Adaptive Platform Trial for Personnalisation of Sepsis Treatment in Children and Adults: a Multi-national, Treatable Traits-guided, Adaptive, Exploratory, Bayesian Basket Trial (PALETTE)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

PALETTE- Adaptive Platform Trial for Personnalisation of Sepsis Treatment in Children and Adults: a Multi-national, Treatable Traits-guided, Adaptive, Exploratory, Bayesian Basket Trial

PALETTE is a perpetual adaptive platform to efficiently study sepsis interventions within 'treatable traits' in all-ages patients enabling prompt evaluation of pandemic treatments. Treatable traits, therapeutic targets identified by phenotypes or endotypes (defined by biological mechanism or by treatment response) through validated biomarkers (measurable characteristic reflecting normal or pathogenic processes, or treatment responses), may include multi-omics, cellular, immune, metabolic, endocrine features, or intelligent algorithms. PALETTE Bayesian adaptive design enables parallel investigations of multiple interventions for sepsis, and quick inclusion of pandemic pathogens. PALETTE's new conceptual model will respond to the challenges of standard approaches, i.e. series of sepsis trials, each investigating one or two interventions, expensive, time consuming, and inappropriate in pandemic context.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Platform inclusion criteria will be:

  • All genders patients
  • Aged >37 weeks corrected gestational age
  • Sepsis as per Sepsis-3 definition for adults, and as per the PHOENIX sepsis for children

Briefly, all following criteria will be required:

  1. Documented or suspected infection,
  2. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 for adults, and PHOENIX sepsis score of ≥2 for children.

    • Health insurance

Platform exclusion criteria:

Any of the following:

  • Refusal to consent for participating in the study,
  • Pregnancy measured by beta-HCG blood levels
  • Breast feeding
  • Acute coronary disease in the past 3 months
  • Stroke episode in the past 3 months
  • Any condition for which patient's primary physician will consider inappropriate enrolling patient in the study

Treatable trait inclusion criteria :

  • Hyperinflammation : Subphenotypes Beta, Delta, Gamma for adults; Subphenotypes PedSep-B, C, D for children
  • Hypoinflammation : lymphocytes count < 1.0 × 10^9/L
  • Macrophage Activation Like Syndrome : Ferritin >4,420 ng/mL for adults, Ferritin >500 ng/mL for children
  • Corticosteroids: Positive for i-RECORDS algorithm signature
  • Hypercoagulation (adults) : Prothrombin time (PT)/INR ≥ 1.40 AND Platelet count < 150 000/mm3 or greater than 30% decrease in platelets in 24 hours
  • Hypofibrinolysis (adults): Plasminogen deficit < 0.5 µmol/L

