Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses

August 20, 2024 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.

A Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses (Iteration Under Umbrella Protocol C19-678)

This study was designed to gather short-term clinical performance data for 2 soft contact lenses.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this participant-masked, non-randomized, crossover controlled, non-dispensing, study was to compare the short-term performance of 2 daily disposable contact lenses after 15 minutes of daily wear each. The lenses were identical in all aspects except for diameter. Participants attended for 1 visit only which lasted for approximately 2 hours.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9PL
        • Eurolens Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:

    1. They were of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer.
    2. They understood their rights as a research subject and were willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
    3. They were willing and able to follow the protocol.
    4. They were wearing soft contact lenses, or had done so within the past two years.
    5. They were able to be fitted with the study lenses within the power range available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will not be eligible if:

    1. They had an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
    2. They had a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
    3. They were using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
    4. They were aphakic.
    5. They had had corneal refractive surgery.
    6. They had any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or had keratoconus.
    7. They were pregnant or lactating.
    8. They had an eye or health condition including an immunosuppressive or infectious disease which could, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
    9. They had taken part in any contact lens or care system clinical research within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lens 1
All participants wore Lens 1 for 15 minutes (Period 1)
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens (diameter=14.0mm) for 15 minutes
Experimental: Lens 2
All participants wore Lens 2 for 15 minutes (Period 2)
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens (diameter=14.1mm) for 15 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Overall Score
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Subjective overall score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, unmanageable, cannot use lenses and 100=Excellent, highly impressed with these lenses overall
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Comfort
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Subjective comfort score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely uncomfortable, causes pain, cannot be tolerated and 100=Excellent, cannot be felt
15 minutes
Subjective Vision
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Subjective vision score was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, intolerable, lens cannot be worn and 100=Excellent, unaware of any visual loss
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carole Maldonado-Codina, PhD MCOptom, Eurolens Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EX-MKTG-154

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Lens 1

Subscribe