Spleen Preserving Surgery for Splenic Hydatidosis: A Cohort Study on Short and Long-Term Outcomes

February 24, 2024 updated by: Anas Aljaiuossi, Yarmouk University

Minimally Invasive Spleen Preserving Surgery to Treat Primary Splenic Hydatidosis: Short and Long Term Outcomes: A Cohort Study

This retrospective cohort study examines the effectiveness of minimally invasive spleen-preserving surgeries compared to total splenectomy for treating primary splenic hydatidosis in Jordan. Covering 18 patients from January 2015 to June 2021, the research highlights similar recurrence rates between both surgical approaches, emphasizing the benefits of spleen preservation in maintaining immune function and reducing septic risks, particularly in pediatric patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study delves into a detailed analysis of 18 cases of primary splenic hydatid cysts treated through spleen-preserving surgeries-laparoscopic partial splenectomy, cystectomy, and cyst deroofing-augmented by albendazole therapy. It presents a comprehensive comparison based on patient demographics, symptoms, surgical details, and outcomes, including complications and recurrence rates. Findings reveal no significant statistical difference in recurrence rates between spleen-preserving methods and total splenectomy, suggesting the viability of less invasive approaches for managing this condition effectively while preserving spleen functionality and minimizing post-operative complications. The study underlines the need for individualized treatment plans and further research with larger cohorts.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Irbid, Jordan, 22110
        • Anas Aljaiuossi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with primary splenic hydatid cysts, from January 2015 to June 2021. The study included medical records of 18 patients aged 14 years or older, diagnosed exclusively with primary, non-recurrent splenic hydatid cysts.

Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals under 14 years, patients in late pregnancy, those with recurrent cysts, extra-splenic involvement, or less than two years of postoperative follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (age 14 years or older).
  • Diagnosed exclusively with primary, non-recurrent splenic hydatid cysts.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children under 14 years of age.
  • Patients in late pregnancy.
  • Individuals with recurrent cysts.
  • Cases with extra-splenic involvement.
  • Patients with less than two years of postoperative follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Postoperative Short-Term Complications
Time Frame: Up to 1 month post-operation
The measure focuses on the incidence and nature of short-term complications following spleen-preserving surgeries compared to total splenectomy. Short-term complications may include infection, bleeding, or any other immediate post-surgical issues that impact recovery.
Up to 1 month post-operation
Incidence of Postoperative Long-Term Complications
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post-operation
This measure assesses the long-term complications associated with spleen-preserving surgeries versus total splenectomy. Specifically, it examines the recurrence of hydatid cysts as a significant long-term complication.
Up to 2 years post-operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Minimally Invasive Surgery

Clinical Trials on Minimally Invasive Surgery

Subscribe