Gait and Postural Balance Analysis During Head-motion Perturbed Standing and Walking in Older Adults (BALANCAR)

May 8, 2024 updated by: Ann Hallemans, Universiteit Antwerpen

Gait and Postural Balance Analysis During Head-motion Perturbed Standing and Walking in Older Adults - a Multisensory Approach by Use of Mixed-reality

The main aim of this study is to unravel the biomechanics of postural balance reactions during head-motion perturbed standing and walking in older adults who fall, while integrating the influence of frailty, sensory functioning and cognitive processing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Older adults above 65 years old experience falls at a rate of 20-40% annually, with women being more affected than men. Unintentional falls are the second leading cause of accidental injury death and a major contributor to disability levels worldwide. Falls pose an even bigger burden on society in the future due to the increasing number of older adults and the higher prevalence of falls as people age. Gait and balance instability are major risk and causative factors for falls in older adults. As people age, their stability decreases. This is evident in the careful way that older adults walk. To prevent and predict falls, it is essential to understand how humans maintain their stability during locomotor activities.

Balance disruptions are typically not caused by walking itself, but rather by internal or external disturbances or the performance of multiple tasks simultaneously. In daily life, people often face complex situations that require high levels of sensory input and cognitive processing. This can be especially challenging when also trying to maintain a safe walking pattern, such as when checking the environment before crossing the street. This task requires coordinated movement of both the head and eyes to track moving objects. Gaze control requires accurate cognitive processing, including multisensory integration, attention, executive functioning, and motor responses to coordinate eye and head movements.

Older adults use different strategies than younger adults to control head movement for stabilizing their head during walking. Therefore, changes in head position may affect gait stability differently in older adults. Ageing can cause frailty, decline in sensorimotor and cognitive abilities, and a reduced capacity to adjust gait to changing environments. These changes may increase the risk of falls in older adults. However, research on these issues is currently insufficient.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2160
        • Recruiting
        • University of Antwerp
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Community dwelling older adults with an age of 65 years or above

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community dwelling
  • an age of 65 years or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 65 years
  • medical history encompassing diagnosed vestibulopathy, orthostatic hypotension, peripheral neuropathy, limb amputation, neurological or neuromuscular disorders affecting balance, diagnosed neck disorders affecting sensorimotor control, blindness, deafness
  • a full-time walking aid is indispensable.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Fallers
Community dwelling older adults with an age above 65 years. A participant is categorized as faller in case of a history of ≥2 falls in the previous 12 months and with identified high fall risk on the TUG (i.e., completion time ≥13.5 seconds). A fall is defined as an event that results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground/floor/other lower level (WHO, 2021). Asyncopal fall, identified through the report of a loss of consciousness during the fall, has a different etiology and therefore will not be counted as a fall (Ang et al., 2020).
  1. The CatchU® app quantitatively and objectively measures the ability to integrate visual-somatosensory information using reaction time test data.
  2. Digit Symbol Substitution test assesses processing speed and attention by requiring individuals to match symbols with corresponding numbers within a specified time frame.
  3. Trail Making Test part 1 and 2: assesses cognitive flexibility, visual attention, and task-switching by having individuals connect numbered circles in sequence (part 1) and then alternate between numbers and letters (Part 2).
  4. Go/No Go test measures an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response (No-Go) and execute a response when required (Go). This test provides insights into executive functioning, particularly inhibitory control.
  1. Cervical Sensorimotor control will be measured through a wireless wearable sensor 3D-cervical trainer by Sensamove on the placed on the head of the participant. The 3DCT registers cervical position sense by the Head Repositioning Accuracy test where the subject must relocate the head to the previously memorized (neutral) head position with the eyes closed and the joint position error degrees are registered. Cervical movement sense is examined using 'The Fly'-test where the subject ought to follow a movement pattern displayed on the screen in front of them. The movement of the neck-head unit is there upon tracked by the 3DCT and projected on the screen.
  2. Vestibular function will be assessed through 3D-video Head Impulse Testing (vHIT), examining the state of the three semicircular canals by delivering the vestibulo-ocular reflex (vor) gain and vor gain asymmetry.
  3. For the assessment of static and dynamic visual acuity, functional Head Impulse Testing (fHIT) will be used.
Frailty will be assessed using the Fried criteria, comprising 5 categories (each accounting for 1 point if scored positive): Unintentional weight loss (interview), weakness (grip strength with hand-held dynamometer), poor endurance and energy (two statements of the CES-D Depression Scale), slowness (walking speed over 15ft through gait analysis) and low physical activity level (Minnesota Leisure Time Activity questionnaire)(Fried et al., 2001).
Markers will be placed on the predefined anatomical locations and surface electrodes for electromyography will be applied at the predefined muscle locations following the SENIAM-guidelines. The Microsoft HoloLens 2 is fixated on the participant's head which will, on one hand, provide the cue to the participant for the head movement and on the other hand track eye and head movements. A safety harness is attached to the body and the ceiling of the lab. At the start of the trial, the subject will see a projection by the HoloLens 2 on the real environment moving to the left; right; upward; downward (cue in randomized order) which the participant is ought to follow with eyes and head. First while standing still and second while walking the 10-meter overground walkway at a self-preferred walking speed.

