Effect of a Tele-rehabilitation Programme in Children With Burns: a Randomized Controlled Trial

April 22, 2024 updated by: LIAO Peng

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare tele-rehabilitation and routine post-discharge rehabilitation in children with burn injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is tele-rehabilitation better for improving the quality and outcomes of care for burn children?
  • Is tele-rehabilitation more effective in improving scar management in children with burns injuries?
  • Is tele-rehabilitation more effective in improving perceived stress in parents of children with burns injuries?

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study, experimental group received a 12-week tele-rehabilitation program, which included face-to-face access to silicone pads, pressure garments, splint and other tools necessary for burn recovery. The tele-rehabilitation program was used for intervention and regular follow-up.

The control group also received a 12-week follow-up, but only on the basis of face-to-face access to silicone pads, pressure garments, splint and other tools necessary for burn recovery.

Researchers will compare whether the trial group has better the quality and outcomes of care and scarring for children and parents who perceived stress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Hongkong Poly Uiniversity
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria are based on the recommendations of the American Burn Association.
  • Child suffered from burn injury 3-6 years old and had survived the burn event.
  • The burn severity quantified by the total body surface area(TBSA)burned is equal or more than 1%.
  • TBSA burned is the estimated proportion of the body with second or third degree burns.
  • Burns involving neck, trunk,limbs and face.
  • Only Chinese parents will be recruited.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Insufficient parental Chinese language proficiency required to complete questionnaires.
  • Parents cannot use social software (such as WeChat, QQ, etc.) for video, picture, and text communication after discharge.
  • The main caregiver is someone other than the parents.
  • Children did not live at home with their parents, such as hospitalization, boarding school, etc.
  • Children who are receiving rehabilitation treatment.
  • Children who have other severe disease, like cerebral palsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tele-rehabilitation
experimental group received an 12-week tele-rehabilitation program, which included face-to-face access to silicone pads, pressure garments, splint and other tools necessary for burn recovery. The tele-rehabilitation program was used for intervention and regular follow-up.
Using the social networking tool WeChat, families of children with burns are educated and trained through texts, photos, voice messages, and live videos, twice a week for a total of 12 weeks
Active Comparator: routine post-discharge rehabilitation
The control group also received an 12-week follow-up, but only on the basis of face-to-face access to silicone pads, pressure garments, splint and other tools necessary for burn recovery.
Using the social networking tool WeChat, families of children with burns are educated and trained through texts, photos, voice messages, and live videos, twice a week for a total of 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The scars of children with burns
Time Frame: baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)

Ultrasound assessment of scar thickness, The DermaLab Combo assessment of scar Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL), pigmentation, hydration and elasticity.

The normal skin thickness is about 0.07-1.2mm, while the thickness of hypertrophic scars increases with the severity.

The DermaLab Combo® (Cortex Technologies, Denmark) is a commercially available skin testing device. It is a high-specification device based on proven technologies. It is an easy to use and commercially available device, making it a viable option for scar assessment in both clinical and research settings.

The worse the scar condition, the greater the Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL), the darker the pigmentation (the larger the value), the smaller the hydration, and the smaller the elasticity (the larger the value).

baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)
The quality and outcomes of care for burn children
Time Frame: baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)

The health outcomes burn questionnaire (HOBQ) for infants and children 6 years of age and younger is developed by American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children.

The HOBQ has a total of 55 items, calculated on a hundred-point scale, the higher the score, the better. Consists of 10 subscale, and each item is also converted into a percentage system. For the same score, the higher the better. There are 5 items for play, 4 items for language, 7 items for fine motor skills, 7 items for gross motor skills, 9 items for behavior, 5 items for family, 7 items for pain/itching, 3 items for appearance, 5 items for satisfaction, and 3 items for concern/worry. The number of items per scale ranges from two to nine. All subscales relate to the past month,except the subscale 'satisfaction'. The questionnaire has been translated into Chinese, and the reliability and validity of its Chinese version have also been confirmed.

baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
psychological stress of caregvers
Time Frame: baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is the world's most widely used instrument to measure perceived stress, 14 items,its Chinese version is widely used and has good reliability and validity. Each item in the PSS questionnaire is rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency with which they have experienced each event over the past month.The total score on the PSS can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate a higher level of perceived stress.
baseline , 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (post-test)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Wang Shumei

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20220424001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on tele-rehabilitation

Subscribe