Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions (EMPERATRIZ)

February 12, 2026 updated by: Fundación EPIC
Significant coronary disease of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is found in 4%-5% of all coronary angiography procedures. Classically, it has been determined that a significant angiographic stenosis should reach at least 50% of the vessel diameter by visual estimation, which corresponds to 75% of the vessel area. However, angiography has a number of limitations inherent to the technique and location of stenosis, and other techniques are therefore available for evaluation. Intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) deserves, together with the pressure guidewire, special consideration in determining the severity assessment (anatomical and functional) of lesions in this location. Using IVUS the most commonly used cut-off value is 6 mm2. in ambiguous lesions of the LMCA, a MLA >6 mm2 would indicate no revascularisation, a MLA <4.5-5 mm2 would indicate revascularisation, and MLA values between 4.5-5 and 6 mm2 would make it advisable to use FRF/iFR to decide. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is another intracoronary imaging modality, with greater resolution and significant differences from IVUS. no MLA cut-off point with OCT has been demonstrated for the management of LMCA lesions. Due to the differences in imaging with both techniques, the thresholds established as cut-off points in IVUS cannot be extrapolated to OCT. The objective is to compare the minimal luminal area by IVUS and OCT of angiographically intermediate LCMA lesions and to assess the prognostic value of TCFA assessed by OCT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Significant coronary disease of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is found in 4%-5% of all coronary angiography procedures. It is a particularly important site, since it supplies up to 75% of myocardial blood supply, and damage at this level thus implies a large amount of left ventricular myocardium at risk, with a mortality rate close to 40% at 3 years, if revascularisation is not performed.

Anatomically, it has a number of particularities compared to the rest of the coronary arteries, such as its larger diameter (5±0.5 mm) and variable length (10.5±5.3 mm), a composition, particularly at the aorto-ostial level, more similar to the aorta than to the coronary arteries, and in up to 20-30% of the population there is also a division between the anterior descending artery (LAD) and the circumflex artery (LCx) of a third branch called the ramus intermedius or bisector branch.

Classically, it has been determined that a significant angiographic stenosis should reach at least 50% of the vessel diameter by visual estimation, which corresponds to 75% of the vessel area. However, angiography has a number of limitations inherent to the technique and location of stenosis, and other techniques are therefore available for evaluation. Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS or IVUS) deserves, together with the pressure guidewire, special consideration in determining the severity assessment (anatomical and functional) of lesions in this location.

Several ICUV studies have attempted to find a minimum luminal area (MLA) as the cut-off point, ranging from 4.5-7.5 mm2, to decide whether to perform revascularisation or not. However, the most commonly used cut-off value is 6 mm2 for various reasons. First, it is correlated with functionally significant values using pressure guidewire. Second, the linear law is applied (assuming the fractal nature of the vasculature and a cut-off value of 3 mm2 for the LMCA branches). Finally, it has been validated by the prospective LITRE study with clinical results at 2 years of follow-up. Other studies in Asian population have proposed lower cut-off values (4.5 mm2). However, this population has different body size and therefore smaller LMCA size, the study has lower sensitivity (1/4 of patients with area >4.5 mm2 had positive pressure guidewire), and clinical validation is not presented unlike the LITRE study.

