Optimising Metabolic Management for People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on Integrase Based Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) (OPTIMAR)

July 21, 2026 updated by: Kirby Institute

A Phase III/IV Factorial Randomized Double-blind Trial to Compare the Addition of Dapagliflozin vs Placebo and Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Versus Pitavastatin in Patients With HIV on Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-based Antiretrovirals With Elevated Metabolic Risk

People with HIV are at a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) due to the effects of the virus and its treatment. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), a common HIV treatment, are associated with increased CVD risk and metabolic issues, such as weight gain and high blood pressure. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, however, have been working well in reducing CVD events and hospitalizations due to heart failure, irrespective of diabetes presence. They also help in reducing weight and blood pressure. Pitavastatin has shown to work in lowering CVD events in people with HIV, but its availability is limited. This benefit is thought to be common to all statins, but this has not yet been confirmed. This study will examine the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo on metabolic parameters in people with HIV with high metabolic risk who are on INSTI-based ART.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a 2x2 factorial, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III/IV trial with two randomisations performed centrally via an on-line system, stratified by site. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to dapagliflozin 10mg vs. Placebo; this randomisation will be blinded. Participants will also be randomised 1:1 within each group to pitavastatin 4mg vs. rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg; this randomisation will be open label.

Therefore, participants will be randomised to one of 4 groups:

  1. Dapagliflozin 10mg + pitavastatin 4mg
  2. Dapagliflozin 10mg + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg
  3. Placebo + pitavastatin 4mg
  4. Placebo + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg

With the following 2-arm randomised comparisons:

  • Primary analysis hypothesis: a+b vs c+d (dapagliflozin vs placebo)
  • Secondary analysis hypothesis: a+c vs b+d (pitavastatin vs rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg)

The study's primary and secondary endpoints described will assess both efficacy and safety/tolerability across randomisation arms. Follow up will continue to 48 weeks and endpoint measures will be obtained at 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Primary endpoint is at 24 weeks. The total number of participants is 300, with 75 randomised to each of the groups as listed above.

All randomised participants who have not withdrawn from the study will be invited to attend an optional observational follow-up visit at Week 96 (±6 weeks). The visit will collect longer-term post-treatment clinical, metabolic, cardiovascular risk, liver-related, medication use and safety data. No study drug will be supplied beyond Week 48, and no Week 96 CT coronary angiogram is planned. Week 96 data will be analysed separately as exploratory observational post-treatment follow-up data and will not alter the primary Week 24 or Week 48 analyses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital Ramos Mejía
    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • St Vincent's Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Austin Health
    • Tamil Nadu
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600113
        • CART-CRS
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Universiti Malaya Medical Centre
      • Abuja, Nigeria
        • Institute of Human Virology, Nigeria
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7925
        • Desmond Tutu Health Foundation
      • Bangkok, Thailand
        • HIV-NAT
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University
      • Harare, Zimbabwe
        • University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 40-75 years and at least one of the following risk factors:

