Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic-Kidney (COMPAR-K) (COMPAR-K)

January 2, 2025 updated by: Alessandro Antonelli, MD, Prof, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic-Kidney

The Urology Unit of AOUI Verona proposes a clinical study aimed at a preliminary evaluation of postoperative complications specifically focused on robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) procedures using two currently available platforms:

  • DaVinci®;
  • Hugo®.

The questions it aims to answer are:

Does the estimation of the post-operative complications suggest something? Are differences (intra- and post-operative, oncological, functional, technical, and economic) among the three intervention approaches observable?

Participants will be invited to join one of these two experimental group:

  1. surgery with the DaVinci platform;
  2. surgery with the Hugo platform.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient aged between 18 and 90 years old;
  • patient with localized kidney tumor suitable for partial nephrectomy;
  • patient able to understand and sign the informed consent;
  • patient compliance with the follow-up program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient who do not fall within the inclusion age range;
  • patient not suitable for partial nephrectomy;
  • patient unable to understand and sign the informed consent;
  • patient unable to follow the monitoring program;
  • patient refusal to participate to the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DaVinci system
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is performed using the DaVinci platform
Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with DaVinci® Surgical System
Experimental: Hugo RAS system
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is performed using the Hugo RAS platform
Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with Hugo™ RAS System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Overall postoperative complications (% score >0) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery
Number of participants with moderate to major postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Moderate to major complications (% score >=2) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery
Number of participants with major postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Major complications (% score >=3) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Volume
Intraoperative
Overall duration of the surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Minutes
Intraoperative
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1-4 days postoperative
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 scale for the self-reported rate of pain: zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
1-4 days postoperative
Procedure-related costs
Time Frame: From surgical procedure to the end of follow-up period (6 months)
Estimate
From surgical procedure to the end of follow-up period (6 months)
Number of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Proportion of events
Intraoperative
Type of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Note of the event detail
Intraoperative
Number of intraoperative technical malfunctions
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Proportion of events
Intraoperative
Type of intraoperative technical malfunctions
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Note of the event detail
Intraoperative
Postoperative hospitalization
Time Frame: From the day after surgery up to 10 days postoperative
Days of recovery until the date of discharge
From the day after surgery up to 10 days postoperative
Positive Surgical Margins
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks postoperative (at the end of histological analysis)
Rate after histological examination
Up to 2 weeks postoperative (at the end of histological analysis)
Serum Creatinine dosage for renal function assessment
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Creatinine test
1 month, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate for renal function assessment
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months follow-up
eGFR calculation estimated by EPI-CKD formula
1 month, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Time taken for platform related timings
Time Frame: From the room setting, through the overall surgical procedure, until postoperative room restoration for each of expected 45 surgeries (through study completion: about 4 months)
Configuration of the surgical table, Draping, Undraping, Docking, Undocking
From the room setting, through the overall surgical procedure, until postoperative room restoration for each of expected 45 surgeries (through study completion: about 4 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro AA Antonelli, MD, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on DaVinci RAPN

Subscribe