In addition to its value in diagnosis, use of ICUSE allows for optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if necessary, with decreased events as compared to angiography. Therefore, current clinical practice guidelines consider the use of IVUS to stratify the severity of all LMCA lesions as an indication IIa B. In turn, it has been proposed to integrate the use of ICUS and pressure guidewire in the assessment of doubtful LMCA lesions. Thus, in ambiguous lesions of the LMCA, a MLA >6 mm2 would indicate no revascularisation, a MLA <4.5-5 mm2 would indicate revascularisation, and MLA values between 4.5-5 and 6 mm2 would make it advisable to use FRF/iFR to decide.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is another intracoronary imaging modality, with greater resolution and significant differences from ICUS. It is an expanding technique. However, its usefulness in LMCA is somewhat more limited, mainly due to the difficult technique of complete filling with contrast and the native area of the ostial segments. Another disadvantage of its use in LMCA is its limited penetration depth (2-3 mm) compared to ICUS (4-8 mm), and since the LMCA usually has diameters of 3.5-4.5 mm, inadequate assessment may occur. In addition, no MLA cut-off point with OCT has been demonstrated for the management of LMCA lesions. On the other hand, because of the differences in imaging with both techniques, the thresholds established as cut-off points in IVUS cannot be extrapolated to OCT. There are, however, some correlation studies between ICUS and OCT, both in vivo and in vitro, but not specifically in LMCA. In all these studies, it has been shown that ICUS consistently overestimates OCT measurement by ≈10%, the latter being the closest to the real value. The underuse of this technique in the LCMA is justified by the potential technical problems already mentioned and the lack of a validated MLA cut-off point at this level. The potential prognostic implication of finding, even in patients with functionally nonsignificant lesions, vulnerable plaques or thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs) in OCT has recently been highlighted. The objective is to compare the minimal luminal area by ICUS and OCT of angiographically intermediate LCMA lesions and to assess the prognostic value of TCFA assessed by OCT.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alicante, Spain, 03010
        • Hospital General Universitari Dr Balmis
      • Aravaca, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron
      • Cadiz, Spain, 11009
        • Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
      • Córdoba, Spain, 14004
        • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
      • El Palmar, Spain, 30120
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
      • Gijón, Spain, 33394
        • Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes
      • Huelva, Spain, 21005
        • Hospital Universitario Juan Ramon Jimenez
      • Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, 11407
        • Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 08907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
      • León, Spain, 24071
        • Hospital Universitario de Leon
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
      • Seville, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Valladolid, Spain, 47003
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (Left Main Coronary Artery) (25-60% angiographic stenosis by visual estimation) in whom a study with intracoronary imaging technique is considered (at least one pullback with IVUS (Intravascular ultrasound) and OCT (OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY) from one of the main branches is mandatory)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years
  • Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (Left Main Coronary Artery) (25-60% angiographic stenosis by visual estimation) in whom a study with intracoronary imaging technique is considered (at least one pullback with IVUS (Intravascular ultrasound) and OCT (OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY) from one of the main branches is mandatory).
  • Patients able to give informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for coronary surgery regardless of significance of LMCA lesion.
  • Patients with LMCA lesion showing ulceration, dissection or thrombus.
  • Patients with lesion in a previous functioning arterial or venous graft in the territory supplied by the LMCA (protected LMCA).
  • Patients with acute coronary syndrome with potentially culpable injury in LMCA.
  • Patients unable to give informed consent.
  • Patients with ostial LMCA lesion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery lesion (25-60%)
OCT and IVUS in Patients with LMCA lesion (25-60%)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the agreement between minimum luminal area measured by IVUS and OCT in intermediate LCMA lesions
Time Frame: During intervention
To assess the agreement between minimum luminal area measured by IVUS and OCT in intermediate LCMA lesions in patients with PCI for MLA in ICUS <6 mm2 and OCT without TCFA.
During intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac Death
Time Frame: 12 months
Cardiac Death
12 months
Cardiovascular Death
Time Frame: 12 months
Cardiovascular Death
12 months
Acute myocardial infarction of treated/functionally assessed lesion
Time Frame: 12 months
Acute myocardial infarction of treated/functionally assessed lesion
12 months
Acute myocardial infarction of any lesion
Time Frame: 12 months
Acute myocardial infarction of any lesion
12 months
Need for revascularisation of lesion treated/functionally assessed
Time Frame: 12 months
Need for revascularisation of lesion treated/functionally assessed
12 months
Need for revascularisation of any lesion
Time Frame: 12 months
Need for revascularisation of any lesion
12 months
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Clear Image Length
Time Frame: During intervention
The cumulative length of the OCT pullback containing clear cross-sectional image frames according to the measures used for OCT approval. Corelab Ultreon.
During intervention
Extend of detectable EEL in LM
Time Frame: During intervention
To measure the extend of detectable external elastic lamina (EEL) in left main artery (LM) with the corelab ultreon software, defined by length in mm and circunferencial grades (up to 360º) of EEL
During intervention
Correlation between contrast volume used and results, as well as the average contrast volume used in the study.
Time Frame: 30 days after intervention
Correlation between contrast flow and total volume used and results, as well as the average contrast volume used in the study. The contrast flow and total volume would be expresed in ml/sec and ml respectively, and results will be determinated in the corelab with the ultreon software as interpretable images or not interpretable images. The average contrast volume in ml, will be correlated with the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy defined as the impairment of kidney function-measured as either a 25% increase in serum creatinine (SCr) from baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL (44 µmol/L) increase in absolute SCr value-within 48-72 hours after intravenous contrast administration.
30 days after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on IVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) and OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)

Subscribe