    1. BMI > 7% increase or > 5kg weight gain since INSTI commencement, or
    2. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
  2. BMI ≥18 kg/m2 prior to INSTI commencement
  3. Currently taking INSTI-based ART
  4. Sustained virologic response, defined as viral load <200 copies/mL for at least 12 months
  5. Current CD4 >250 cells/mm3
  6. Informed consent for trial participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently taking a protease inhibitor
  2. Indicated to take or already taking high intensity statin
  3. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73m2
  4. Currently taking an SGLT-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonist
  5. Absolute contraindication or absolute indication to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy
  6. Absolute contraindication to pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, ezetimibe or combination of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe
  7. Pregnant or breast feeding
  8. Severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh B or C)
  9. Participants receiving any excluded/contraindicated medication
  10. Participants who are enrolled into an additional interventional study.
  11. Expected inability or unwillingness to participate in study procedures.
  12. In the opinion of the investigator, participation in a trial is not in the best interest of the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dapagliflozin 10mg + pitavastatin 4mg
Dapagliflozin 10mg + pitavastatin 4mg given as daily tablets for 48 weeks
Dapagliflozin will be administered as a comparator to the placebo to assess its effects on weight reduction
Other Names:
  • FORXIGA
Pitavastatin tablets will be administered as a comparator to Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe 10mg/10mg tablets to assess and compare their effects on LDL concentrations
Other Names:
  • Livazo
Active Comparator: Dapagliflozin 10mg + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg
Dapagliflozin 10mg + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg given as daily tablets for 48 weeks
Dapagliflozin will be administered as a comparator to the placebo to assess its effects on weight reduction
Other Names:
  • FORXIGA
Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe 10mg/10mg tablets will be administered as a comparator to pitavastatin to assess and compare their effects on LDL concentrations
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + pitavastatin 4mg
Placebo + pitavastatin 4mg given as daily tablets for 48 weeks
Pitavastatin tablets will be administered as a comparator to Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe 10mg/10mg tablets to assess and compare their effects on LDL concentrations
Other Names:
  • Livazo
The placebo tablets are visually identical to the active drug tablets and will be administered as a comparator to Dapagliflozin.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg
Placebo + rosuvastatin 10mg/ezetimibe 10mg given as daily tablets for 48 weeks
Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe 10mg/10mg tablets will be administered as a comparator to pitavastatin to assess and compare their effects on LDL concentrations
The placebo tablets are visually identical to the active drug tablets and will be administered as a comparator to Dapagliflozin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo on weight reduction
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mean reduction change in body weight across treatment arms at 24 weeks, defined as absolute body weight change.
24 weeks
To assess the impact of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin/ezetimibe on low-density lipoproteins (LDL) concentration
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mean change in LDL as absolute change from baseline to 24 weeks across treatment arms
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on body mass index (BMI )- weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on waist (cm) to hip (cm) ratio
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on waist (cm) to height (cm) ratio
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score (ASCVD) - calculation of a person's10-year risk (%) of having a cardiovascular problem.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on fasting lipids including: Total Cholesterol (mmol/L), LDL (mmol/L), High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) (mmol/L), Triglycerides (mmol/L)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on fasting glucose (mmol/L)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on haemoglobin A1C (%)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on measures of fatty liver disease: Liver Function Tests - Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L), FibroScan (kPa)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on inflammatory biomarkers (tested centrally on stored research samples)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of dapagliflozin vs. placebo from baseline to 48 weeks on Serious adverse events.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin/ezetimibe from baseline to 48 weeks on fasting lipids including: Total Cholesterol (mmol/L), LDL (mmol/L), High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) (mmol/L), Triglycerides (mmol/L)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin/ezetimibe from baseline to 48 weeks on Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score (ASCVD) - calculation of a person's10-year risk (%) of having a cardiovascular problem.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin/ezetimibe from baseline to 48 weeks on inflammatory biomarkers (tested centrally on stored research samples)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
To assess the impact of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin/ezetimibe from baseline to 48 weeks on serious adverse events
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in body weight from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Absolute change in body weight, measured in kilograms, from baseline to Week 96.
Baseline to Week 96
Change in waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Change in waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio from baseline to Week 96.
Baseline to Week 96
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Change in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, measured in mmHg, from baseline to Week 96.
Baseline to Week 96
Change in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Change in calculated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, expressed as a percentage, from baseline to Week 96.
Baseline to Week 96
Change in fasting lipids from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Change in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, measured in mmol/L, from baseline to Week 96.
Baseline to Week 96
Clinical events of interest after completion of study treatment
Time Frame: Week 48 to Week 96
Number and type of protocol-specified clinical events of interest reported after the Week 48 visit.
Week 48 to Week 96
Medication use after completion of study treatment
Time Frame: At Week 96
Current antiretroviral therapy and use of relevant concomitant medications, including lipid-lowering therapy, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, diabetes medications, antihypertensives and cardiovascular medications.
At Week 96
Change in liver fibrosis measures from baseline to Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 96
Change in FibroScan liver stiffness, measured in kPa where available, or AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index where FibroScan is unavailable.
Baseline to Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gail Matthews, MD, Kirby Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe