Comparison of Patients Who Underwent Open and Minimally Invasive Fixation in Lateral Malleolar Fractures

January 3, 2025 updated by: Emre Kurt, Giresun University

Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Outcomes of Open Reduction-Internal Fixation With Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Lateral Malleolus Fractures

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative clinical, functional and radiological results of two different surgical methods, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis method and open reduction-internal fixation method, for lateral malleolus fractures in patients presenting with ankle fractures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial planned to be conducted at the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, Giresun University Faculty of Medicine, Giresun Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology.

The study includes patients who will undergo surgery for lateral malleolus fractures. No additional tests will be requested outside of routine clinical, radiological, and laboratory evaluations required during surgery, hospitalization, and outpatient follow-ups.

The routine treatment protocol for patients undergoing surgery for lateral malleolus fractures in clinic is as follows:

  • A detailed medical history is obtained, followed by systemic and local examinations.
  • Radiological evaluations, including comparative ankle radiographs (Anterior-Posterior, Lateral, and Mortise views) and computed tomography (CT) scans, are performed.
  • The affected ankle is placed in a splint. Elevation and cold application are performed. Embolism prophylaxis is administered with enoxaparin.
  • Anesthesia preparation is performed. The splint is removed daily for examination, and surgery is performed once skin folds are appropriate.
  • Post-surgical and outpatient follow-ups include routine ankle radiographs.
  • Prophylactic antibiotics are administered preoperatively.
  • Analgesics, including paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids, are administered based on the patient's pain level, provided there are no contraindications.
  • After surgical site monitoring, antibiotic prophylaxis, and analgesia control, the patient is discharged.
  • Postoperative follow-ups are scheduled for the 2nd week, 4th week, 6th week, 3rd month, 6th month, and 1st year.
  • For the first two weeks postoperatively, dressings are performed every other day, and sutures are removed during outpatient control.
  • Patients walk with bilateral crutches non-weight bearing for the first 6 weeks. If syndesmosis screws are used, they are removed with a day-case hospitalization under local anesthesia at the end of the 6th week.
  • Partial weight-bearing begins after the 6th week, and the load is progressively increased weekly. Crutches are discontinued 3 months postoperatively.
  • Ankle range-of-motion exercises are planned and initiated by the attending surgeon before discharge.
  • During outpatient follow-ups, the ankle is re-examined, and any patient complaints are evaluated and managed with appropriate investigations and treatments.

In patients who consent to participate in the study, the following data will be collected:

  • Demographic data: Gender, age, education level, occupation, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), affected side, lateralization, diagnosis, smoking status, alcohol use, comorbidities, and medications.
  • Follow-up data: Fracture etiology, time of fracture occurrence, fracture mechanism, soft tissue classification (Ostern-Tscherne), fracture type based on Weber and Lauge-Hansen classifications, preoperative hospitalization duration, time of surgery, type and duration of anesthesia, surgical technique, surgical duration, syndesmosis fixation, tourniquet use (and duration), fluoroscopy frequency and duration, use of drains (and removal time), postoperative hospitalization duration, use of tranexamic acid for bleeding control, discharge date, medications used during hospitalization and post-discharge, postoperative splint use, and syndesmosis screw removal timing if applicable.

Surgical approach:

Patients undergoing lateral malleolus surgery are operated on in the supine position under anesthesia with the hip elevated. A tourniquet is applied. Following the preparation of the lower extremity with povidone-iodine, the surgical method-open or minimally invasive-is selected based on the surgeon's experience.

  • In the open approach: A longitudinal incision is made over the lateral malleolus, followed by sharp dissection down to the bone. The fracture is reduced under direct visualization and fixed with a plate and screws.
  • In the minimally invasive method: A 2-3 cm longitudinal incision is made distal to the lateral malleolus to allow for plate placement. A periosteal elevator is used to create a pathway for the plate. The fracture is reduced in a closed manner using reduction clamps, and the plate position is confirmed fluoroscopically. A second longitudinal incision is made proximal to the fracture, and the plate is temporarily fixed with Kirschner wires. The plate is then used as an external guide, with screws placed through mini-incisions. The fracture is fixed with the plate-screw system in a minimally invasive manner.
  • Regardless of the fixation method, the surgical site is irrigated with saline, incisions are closed with sutures, dressings are applied, and a short-leg splint is used to facilitate soft tissue healing. The operation is then concluded.

Radiological assessment:

Fracture classification will be performed based on direct radiographs. Additionally, radiographic parameters, including medial clear space, tibiofibular overlapping, tibiofibular clear space, talar tilt, and talocrural angle, will be measured and compared with the unaffected ankle.

Planned clinical scoring scales and evaluation timelines:

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): Preoperatively, and postoperatively 8th hour, 24th hour, 2nd week, 4th week, 6th week, 3rd month, 6th month, and 1st year
  • AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) Ankle Score: Postoperatively 3rd month, 6th month, and 1st year

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giresun, Turkey, 28200
        • Giresun University Faculty of Medicine-Giresun Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria;

  • being a volunteer,
  • closed distal fibular epiphysis,
  • Lateral malleolus fractures operated for Weber type B or C fractures,
  • patients with regular follow-up in outpatient clinic

Exclusion criteria;

  • open fractures
  • fractures accompanied by pylon fractures,
  • fractures accompanied by talus fractures,
  • patients with a previous fracture/surgery of the same or another ankle,
  • ankles accompanied by arthrosis,
  • pathological fractures
  • multitrauma or polytrauma patients,
  • those with psychiatric or neurological diseases,
  • illiterate patients,
  • congenital or acquired deformity of the lower extremities
  • Patients who could not be reduced intraoperatively closed and who underwent open surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Minimally Invasive Surgery
Closed reduction of the fracture without opening the fracture site
Closed surgery technique: A 2-3 cm longitudinal incision is made distal to the lateral malleolus to allow for plate placement. A periosteal elevator is used to create a pathway for the plate. The fracture is reduced in a closed manner using reduction clamps, and the plate position is confirmed fluoroscopically. A second longitudinal incision is made proximal to the fracture, and the plate is temporarily fixed with Kirschner wires. The plate is then used as an external guide, with screws placed through mini-incisions. The fracture is fixed with the plate-screw system in a minimally invasive manner.
Active Comparator: Open Surgery
open reduction of the fracture by opening the fracture site
Open surgery technique: A longitudinal incision is made over the lateral malleolus, followed by sharp dissection down to the bone. The fracture is reduced under direct visualization and fixed with a plate and screws.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative Pain
Time Frame: Preoperatively and postoperatively 8th hour, 24th hour, 2nd week, 4th week, 3rd month, 6th month and 1st year
Patients were analysed for pain scores according to the numeric pain rating scale(NPRS) for the following periods
Preoperatively and postoperatively 8th hour, 24th hour, 2nd week, 4th week, 3rd month, 6th month and 1st year
Patient discharge time
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Preoperative, postoperative and total hospital stay and discharge times of the patients were recorded.
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number and duration of fluoroscopy
Time Frame: Postoperative 1st day
The number and duration of fluoroscopies used during the entire surgery for each patient is recorded.
Postoperative 1st day
Functional score
Time Frame: Postoperatively 3rd month, 6th month and 1st year
AOFAS scores were obtained at the follow-up visits of the patients at the following times
Postoperatively 3rd month, 6th month and 1st year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kürşad Aytekin, M.D., Giresun University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Minimally Invasive Surgery

Subscribe