- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06317636
Propofol-Enhanced Assessment of Ketamine for Chronic Pain and Depression (PEAK)
April 9, 2024 updated by: Theresa Lii, Stanford University
Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Ketamine Given During Propofol Sedation in Patients With Chronic Pain and Depression
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare ketamine to a placebo when given as a single infusion during sedation in adults with chronic pain and depression. This study aims to:
- Evaluate whether ketamine is more effective than a placebo in treating chronic pain and depression
- Confirm that propofol sedation is a safe way to keep participants blinded to treatment
- Assess patients' comfort with the sedation process to improve future studies
- Explore whether patient expectations affects their pain and depression
Participants will:
- Need to qualify for the study based on stringent medical criteria
- Undergo sedation with propofol
- Randomly receive either a ketamine or a placebo (saline) infusion during sedation
- Complete several study assessments over 5-7 weeks
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic that has been in clinical use for more than 50 years.
In addition to its well-known anesthetic and pain-relieving properties, ketamine has repeatedly been found to have fast-acting antidepressant effects in patients with depression.
However, the mechanisms underlying ketamine's ability to treat chronic pain and depression are poorly understood.
A most basic question regarding ketamine's therapeutic mechanism is still unresolved: do patients need to consciously experience ketamine's acute dissociative effects to receive lasting analgesic and antidepressant benefits?
In this clinical trial, participants will receive either ketamine or a placebo when they are under sedation with propofol.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
32
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Theresa Lii, MD, MS
- Phone Number: 650-264-9442
- Email: tlii@stanford.edu
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 70 years old
- Comfortable speaking and writing in English
- Chronic pain present for at least 3 months
- Currently experiencing depression
- Able to comply with the study protocol and communicate with study personnel about adverse events and other clinically important information
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- One or more health conditions that makes study unsafe or unfeasible, determined by study physicians
- Regular use of medications that may have problematic interactions with the study drugs
- Participating in another clinical trial which may conflict with this one
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Ketamine
A one-time intravenous infusion of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg)
|
0.5 mg/kg ketamine infused intravenously over 40 minutes
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Saline
A one-time intravenous infusion of normal saline
|
0.9% normal saline infused intravenously over 40 minutes
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Intensity (past 24 hours)
Time Frame: screening; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
A numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) over the past 24 hours will be used to assess pain intensity.
|
screening; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Depression severity
Time Frame: screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
The 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) assesses the severity of depressive symptoms experienced over the past 1 week.
Items are self-rated on a 4-point scale.
Higher total scores indicate greater depression symptom severity.
|
screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Pain Intensity (current)
Time Frame: immediately before the intervention; immediately after the intervention
|
A numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) assessing current pain
|
immediately before the intervention; immediately after the intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number and severity of adverse events related to sedation
Time Frame: during the intervention; immediately after the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed through a combination of patient self-report, interviews by study staff, and surveillance of medical records by the research team.
AEs will be graded by severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening, and 5=death) and relatedness to the intervention (0=definitely unrelated, 1=unlikely, 2=possibly related, 3=probably related, 4 definitely related).
|
during the intervention; immediately after the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Proportion of participants who accurately recall intra-sedation events
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
|
Participants will be interviewed by study staff using the modified Brice Questionnaire, a set of questions asked in sequence to determine if the participant remembers anything between the time of induction and their awakening.
|
immediately after the intervention
|
Treatment guess
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention; 28 days after treatment
|
Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
They will also be asked to provide reasons for their guess.
|
immediately after the intervention; 28 days after treatment
|
Treatment expectancies
Time Frame: screening; immediately after the intervention
|
The Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS) measures the extent of positive and negative treatment expectancies.
Participants are asked to rate their agreement with 6 brief statements on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 7 ("Strongly Agree").
Higher scores correspond to stronger expectancies.
|
screening; immediately after the intervention
|
Pain interference
Time Frame: screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form assesses the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater pain interference.
|
screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Physical function
Time Frame: screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Physical Function Short Form assesses the ability to carry out physical tasks and activities in one's daily life.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Unable to do") to 5 ("Without any difficulty").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing better physical function.
|
screening; immediately before the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Number of painful body regions
Time Frame: screening; immediately before the intervention; immediately after the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
The CHOIR Body Map is a visual tool that allows individuals to indicate the location(s) of their pain on a human body outline.
|
screening; immediately before the intervention; immediately after the intervention; 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Change in pain medication utilization
Time Frame: 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Participants are asked to rate how their pain medication usage has changed compared to before treatment
|
7, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment
|
Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: screening; immediately after the intervention
|
A pressure algometer device applied to the upper trapezius muscle will measure the pressure pain threshold by applying a controlled, gradually increasing force until the participant reports pain.
|
screening; immediately after the intervention
|
Enrollment rate
Time Frame: from date of opening enrollment to the date of consent from the last participant, assessed up to 60 months
|
The total number of consented, eligible participants enrolled by the end of the study divided by the amount of time between date of opening enrollment and the date of consent from the last participant.
|
from date of opening enrollment to the date of consent from the last participant, assessed up to 60 months
|
Consent fraction
Time Frame: from date of opening enrollment to the date of consent from the last participant, assessed up to 60 months
|
The proportion of patients who are contacted by study staff for recruitment who provide written informed consent to study procedures.
|
from date of opening enrollment to the date of consent from the last participant, assessed up to 60 months
|
Participant Experience Survey
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
Participants are asked at the end of the study to rate their experience with study procedures and to provide feedback for improvement.
|
through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Theresa Lii, MD, MS, Stanford University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 11, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
March 19, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 11, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Mental Disorders
- Mood Disorders
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Depression
- Depressive Disorder
- Chronic Pain
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Dissociative
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Ketamine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 73487
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
De-identified participant data, study outcomes, and data dictionaries
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Available upon request after publication of the trial's primary findings for up to 5 years.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a brief proposal and statistical analysis plan for review and approval by the investigators and execute a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingDepression | Depression, Postpartum | Depression, Anxiety | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Clinical Depression | Depression in Remission | Depression, Endogenous | Depression ChronicUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTreatment Resistant Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric Depression | Refractory Depression | Therapy-Resistant DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Vituity PsychiatryRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Mild | Depression, TeenUnited States
-
University GhentUniversiteit Antwerpen; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.RecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildBelgium
-
Baylor College of MedicineUniversity of TexasRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Suicide and Self-harm | Depression in Adolescence | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of Cape TownNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedPostpartum Depression | Clinical Depression | Moderate DepressionSouth Africa
-
Washington University School of MedicinePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; National Institute of Mental...CompletedMajor Depressive Disorder | Treatment Resistant Depression | Treatment-Refractory Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Northern Illinois UniversityUniversity Autonoma de Santo DomingoTerminatedDepression Moderate | Depression MildUnited States, Dominican Republic
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteTerminated
Clinical Trials on Ketamine
-
Grace Lim, MD, MSNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPain, Postoperative | Depression, PostpartumUnited States
-
Ullevaal University HospitalUniversity of OsloCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFrance
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedKetamine Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic UseEgypt
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedPost Partum DepressionUnited States
-
Lotus Clinical Research, LLCiX Biopharma Ltd.Completed
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownBone Fractures | Dislocations
-
Antonios LikourezosCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of MichiganCompletedModerate, Deep Sedation