Intervention Trial for Healthcare Workers With Anxiety (CalmER)

June 8, 2026 updated by: George M. Slavich, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

CalmER Intervention Trial for Healthcare Workers With Anxiety

The purpose of the study is to conduct an initial test of the efficacy of Emotional Resolution (EmRes) therapy to reduce anxiety in healthcare workers. The investigators hypothesize EmRes will reduce levels of anxiety in participants compared to an active control group engaged in mindfulness-based gratitude.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

More than 1 in 5 adults in the US live with a mental illness, however, treatment is inaccessible to many. In fact, 63% of Californians with a mental health disorder do not receive treatment. Those who do receive treatment are burdened with long wait times. For example, the National Council of Mental Wellbeing reports the average wait time to access behavioral health services is currently about six weeks. Health care workers have been particularly affected by the inaccessibility of mental health treatment options, with nearly half of healthcare workers experiencing burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore it is important to explore new types of effective and accessible therapeutic techniques.

Many different therapeutic techniques are emerging that may expand the toolkit of mental healthcare providers to allow them to deliver new solutions to their patients. For example, therapeutic programs which target emotion regulation have been found to increase the efficacy of more traditional psychotherapy. Here, the investigators seek to test the efficacy of one such therapeutic technique, Emotional Resolution therapy, at reducing anxiety in healthcare workers. Because this therapeutic technique is delivered via zoom, and typically consists of only 6-8 sessions, it offers a promising solution to those seeking treatment in a more accessible and less burdensome way. If effective at reducing anxiety in healthcare workers, this therapeutic technique may reduce the burden on mental healthcare providers and help deal with the mental health crisis that is causing healthcare workers to quit due to burnout and burdening our society.

The investigators will recruit healthcare workers with anxiety to participate in the study who will be randomly assigned to complete either the target therapeutic or control intervention. Participants will be asked to participate in a baseline assessment and six one-hour treatment sessions across 9 weeks, a post treatment assessment, and a follow up assessment three months later. The investigators will collect micro blood samples and will provide a smart watch as compensation for their participation, which they will ask participants to wear throughout the duration of the study. Participants do not need to come into the lab to participate. All research activities will occur online, and devices and samples will be mailed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be able to provide written informed consent
  2. > 18 years of age at Visit
  3. Fluent in English
  4. Current healthcare worker in a hospital
  5. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) score of > 5

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide written informed consent
  2. Under the age of 18
  3. Not fluent in English
  4. Not working as a healthcare worker in a hospital
  5. GAD score < 5
  6. Currently on anxiety medication (Beta Blockers or Benzodiazepines)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EmRes
There will be six, one hour, treatment sessions across nine weeks of an Emotional Resolution therapy intervention program, a post treatment assessment, and a follow up assessment three months later. The sessions will occur over zoom with a trained emotional resolution coach.
There will be six, one hour, treatment sessions across nine weeks of emotional resolution therapy, a post treatment assessment, and a follow up assessment three months later. The sessions will occur over zoom with a licensed therapist.
Active Comparator: Mindfulness
There will be six, one hour, treatment sessions across nine weeks of a mindfulness intervention program, a post treatment assessment, and a follow up assessment three months later. The sessions will occur over zoom with a trained member of the study staff.
There will be six, one hour, treatment sessions across nine weeks of a mindfulness intervention program, a post treatment assessment, and a follow up assessment three months later. The sessions will occur over zoom with a trained member of the study staff.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EmRes Efficacy - anxiety change at follow-up 1
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)
The purpose of the study is to conduct an initial test of the efficacy of EmRes therapy to change anxiety levels in healthcare workers. The investigators hypothesize EmRes will change levels of anxiety from baseline to follow-up 1 in participants compared to an active control group engaged in mindfulness-based gratitude. This will be measured by the 8 item PROMIS Anxiety Short form. Responses to each item are summed. Scores range from 8-40, with a higher score indicating higher anxiety. A statistically significant decrease from baseline to follow-up one in anxiety scores is a positive outcome.
Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)
EmRes Efficacy - anxiety change at follow-up 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)
The purpose of the study is to conduct an initial test of the efficacy of EmRes therapy to change in healthcare workers. The investigators hypothesize EmRes will change levels of anxiety from baseline to follow-up 2 in participants compared to an active control group engaged in mindfulness-based gratitude. This will be measured by the 8 item PROMIS Anxiety Short form. Responses to each item are summed. Scores range from 8-40, with a higher score indicating higher anxiety. A statistically significant decrease from baseline to follow-up two in anxiety scores is a positive outcome.
Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived stress change at follow-up 1
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is used to measure the perception of stress. That is, the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful.

PSS scores are computed by summing ten items. Items 4, 5, 7, and 8 are reverse-scored. The range of the PSS-10 is 0-40, with higher scores indicating more perceived stress. As such, a statistically significant decrease in PSS-10 scores from baseline to follow-up one indicates decreased stress and is a positive outcome.

Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)
Perceived stress change at follow-up 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is used to measure the perception of stress. That is, the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful.

PSS scores are computed by summing ten items. Items 4, 5, 7, and 8 are reverse-scored. The range of the PSS-10 is 0-40, with higher scores indicating more perceived stress. As such, a statistically significant decrease in PSS-10 scores from baseline to follow-up two indicates decreased stress and is a positive outcome.

Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)
Burnout change at follow-up 1
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)

Burnout will be measured by The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) which contains 22 symptom items pertaining to occupational burnout. Investigators will sum the first two sections (where higher scores represent a negative outcome) and balance this against the third section (where higher scores represent a positive outcome). Scores will be calculated as a ratio: Exhaustion+Depersonalization:Personal Achievement. High ratios reflect more burnout, and low ratios reflect less burnout. A statistically significant reduction in burnout from baseline to follow-up 1 represents a positive outcome.

Exhaustion: 6 items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-36 possible. Higher scores = more exhaustion/burnout Depersonalization: 7 items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-42 possible. Higher scores = more depersonalization/burnout Personal achievement: 8 items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-48 possible. Higher scores = more personal achievement/less burnout

Baseline to Follow-up 1 (9 weeks)
Burnout change at follow-up 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)

Burnout will be measured by The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) which contains 22 symptom items pertaining to occupational burnout. Investigators will sum the first two sections (where higher scores represent a negative outcome) and balance this against the third section (where higher scores represent a positive outcome) . Scores will be calculated as a ratio: Exhaustion+Depersonalization:Personal Achievement. High ratios reflect more burnout, and low ratios reflect less burnout. A statistically significant reduction in burnout from baseline to follow-up 2 represents a positive outcome.

Exhaustion: 6 items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-36 possible. Higher scores = more exhaustion/burnout Depersonalization: 7 items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-42 possible. Higher scores = more depersonalization/burnout Personal achievement: eight items, scores are summed, with a range of 0-48 possible. Higher scores = more personal achievement/less burnout

Baseline to Follow-up 2 (18 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness

Subscribe