Respiratory Function Monitoring of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Chest Blunt Injury

April 24, 2024 updated by: Li Shu, Peking University People's Hospital

Respiratory Function Monitoring of Patients With Chest Blunt Injury With Mechanical Ventilation

The goal of this observational study is to learn about EIT in observing the application of lung protective ventilation strategies in patients with pulmonary contusion, particularly the impact on pulmonary ventilation blood flow ratio, oxygen, and condition. The main question it aims to answer is:

Can lung protective ventilation strategies improve respiratory function in patients with severe chest contusion? We will collect clinical data of participants who already taking lung protective ventilation strategies as part of their regular medical care.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Trauma is the leading cause of death among middle-aged and young people in China, with over 25% of patients dying from chest trauma. The incidence of pulmonary contusion in severe chest trauma is over 70%, and it is an important cause of respiratory failure and even death in patients. The occurrence of pulmonary contusion and respiratory failure in patients with chest contusion is a dynamic process, and Regional inhomogeneities of the damaged lung should be taken into consideration to develop improved ventilation strategies. Currently, there is no ideal monitoring method to evaluate the severity of injury, and guide the ventilation strategies. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging technique. It measures regional lung ventilation and aeration distribution by means of changes in electrical potentials at the skin surface of the chest wall during breathing cycles, which has been proven to have good practicality in patients with non-invasive ARDS and pulmonary embolism. In this study, we aim to characterize the physiologic effects of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on key mechanisms of regional lung protection, namely: recruitment, reduced atelectrauma, and improved ventilation-perfusion matching, by CT scan and EIT

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The cohort will be selected from a tertiary hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe chest contusion admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU);
  • Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 and/or Blunt Pulmonary Contusion 18 score (BPC18) ≥ 3;
  • Age range from 18 to 90 years old;
  • Mechanical ventilation;
  • Stay in the ICU for less than 12 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Perinatal women;
  • Expected to be mechanically ventilated for less than 48 h;
  • Expected duration of stay in the ICU is less than 24 hours;
  • There are contraindications for the use of EIT (pacemaker implantation, local skin wounds after chest surgery, etc.);
  • Accept extracorporeal membrane oxygenator;
  • Mechanical ventilation>7 days;
  • Confirmed ventilator-associated pneumonia;
  • Pneumothorax without drainage or presence of subcutaneous emphysema.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
EIT-PEEP group
The PEEP titration guided by EIT, decided by the responsible attending physician
The attending physician selects different PEEP setting strategies
Table-PEEP group
The PEEP setting with low FiO2-PEEP table, decided by the responsible attending physician
The attending physician selects different PEEP setting strategies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ventilation blood flow ratio
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
ventilation blood flow ratio of lung
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
oxygenation index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
oxygenation index of participant
through study completion, an average of 1 year
28-day mortality
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
28-day mortality
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mechanical ventilation-free from day 1 to 28
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mechanical ventilation-free from day 1 to 28
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of ICU stay
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of hospital stay
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The rate of successful weaning
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the absence of the requirement for ventilatory support, without reintubation, a cardiac arrest event, or mortality within 48h after extubating or withdrawal
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shu Li, doctor, Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 1 year after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the Investigator on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Contusion

Clinical Trials on PEEP setting strategy

Subscribe