions for which the investigators consider the subject unsuitable for participation in this clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Gene Therapy Group
The study will recruit gene therapy patients who are definitely diagnosed with autosomal recessive deafness 9 (DFNB9).
Cochlear Implant Group
The study will recruit cochlear implant patients with congenital deafness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS)/Infant-toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS): the MAIS (≥3 years old)/IT-MAIS (0~3 years old) is an auditory perception test with a total score of 40 points. The higher the score the better the hearing ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP): the CAP is an auditory perception test with a total levels of 8. The higher the level the better the hearing ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR): the SIR is a speech perception test with a total levels of 5. The higher the level the better the hearing ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS): the MUSS is a speech perception test with a total score of 50 points. The higher the score the better the hearing ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Speech, Spatial, and Other Qualities of Hearing Scale for Parents (SSQ-P): the SSQ-P is an auditory speech and sound location perception test with a total score of 10 points. The higher the score the better the auditory speech and sound location ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Mandarin Speech Perception (MSP): the MSP is a speech test software included the perception tests of monosyllable, disyllable and sentence recognition in quiet and noise environment. The higher the score the better the auditory speech ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory speech perception
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
The Angel Test: the Angel Test is a speech test software included the perception tests of environmental sound test, final recognition test, initial recognition test and lexical tone test in quiet environment. The higher the score the better the auditory speech ability.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Griffiths development scales(GDS)/Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4e (WISC-IV): the GDS (0~6 years old)/WISC-IV (7~16 years old) is a cognitive function test. The higher the score the better the cognitive function.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory cortex development
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Electroencephalogram (EEG): the EEG is a non-invasive brain imaging method that uses brain maps to assess changes in auditory and speech-related cortex.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Auditory cortex development
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): the fNIRS is a non-invasive brain imaging method that uses brain maps to assess changes in auditory and speech-related cortex.
Preoperation, week 13, week 26 and week 52
Psychological status
Time Frame: Preoperation, week 26 and week 52
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ): the SDQ is a psychological status test with a total score of 25 points. The lower the score the better the psychological status.
Preoperation, week 26 and week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yilai Shu, M.D. & Ph.D., Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 3, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Subscribe