Cardiopulmonary Effects of Prone Position in CARDS

June 7, 2024 updated by: Dicle Birtane, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital

The Effect of Prone Position on Right Ventricular Functions in CARDS: is Survival Predictable When Evaluated Through Transesophageal Echocardiography?

In coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related ARDS (C-ARDS), especially in the severe form, increased shunt rate, impaired ventilation/perfusion ratio (V/Q), hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction inhibition, and increased immune microthrombosis may have similar effects on the right ventricle .The cardiopulmonary pathophysiology and outcomes of C-ARDS vary, and this variability requires monitoring to follow the diagnosis and treatment process. This study aimed to increase the treatment success of the prone position in C-ARDS and to provide a prognostic factor for survival by analyzing and monitoring heart-lung interactions. Therefore, we used transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate the cardiopulmonary effects of prone position.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective study included 30 moderate-to-severe C-ARDS patients who were treated with prone position in the first 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation support. It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (PP) (T0), the first hour of PP (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment. Right ventricular end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA) was preferred right ventricular evaluations as primer outcome. Static compliance (C-stat) was examined in the evaluation of the pulmonary effect of prone position as secondary outcome.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bakırköy
      • Istanbul, Bakırköy, Turkey, 34140
        • Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

moderate/severe C-ARDS patients admitted to the Bakırköy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic Intensive Care Unit, who received invasive mechanical ventilation support and applied prone position in the first 48 h were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years
  • Patients diagnosed with polymerase chain reaction/computed tomography results
  • Moderate/severe severity class according to the Berlin ARDS classification
  • Prone position applied in the first 48 h after orotracheal intubation in treatment
  • Obtaining an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Pneumothorax
  • Heart valve disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Perforated esophageal varices
  • Coagulopathy
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Esophageal tumor
  • Neck fracture
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Previous stomach surgery
  • Previous esophageal surgery
  • Esophageal perforation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
group a
30 moderate-to-severe C-ARDS patients who were treated with prone position in the first 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation support. It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (T0), the first hour of prone position (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment.
It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography
Other Names:
  • t0
It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography
Other Names:
  • t1
It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography
Other Names:
  • t2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Right ventricular end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA) change during prone position.
Time Frame: It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (T0), the first hour of prone position (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment
It was preferred right ventricular recovery evaluation.
It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (T0), the first hour of prone position (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static compliance (C-stat) change with prone position
Time Frame: It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (T0), the first hour of prone position (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment
It was examined in the evaluation of the pulmonary effect of prone position as secondary outcome.
It was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography three times: before prone position (T0), the first hour of prone position (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 hours) (T2) after 23 hours prone position treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data available from the publication date can start If requested, data will be shared with medical doctors dealing with

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on before prone position

Subscribe