There are also inclusion and exclusion criteria related to treatable traits and interventions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hyperinflammation : Tocilizumab
8 mg per kilogram of body weight enterally (oral or via a gastric tube) once daily for 14 days (or hospital discharge pending which will occur first) (same for adults and children)
Experimental: Hyperinflammation: Baricitinib
4mg, enterally (oral or via a gastric tube) once daily for 14 days (or hospital discharge pending which will occur first) (same for adults and children)
Experimental: Hyperinflammation: Anakinra
100 mg subcutaneously once daily for 10 days (or hospital discharge pending which will occur first) (same for adults and children)
Experimental: Hyperinflammation : blood purification with MTx.100 Plasma Adsorption Column
up to 4 hours a day, up to four days in a row
Active Comparator: Hyperinflammation : usual care
Usual care
Experimental: Hypoinflammation : G CSF filgrastim
Therapeutic unfractionated heparin (UFH) starting at 400 (in children: 20 IU/kg/h) IU/kg/24h (target between 0.3 and 0.5 IU/ml), adapted to the therapeutic Partial Thromboplastin Time targeting values in the range of 60 to 100 seconds, with lower intensity dosing in the range of 60 to 80 seconds, for 7 days (or ICU discharge, pending which will occur first).
0.5 MIU (5μg)/kg/day subcutaneously for 5 consecutive days (or up to ICU discharge pending which occurs first) - same for adults and children .
Experimental: Hypoinflammation : Interferon gamma-1b
rhIFNg subcutaneously at 50 µg/m2 if body surface >0,5 m2, or 1.5µg/kg if body surface of 0,5 m2or less, every other day for 15 days (or up to ICU discharge pending which occurs first)
Active Comparator: Hypoinflammation : usual care
Usual care
Experimental: MALS : Anakinra
100 mg subcutaneously once daily for 10 days (or hospital discharge pending which will occur first) (same for adults and children)
Experimental: MALS : blood purification with MTx.100 Plasma Adsorption Column
up to 4 hours a day, up to four days in a row
Active Comparator: MALS : usual care
Usual care
Experimental: Corticoids response : Hydrocortisone
50mg (in children: 1-2 mg/kg) IV Q6 for 7 days
Experimental: Corticoids response : Fludrocortisone
50µg orally (or via the gastric tube) once a day for 7 days (or ICU discharge pending which will occur first) (same for adults and children)
Experimental: Corticoids response : Hydrocortisone + Fludrocortisone
Hydrocortisone 50mg IV Q6 for 7 days + Fludrocortisone 50mg orally or via gastric tube once a day for 7 days.
Active Comparator: Corticoids response : usual care
Usual care
Experimental: Hypercoagulation : Prophylactic unfractionated heparin (UFH)
100 IU/kg/24h for 6 days
Experimental: Hypercoagulation : Therapeutic UFH
Therapeutic unfractionated heparin (UFH) starting at 400 (in children: 20 IU/kg/h) IU/kg/24h (target between 0.3 and 0.5 IU/ml), adapted to the therapeutic Partial Thromboplastin Time targeting values in the range of 60 to 100 seconds, with lower intensity dosing in the range of 60 to 80 seconds, for 7 days (or ICU discharge, pending which will occur first).
Experimental: Hypercoagulation : Therapeutic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
Therapeutic low weight molecular heparin (LMWH) tinzaparin, considering its contraindications, recommended dose ranges and monitoring if applicable, as follows: 175 (in children 100 U/kg) IU/kg/24h, for 7 days (or hospital discharge pending which will occur first).
Experimental: Hypercoagulation : Thrombomodulin
Recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) 0.06 mg/kg/j IV, for 7 days (or ICU discharge, pending which will occur first).
Active Comparator: Hypercoagulation : usual care
Usual care
Experimental: Hypofrinolysis : Sivelestat
0.2 mg/kg/h for 7 days (or ICU discharge, pending which will occur first)
Experimental: Hypofrinolysis : OctaplasLG
12 mL/kg on day 1; repeated daily from day 2 to day 5, provided that PT/INR remains ≥ 1.40 (This intervention will be opened for randomisation once a supply circuit is in place)
Experimental: Hypofrinolysis : Plasminogen
2,2 mg/kg/day (intravenous infusion) during 3 days.
Active Comparator: Hypofrinolysis : Usual care
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At day 28
Dual primary endpoint
At day 28
Number of days alive without persistent life-supportive therapies
Time Frame: At day 28
Dual primary endpoint Respiratory support: high flow oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or CO2 removal; cardiovascular support: continuous infusion of any dose of vasopressor or inotrope, or mechanical circulatory assistance; renal support: intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy
At day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: At day 90
At day 90
Overall Survival
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Overall Survival
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Number of hospital free days
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Number of hospital free days
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Time to recover walking
Time Frame: At day 90
At day 90
Time to resume previous social and professional activities
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Quality of life score for adults assessed by SF-36
Time Frame: At day 90

The Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

At day 90
Quality of life score for adults assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: At day 90
EQ-5D-5L : It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
At day 90
Quality of life score for adults assessed by SF-36
Time Frame: At 1 year

The Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

At 1 year
Quality of life score for adults assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: At 1 year
EQ-5D-5L : It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
At 1 year
Quality of life score for adults assessed by SF-36
Time Frame: At 3 years

The Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

At 3 years
Quality of life score for adults assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: At 3 years
EQ-5D-5L : It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
At 3 years
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Tolerance of interventions considering any grade of 3 serious adverse events.
Up to 3 years
Incidence of new sepsis episodes
Time Frame: At day 90
At day 90
Incidence of new sepsis episodes
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Incidence of new sepsis episodes
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Incidence of new unscheduled hospitalizations
Time Frame: At day 90
At day 90
Incidence of new unscheduled hospitalizations
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Incidence of new unscheduled hospitalizations
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Incidence of sequels in neurocognitive, neuromuscular; cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, metabolic, and immune systems
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Net benefit probability of intervention vs. control, assessed with a Generalized Pairwise Comparison (mortality prioritized over life-support-free days)
Time Frame: At day 28
The Generalized Pairwise Comparison (GPC) method will be used to derive a single composite outcome. Each patient in the intervention group will be compared to each patient in the control group. For each pair, a score of +1, -1, or 0 will be assigned according to prioritized outcomes: (1) all-cause mortality at day 28, and (2) number of days alive without life-supportive therapies at day 28 if both patients have the same mortality status. The net benefit will be calculated as the sum of all pairwise scores divided by the total number of pairs, corresponding to the probability that a randomly chosen patient has a better outcome in one group than in the other.
At day 28
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: At day 90
Standardized tool used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents (ages 2-18) It is a 23-item score divided in four domains : Phtsical functioning, Emotional functioning, Social functioning, School functioning The total score vary from 0 to 100. The higher the score the hiher the quality of life.
At day 90
Quality of life score for children assessed by FSS
Time Frame: At day 90
Functional Status Scale (FFS) : It examines 6 domains of functioning, and each domain receives a score of 1 (normal), 2 (mild dysfunction), 3 (moderate dysfunction), 4 (severe dysfunction), or 5 (very severe dysfunction). Final scores range from 6 to 30.
At day 90
Quality of life score for children assessed by FSS
Time Frame: At 1 year
Functional Status Scale (FFS) : It examines 6 domains of functioning, and each domain receives a score of 1 (normal), 2 (mild dysfunction), 3 (moderate dysfunction), 4 (severe dysfunction), or 5 (very severe dysfunction). Final scores range from 6 to 30.
At 1 year
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: At 1 year
Standardized tool used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents (ages 2-18) It is a 23-item score divided in four domains : Phtsical functioning, Emotional functioning, Social functioning, School functioning The total score vary from 0 to 100. The higher the score the hiher the quality of life.
At 1 year
Quality of life score for children assessed by FSS
Time Frame: At 3 years
Functional Status Scale (FFS) : It examines 6 domains of functioning, and each domain receives a score of 1 (normal), 2 (mild dysfunction), 3 (moderate dysfunction), 4 (severe dysfunction), or 5 (very severe dysfunction). Final scores range from 6 to 30.
At 3 years
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: At 3 years
Standardized tool used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents (ages 2-18) It is a 23-item score divided in four domains : Phtsical functioning, Emotional functioning, Social functioning, School functioning The total score vary from 0 to 100. The higher the score the hiher the quality of life.
At 3 years
Number of grade 3 serious adverse events
Time Frame: At day 28
At day 28

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Circulating levels of cytokines
Time Frame: At inclusion
At inclusion
Circulating levels of chemokines
Time Frame: At inclusion
At inclusion
Circulating levels of cytokines
Time Frame: At day 1
At day 1
Circulating levels of chemokines
Time Frame: At day 1
At day 1
Circulating levels of cytokines
Time Frame: At day 7
At day 7
Circulating levels of chemokines
Time Frame: At day 7
At day 7
Circulating levels of cytokines
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Circulating levels of chemokines
Time Frame: At 1 year
At 1 year
Circulating levels of cytokines
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years
Circulating levels of chemokines
Time Frame: At 3 years
At 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Usual care

Subscribe