Auto-Adjustable MOBIDERm Autofit Armsleeve in the Management of Upper Limb Lymphedema. (LyberT)

September 20, 2024 updated by: Thuasne

A Multicenter, Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Auto-Adjustable MOBIDERL Autofit Armsleeve in the Management of Upper Limb Lymphedema. (LyberT)

This study aims to assess Auto-Adjustable MOBIDERM® Autofit Armsleeve effect on upper limb volume excess compared to the compression bandages to manage the volume of upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall range of compression devices dedicated to lymphedema treatment offers standard or custom-made garments and different types of bandages. Indeed, bandages are not easy to put on, requiring specific patient's skills and/or assistance which is not optimal for long-term compliance. Moreover, they are composed of several layers forming a quite bulky multilayer bandage that limits limb function and does not contribute to a better quality of life. For all these reasons described, even if bandaging is the current reference of lymphedema treatment, they have disadvantages.

The day-time elastic compressive armsleeves are proposed as an alternative to bandages. However, whatever their standard or custom-made design, they cannot adapt to limb volume/morphology evolution on the long-term management of this chronic disease because they are not adjustable. Therefore, as the comfort of treatment is very important in improving compliance, armsleeves are sometimes poorly tolerated by patients resulting in decreasing compliance to treatment plan.

In order to optimize treatment of lymphedema efficacy, THUASNE developed the standard Auto-Adjustable Armsleeve using the MOBIDERM technology.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara
        • Contact:
          • Burcu DUYUR ÇAKIT
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Pinar BORMAN
        • Contact:
          • Pinar BORMAN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral secondary upper limb lymphedema of stage II or III according to the criteria defined by the International Society of Lymphology, following breast cancer
  • Volume difference between affected and healthy arm ≥ 10%
  • Affected arm that fits with one of the 6 standard sizes of the Auto- Adjustable MOBIDERM Autofit armsleeve provided.
  • Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage I lymphedema or located in several places.
  • Patients for whom compression is contraindicated.
  • Lymphedema associated with active cancer needing acute chemotherapy or having recurrence or metastasis.
  • Motor and sensitive neurological deficiency / psychiatric or addictive disorders
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
  • Patient intolerant to MOBIDERM Autofit or known allergies to the components used.
  • Participation to any other clinical study which has an impact on the different endpoints
  • Vulnerable patient, adults being the object of a legal protective measure or enable to express their consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group : compressive bandaging

Control group : compressive bandaging:

  • Intensive phase (3 weeks): compressive bandaging (day and night-time) according to the usual practice
  • Maintenance phase (5 weeks): usual compression sleeve during the day + Self bandages at night

In the control group, during the intensive phase, patients wear compressive bandaging day and night-time, according to the usual practice during 3 weeks.

During the maintenance phase, patients wear usual compression sleeve during the day and self bandages at night during 5 weeks

Experimental: Intervention group: MOBIDERM Autofit Armsleeve

Intervention group: MOBIDERM Autofit Armsleeve

  • Intensive phase (3 weeks): MOBIDERM Autofit Armsleeve (day and night-time)
  • Maintenance phase (5 weeks): usual compression sleeve during the day + MOBIDERM Autofit Armsleeve at night

In the intervention group, during the intensive phase, patients wear day and night MOBIDERM AUTOFIT during 3 weeks.

During the maintenance phase, patients wear usual compression sleeve during the day and MOBIDERM Autofit Armsleeve at night during 5 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume excess variation
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare between both groups the volume evolution of the upper limb between inclusion and the end of the study. Limb Volume is calculated with truncated cone formula.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resource consumption
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
Resource consumption is measured by time of transports (travel time in minutes).
3 and 8 weeks
Resource consumption
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
Resource consumption is measured by number of used medical devices (number).
3 and 8 weeks
Resource consumption
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
Resource consumption is measured by the number and duration (per minute) of lymphedema-related healthcare consultations and hospitalizations.
3 and 8 weeks
Lymphedema related Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
The evolution of QoL is measured by LYMQOL ARM self-questionnaire and specific questions. This tool is designed as patient-completed questionnaire. The questions cover four domains : symptoms, body image/appearance, function, mood. Each item in each domain is scored : not at all (1), a little (2), Quite a bit (3), A lot (4). Specific questions are about patient's perception of benefit
3 and 8 weeks
Doctors' opinion on improving the patient's health condition
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
Doctors' opinion on improving the patient's health condition caused by lymphedema is measured by the CGI-I questionnaire (Clinical Global Improvement Impression). This questionnaire allows doctors to evaluate the improvement of patients. The scale has 7 levels from "very strongly improved"(better outcome) to "very strongly aggravated"(worse outcome).Intermediate levels are: " Significantly improved " ; " Slightly improved " ; " No improvement " ; " Slightly aggravated " ; " Seriously aggravated "
3 and 8 weeks
Patient's opinion on Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
Patient's opinion on Global Impression of Change about her general condition is measured by the PGI-C questionnaire (Patient's opinion on Global Impression of Change). The scale has 7 levels from "no change or condition has got worsed"(worse outcome) to "a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference ( better outcome)". Intermediate levels are: "almost the same, hardly any change at all"; "a little better, but no noticeable change", "somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference"; "moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change"; "better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference
3 and 8 weeks
Satisfaction about the device
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Patient's satisfaction with regards to MOBIDERM® Autofit vs bandages is measured by a satisfaction questionnaire. This questionnaire is focused on the product positioning with a question with 4 levels: very easy (better outcome), easy, difficult, very difficult (worse outcome) and the comfort with a question with 4 levels very comfortable (better outcome), comfortable, uncomfortable, very uncomfortable (worse outcome).
8 weeks
The safety
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number and type of serious and non-serious Adverse Device Effects (ADE).
8 weeks
Compliance to treatment
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The compliance to treatment (day-time and night-time) is reported by the physician in the e-CRF according to the patient diary. The compliance is measured in number of days and or nights when the device is worn and the average wearing time
8 weeks
General quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks

The evolution of QoL is measured by the EQ5D3L questionnaire completed by the patient. The EQ-5D3L questionnaire has two components: health state description and evaluation.

In the description part, health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems (Level 1 is coded as a '1'), moderate problems (Level 2 is coded as a '2'), and extreme problems (Level 3 is coded as a '3'). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

In the evaluation part, the respondents evaluate their overall health status using the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ VAS is measured by VAS : 100 corresponds to the best health and 0 to the the worst health.

3 and 8 weeks
Ttissue induration
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
The evolution of tissue induration is measured via the skinfibrometer (Delfin Tech).
3 and 8 weeks
Skin elasticity
Time Frame: 3 and 8 weeks
The evolution of skin thickness and elasticity is measured by ultrasound
3 and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Burcu DUYUR ÇAKIT, Ankara Training and Research Hospital Turkey

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EC 48 LyberT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphedema of Upper Limb

Clinical Trials on Compressive bandaging

Subscribe