Validity and Inter-rater Reliability for Early Recognition of Spasticity Using the Decision Tree Tool (I-REFER)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Merz Therapeutics GmbH

Initial Assessment of the Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability for Early Recognition of Spasticity Using the Decision Tree Tool

The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and Inter-rater reliability for early recognition of spasticity by nurses and physiotherapists using the decision tree tool.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The Spastic Movement Disorder (SMD) Decision Tree was designed as a tool to aid nurses, therapists and other healthcare professions recognize potential signs of disabling spasticity in the upper limb of post-stroke patients. The present study assesses validity and inter-rater reliability of the SMD Decision Tree comparing nurses and therapists with gold-standard procedure performed by rehabilitation doctors. Agreement was tested for "referral to specialist indicated" and "no referral to specialist indicated".

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hermagor, Austria, 9620
        • Gailtal-Klinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study participants are post-stroke survivors and patients of the Gailtal Clinic in Hermagor.

Participants were either sub-acute in-patients as part of the post-stroke rehabilitation program or chronic out-patients.

Participants are recruited using consecutive participant sampling. All sub-acute patients in the rehabilitation ward who fulfill inclusion criteria and agree to participate are enrolled. Additionally, chronic patients scheduled for botulinum toxin injections on the study day are also enrolled in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with a first sub-acute and chronic infarction of the middle cerebral artery / basal ganglia hemorrhage longer than four weeks after the event
  • Between 18-80 years old
  • Preserved insight and judgment capacity
  • Adequate language and task comprehension, attention span for 15 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with other neurological disorders
  • Participants who received BoNT-A treatment < 3 months before inclusion
  • Reduced vigilance and attention span (less than 15 minutes)
  • Participants with adult representation
  • Participants with severe language impairment / impairment of movement and action sequences

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the level of agreement between the nurse group and gold-standard group (trained, specialized physicians) in their decision for toxin treatment referral
Time Frame: Day 1-2
Nurses use the 3 domains of the SMD Decision Tree (passive/active movement, pain) to determine potential disabling spasticity indicated for referral to a rehabilitation specialist. Specialized physicians use standard clinical procedure to detect disabling spasticity.
Day 1-2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of the level of agreement between the physiotherapist and/or occupational therapist group and gold-standard group (trained, specialized physicians) in their decision for toxin treatment referral
Time Frame: Day 1-2
Day 1-2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Merz Medical Expert, Merz Therapeutics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Fheodoroff K, Waeschle B, Schuetzer M, Comes G and Wissel J (2026) Early recognition of post-stroke spasticity: the I-REFER study. Front. Neurol. 17:1735793. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1735793

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-stroke Spasticity

Subscribe