The researcher will visit the possible participants (at their home, community centre, etc.) and after written consent on screening procedure is provided, the tests for eligibility will be performed.

  1. Interview: asking about age (years), gender (male/female), medical history and the number of falls in the last 12 months .
  2. Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) to check walking ability. TUG is a sensitive and specific measure for identifying risk for falls (Shumway-Cook et al., 2000).
Participants are followed up for 12 months. They fill in a fall diary and telephone reminders will be performed monthly to encourage participants to complete and return their diaries.
Non-Fallers
Community dwelling older adults with an age above 65 years. A participant is included as non-faller in case of a history of 0 falls in the previous 12 months and without an identified fall risk on the TUG test (i.e., completion time ≤13.5 seconds).
  1. The CatchU® app quantitatively and objectively measures the ability to integrate visual-somatosensory information using reaction time test data.
  2. Digit Symbol Substitution test assesses processing speed and attention by requiring individuals to match symbols with corresponding numbers within a specified time frame.
  3. Trail Making Test part 1 and 2: assesses cognitive flexibility, visual attention, and task-switching by having individuals connect numbered circles in sequence (part 1) and then alternate between numbers and letters (Part 2).
  4. Go/No Go test measures an individual's ability to inhibit a prepotent response (No-Go) and execute a response when required (Go). This test provides insights into executive functioning, particularly inhibitory control.
  1. Cervical Sensorimotor control will be measured through a wireless wearable sensor 3D-cervical trainer by Sensamove on the placed on the head of the participant. The 3DCT registers cervical position sense by the Head Repositioning Accuracy test where the subject must relocate the head to the previously memorized (neutral) head position with the eyes closed and the joint position error degrees are registered. Cervical movement sense is examined using 'The Fly'-test where the subject ought to follow a movement pattern displayed on the screen in front of them. The movement of the neck-head unit is there upon tracked by the 3DCT and projected on the screen.
  2. Vestibular function will be assessed through 3D-video Head Impulse Testing (vHIT), examining the state of the three semicircular canals by delivering the vestibulo-ocular reflex (vor) gain and vor gain asymmetry.
  3. For the assessment of static and dynamic visual acuity, functional Head Impulse Testing (fHIT) will be used.
Frailty will be assessed using the Fried criteria, comprising 5 categories (each accounting for 1 point if scored positive): Unintentional weight loss (interview), weakness (grip strength with hand-held dynamometer), poor endurance and energy (two statements of the CES-D Depression Scale), slowness (walking speed over 15ft through gait analysis) and low physical activity level (Minnesota Leisure Time Activity questionnaire)(Fried et al., 2001).
Markers will be placed on the predefined anatomical locations and surface electrodes for electromyography will be applied at the predefined muscle locations following the SENIAM-guidelines. The Microsoft HoloLens 2 is fixated on the participant's head which will, on one hand, provide the cue to the participant for the head movement and on the other hand track eye and head movements. A safety harness is attached to the body and the ceiling of the lab. At the start of the trial, the subject will see a projection by the HoloLens 2 on the real environment moving to the left; right; upward; downward (cue in randomized order) which the participant is ought to follow with eyes and head. First while standing still and second while walking the 10-meter overground walkway at a self-preferred walking speed.

