Reliability, Concurrent Validity and Minimal Detectable Change of the Step Up and Down Test in Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty

March 27, 2024 updated by: Sumeyya Tarkan, Dokuz Eylul University
The aim of the study is to measure the validity and reliability of the StUD test in patients with TKA. Forty-seven patients with primary TKA included in this study. The test-retest reliability of the StUD test was measured with 1-hour interval. Validity was assessed that the 30s Chair Stand Test (30sCS), the Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS) and Short Form-12 Quality Life Questionnaire (SF-12) were used as comparator instruments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was designed as test-retest research. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. This study was conducted between 2021 and 2022 at the Dokuz Eylul University Hospital Orthopedics Department, Izmir, Turkey. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample Size The NCSS Trial and PASS 14 software (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah USA) was used to conduct the sample size. Power of 0.8 and an alpha level of 0.05 were used. Previous research on StUD in patients with knee Osteoarthritis was noted good test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.87) (G. P. L. Almeida et al., 2021). The test-retest reliability of the current study was thus hypothesized to be excellent. Assuming a %10 attrition rate, a null reliability with ICC=0.75 and expected reliability with ICC=0.90, 47 subjects would be needed.

Participant Forty-seven patients with primary TKA who were operated on by the same surgeon using the paramedian approach were contacted by phone and volunteered to participate in this study. Patients with primary TKA who are at least six months post-surgery were included. Patients were selected and invited to the study by the surgeon and physiotherapist.

Statistical Analysis All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0) software. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests were used for the determination of the normal distribution. The difference between the pain levels before and after the trials was compared using the Paired Samples T test. The level of significance was determined p < .05. The correlations between the StUD and 30 CST, HSS, PCS12, and MCS12 were calculated to determine convergent validity. The convergent validity was analyzed based on the Spearman's correlation and was interpreted as follows: 0-0.09 = no correlation; 0.1-0.39 = weak correlation; 0.4-0.59 = moderate correlation; 0.7-0.89 = strong correlation; and 0.9-1 = perfect correlation. Paired samples' t test was used for comparing the difference between the first and second trials of StUD test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used assess the test-retest reliability. The ICC values were interpreted as follows: poor, <0.5; moderate, 0.5-0.75; good, 0.75-0.9; excellent reliability, >0.9 (Koo & Li, 2016). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated as SD×√(1-ICC) , where SD is the pooled standard deviation from the first session. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated at a 95% confidence level (MDC95). MDC95 was calculated according to following formula: MDC95=SEM×1.95×√2. All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0) software

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Dokuz Eylul University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with primary TKA who were operated on by the same surgeon using the paramedian approach were contacted by phone and volunteered to participate in this study. Patients with primary TKA who are at least six months post-surgery were included. Patients were selected and invited to the study by the surgeon and physiotherapist

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with primary TKA who are at least six months post-surgery
  • Patients over 40 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2,
  • having had other surgery on a leg with TKA,
  • having symptomatic hip OA,
  • having a history of knee or hip fracture,
  • having a previous orthopedic or neurological disease that prevents stepping

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step Up and Down Test
Time Frame: 2021
In the StUD test, the patient completes maximum number of step-up-down repetitions in 15 seconds.
2021

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30 Seconds Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: 2021
The 30 CST is a valid and reliable performance-based test to assess lower extremity muscle strength in patients with TKA.
2021

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score
Time Frame: 2021
The HSS knee score criteria are based on a total of 100 points. The score consists of seven categories: Pain, function, range of motion, muscle strength, flexion deformity, instability, and subtractions.
2021
12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 2021
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed with the Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12).
2021

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Dokuz Eylul University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STarkan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Step Up and Down Test

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Japan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe