- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06373627
Procedural Pain Management by Multimodal Sedation Analgesia Combining Hypnosis in Children With Congenital Heart Disease (PEACE-HYPNO)
Procedural Pain Management by Multimodal Sedation Analgesia Combining Hypnosis in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: a Randomized Non-inferiority Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Pain and anxiety are common in children with congenital heart disease. They are at risk to develop impaired pain signal processing, and tolerance to opioids and benzodiazepines due to repeated exposure.
Removal of thoracic drains is a standard procedure following cardiac surgery in patients with congenital heart disease. This procedure is usually performed after multimodal sedation-analgesia (intraveinous and inhalation drugs). However, the drugs used (ketamine and midazolam) can have significant side-effects, such as respiratory and circulatory depression.
A few studies have shown the efficacy of therapeutic hypnosis and distractive methods in children, but with a low level of evidence, unlike in adults.
However, none of these studies has evaluated therapeutic hypnosis in children with congenital heart disease.
Hypnosis would be an additional way of better controlling procedural pain, without the side effects of medication. This would reduce the dose of analgesic drugs and improve the pain experience.
The aim of PEACE-Hypno is to evaluate therapeutic hypnosis as a co-analgesic way of thoracic drain removal in children with congenital heart disease.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Marie GERARD
- Phone Number: 0672510756
- Email: mariegerard@ymail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sébastien HASCOËT
- Phone Number: 0140942429
- Email: s.hascoet@ghpsj.fr
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged ⩾ 6 years and <18 years.
- Postoperative cardiac surgery patients with intrathoracic drains (pleural or mediastinal).
- Patients affiliated with or benefiting from a social security or similar scheme.
- Oral consent obtained from minor children
- Written consent from the minor's legal representatives
Exclusion Criteria:
- Psychomotor retardation, cognitive/psychiatric impairment preventing self-assessment of pain
- Absence of at least 1 legal representative of the minor child
- French not understood
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hypnosis
Hypnosis + MEOPA + direct intravenous Ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) In the event of insufficient analgesia or failure of hypnosis, a 2nd dose of ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) may be administered.
|
A hypnosis session takes place in 3 stages:
MEOPA + intravenous ketamine (0.3 mg/kg)
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional sedation-analgesia
MEOPA + direct intravenous Ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) + direct intravenous Midazolam (50 µg/kg) In accordance with current service protocol.
|
MEOPA + intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) + intraveinous midazolam (50µg/kg)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Outcome : Pain evaluation by VAS self-assessment
Time Frame: VAS will be measured 5 minutes before the start of the procedure (T0) and at the end of the procedure (T1) to assess the average pain intensity during drain removal.
|
The use of therapeutic hypnosis in addition to a minimal effective dose of intravenous and inhaled sedation-analgesia does not change level of pain generated by conventional sedation-analgesia during intrathoracic drain removal in children aged 6 to 18 years with congenital heart disease, self-assessed by VAS.
|
VAS will be measured 5 minutes before the start of the procedure (T0) and at the end of the procedure (T1) to assess the average pain intensity during drain removal.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hetero-assessment by FLACC scale of the pain during the intrathoracic drain removal
Time Frame: Scoring of the FLACC scale by the evaluator through study completion (up to1 year), blinded to the allocation arm, based on the video recorded during the procedure.
|
The use of therapeutic hypnosis in addition to a minimal effective dose of intravenous and inhaled sedation-analgesia generates non-inferior pain to that generated by conventional sedation-analgesia during intrathoracic drain removal in children aged 6-18 years with congenital heart disease, in hetero-assessment by FLACC by a blinded assigning arm assessor.
|
Scoring of the FLACC scale by the evaluator through study completion (up to1 year), blinded to the allocation arm, based on the video recorded during the procedure.
|
|
Maximum heart rate
Time Frame: The maximum heart rate is measured during the intrathoracic drain removal, through the beginning to the end of procedure
|
Comparison between the two groups of the maximum heart rate during intrathoracic drain removal, measured continuously on a monitor.
|
The maximum heart rate is measured during the intrathoracic drain removal, through the beginning to the end of procedure
|
|
Cumulative doses of intravenous analgesics
Time Frame: Cumulative doses of intravenous analgesics refer to drugs administered from the beginning to the end of the procedure.
|
Comparison between the two groups of the cumulative doses of Ketamine and Midazolam used during the procedure.
|
Cumulative doses of intravenous analgesics refer to drugs administered from the beginning to the end of the procedure.
|
|
Respiratory depression
Time Frame: The number of respiratory depression is measured during the intrathoracic drain removal, through the beginning to the end of procedure.
|
Comparison between the two groups of the number of episodes of respiratory depression corresponding to a respiratory rate of less than 10/min, measured continuously using the scope.
|
The number of respiratory depression is measured during the intrathoracic drain removal, through the beginning to the end of procedure.
|
|
Parental satisfaction using Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Parents evaluate their satisfaction the day after the procedure (D+1), with a minimal value of 0/10 (e.g no satisfaction), and a maximal value of 10/10 (maximal satisfaction)
|
Parents evaluate their satisfaction about the procedure, using a VAS self-assessment.
|
Parents evaluate their satisfaction the day after the procedure (D+1), with a minimal value of 0/10 (e.g no satisfaction), and a maximal value of 10/10 (maximal satisfaction)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Edouard CHAMBON, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703.
- Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
- Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
- Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785-1805. doi: 10.1177/0962280216669183. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
- Chanques G, Jaber S, Barbotte E, Verdier R, Henriette K, Lefrant JY, Eledjam JJ. [Validation of the french translated Richmond vigilance-agitation scale]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006 Jul;25(7):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2006.02.017. Epub 2006 May 15. French.
- Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.
- Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
- Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet. 2006 Mar 4;367(9512):766-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68230-5.
- Crellin D, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Babl FE. Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain. J Pain Res. 2021 Mar 31;14:881-892. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S267839. eCollection 2021.
- Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Parker JA. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
- Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Babl FE. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use? Pain. 2015 Nov;156(11):2132-2151. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000305.
- Staveski SL, Boulanger K, Erman L, Lin L, Almgren C, Journel C, Roth SJ, Golianu B. The Impact of Massage and Reading on Children's Pain and Anxiety After Cardiovascular Surgery: A Pilot Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;19(8):725-732. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001615.
- Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedure-related pain in children and adolescents: a comprehensive methodological review. J Behav Med. 2009 Aug;32(4):328-39. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9207-6. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
- Geagea D, Tyack Z, Kimble R, Polito V, Ayoub B, Terhune DB, Griffin B. Clinical Hypnosis for Procedural Pain and Distress in Children: A Scoping Review. Pain Med. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):661-702. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac186.
- Chester SJ, Stockton K, De Young A, Kipping B, Tyack Z, Griffin B, Chester RL, Kimble RM. Effectiveness of medical hypnosis for pain reduction and faster wound healing in pediatric acute burn injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Apr 29;17(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1346-9.
- Rodrigues VBM, Costa LR, Correa de Faria P. Parents' satisfaction with paediatric dental treatment under sedation: A cross-sectional study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 May;31(3):337-343. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12661. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
- Abdolkarimi B, Zareifar S, Golestani Eraghi M, Saleh F. Comparison Effect of Intravenous Ketamine with Pethidine for Analgesia and Sedation during Bone Marrow Procedures in Oncologic Children: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2016 Oct 1;10(4):206-211.
- Chiaretti A, Ruggiero A, Barbi E, Pierri F, Maurizi P, Fantacci C, Bersani G, Riccardi R. Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric oncologic procedures performed by non-anesthesiologists. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;57(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23170. Epub 2011 May 16.
- Rayala S, Kyander M, Haridass V, Palat G, Strom A, Wiebe T, Brun E, Segerlantz M. Low-dose Oral Ketamine as a Procedural Analgesia in Pediatric Cancer Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Aspirations at a Resource-limited Cancer Hospital in India. Indian J Palliat Care. 2019 Oct-Dec;25(4):501-507. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_110_19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-A00534-43
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Congenital Heart Disease
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingAdult Congenital Heart Disease | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) | Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease | Heart Transplant PatientsItaly
-
Seoul National University HospitalUniversity of SeoulNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) | Complex Congenital Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
University of UlsterBelfast Health and Social Care TrustCompletedCongenital Heart Disease | Congenital Heart Defect | Adult Congenital Heart DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
China National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesPeking University; Shandong University; Guangxi Medical University; Wenzhou Medical... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingStructural Heart Disease | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)China
-
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University...Beijing Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)China
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHeart Disease CongenitalUnited States
-
Martin SchweigerUniversity Children's Hospital, ZurichRecruitingFontan Physiology | Congenital Heart Disease in Children | Congenital Heart SurgerySwitzerland
-
University Hospital, BordeauxNot yet recruitingCHD - Congenital Heart DiseaseFrance
-
Leiden University Medical CenterRecruitingAdult Congenital Heart DiseaseNetherlands
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Hypnosis
-
Rennes University HospitalCompleted
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceRecruitingCancer | Alzheimer Disease | Myocarditis | ParkinsonFrance
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalCompleted
-
Lone Knudsen, MSc Psych, PhDTerminated
-
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, FranceRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedUsing Virtual Reality to Prevent Pre-operative Anxiety in Ambulatory Surgery Patients (PACAH-UCA HV)Surgery | Hallux ValgusFrance
-
University of WashingtonNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyCompleted
-
Babes-Bolyai UniversityCompleted
-
Women's and Children's Hospital, AustraliaCompletedPregnancy | LaborAustralia
-
HASSAN 1st universityRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Preoperative Anxiety | Hypnosis | Length of Stay | Abdominal SurgeriesMorocco