The researcher will visit the possible participants (at their home, community centre, etc.) and after written consent on screening procedure is provided, the tests for eligibility will be performed.

  1. Interview: asking about age (years), gender (male/female), medical history and the number of falls in the last 12 months .
  2. Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) to check walking ability. TUG is a sensitive and specific measure for identifying risk for falls (Shumway-Cook et al., 2000).
Participants are followed up for 12 months. They fill in a fall diary and telephone reminders will be performed monthly to encourage participants to complete and return their diaries.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spatio-temporal parameters of gait
Time Frame: baseline
step length and width (cm)
baseline
Foot placement estimator
Time Frame: baseline
measure which estimates where the foot should be placed for stable gait
baseline
Onset latency
Time Frame: baseline
latency in msec between onset of movements and activation recorded by surface EMG of bilateral m. Erector Spinae (trunk stabilization), m. Gluteus medius (hip strategy), m. Tibialis anterior and m. Soleus (ankle strategy)
baseline
Peak amplitude
Time Frame: baseline
peak amplitude in microvolts of the surface EMG of bilateral m. Erector Spinae (trunk stabilization), m. Gluteus medius (hip strategy), m. Tibialis anterior and m. Soleus (ankle strategy)
baseline
Fixation duration
Time Frame: baseline
Duration of fixation of the eyes on target, measured by the Hololens 2
baseline
Gain
Time Frame: baseline
Accuracy of the fixation of the eyes on target as measured by the Hololens 2
baseline
Latency
Time Frame: baseline
Latency in msec between the movement of the target and the movement of the eyes and the head when following the target as measured by the Hololens 2.
baseline
Fall characteristics
Time Frame: monthly during 12 months of follow-up
Fall diaries provide information on occurrence and number of falls, activity preceding a fall, cause of fall, obtained injuries and potential care that was received.
monthly during 12 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multisensory integration
Time Frame: baseline
reaction times in visual/sensory vs. visuo-sensory conditions (ratio, in %) measured with CatchU app
baseline
Digit symbol substitution test
Time Frame: baseline
number of correct symbol-digit pairs completed
baseline
Trail making test
Time Frame: baseline
Time to complete part A vs. B (ratio in seconds)
baseline
Go/No Go test
Time Frame: baseline
Accuracy (number of correct responses)
baseline
Head Repositioning Accuracy
Time Frame: baseline
joint position error in degrees
baseline
Fly test
Time Frame: baseline
directional accuracy (in %) of movement
baseline
Fly test
Time Frame: baseline
Amplitude (in mm) of movement
baseline
vHIT
Time Frame: baseline
VOR-gain and VOR-gain asymmetry in %
baseline
fHIT
Time Frame: baseline
statfHIT (Static visual acuity): logMAR-score and dynfHIT (Dynamic visual acuity): % correct responses
baseline
Frailty
Time Frame: baseline
Fried criteria: Frailty level (categorical): non-frail (0/5), pre-frail( 1-2/5) or frail (≥3/5)
baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: Screening before inclusion
age in years
Screening before inclusion
Gender
Time Frame: Screening before inclusion
male, female or other
Screening before inclusion
Medical history
Time Frame: Screening before inclusion
presence or absence of diagnosed vestibulopathy, orthostatic hypotension, peripheral neuropathy, limb amputation, neurological/ or neuromuscular disorders affecting balance, neck disorders affecting sensorimotor control, blindness, deafness and if a full-time walking aid is indispensable
Screening before inclusion
Fall history
Time Frame: Screening before inclusion
number of falls in last 12 months
Screening before inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann Hallemans, Universiteit Antwerpen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6012 (Other)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gait

Clinical Trials on Cognition

Subscribe