Effect of Care Provided Through Skin Care Protocol on Elderly Patients

October 25, 2024 updated by: Duygu AKÇA

Effect of Care Provided with Skin Care Protocol on Skin Moisture Change, Dermatological Quality of Life and Patient Comfort in Elderly Patients: Randomized Controlled Study

The rate of elderly population is increasing in the world. It is reported that the proportion of the world population over the age of 60 will increase to 22% by 2050. With advancing age, the skin is inevitably affected and becomes more vulnerable to possible damage. Additionally, as the skin ages, it undergoes many internal and external deteriorations. Intrinsic aging refers to biological changes that cannot be prevented to a large extent. External factors; exposure to conditions such as ultraviolet rays and radiation. In addition, in elderly individuals, conditions such as frequent washing, especially washing with harsh products, lack of hygiene, trauma, decreased peripheral satisfaction, immobility, incontinence, diabetes, vascular changes, malnutrition, use of multiple medications, depression, and dementia are among the situations that increase the risk of deterioration in skin health Hypotheses of the Research H0-1=The care given to elderly patients according to the protocol prepared has no effect on the moisture status of the skin.

H1-1= The care given to elderly patients according to the prepared protocol affects the moisture status of the skin.

H0-2== The care given to elderly patients with the prepared protocol has no effect on their dermatological lives.

H1-2== The care given to elderly patients with the prepared protocol has an impact on their dermatological lives.

H0-3= The care provided with the protocol prepared for elderly patients has no effect on general comfort.

H1-3= The care provided with the protocol prepared in elderly patients has an effect on general comfort.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The rate of elderly population is increasing in the world. It is reported that the proportion of the world population over the age of 60 will increase to 22% by 2050. This aging of the population is one of the most important factors affecting the population demographic structure of all countries in the world. These demographic changes create many challenges in all healthcare systems and care settings around the world. Age-related morphological and functional changes affect the whole body, as well as negatively affecting the skin, which is the largest organ of the body. With advancing age, the skin is inevitably affected and becomes more vulnerable to possible damage. Additionally, as the skin ages, it undergoes many internal and external deteriorations. Intrinsic aging refers to biological changes that cannot be prevented to a large extent. External factors; exposure to conditions such as ultraviolet rays and radiation. In addition, in elderly individuals, conditions such as frequent washing, especially washing with harsh products, lack of hygiene, trauma, decreased peripheral satisfaction, immobility, incontinence, diabetes, vascular changes, malnutrition, use of multiple medications, depression, and dementia are. Among the situations that increase the risk of deterioration in skin health. For these reasons, skin care and protecting the integrity of the skin are the main goals of acute and long-term care. Physiological and pathological skin changes occur in the elderly: aged skin contains less collagen elastin and fatty tissue; skin elasticity decreases and shrinkage of the subcutaneous tissue occurs, resulting in the appearance of wrinkles and folds; the skin also has a decreased sebaceous gland and sweat gland activity causes the skin to become dry (xerosis) and more fragile; Arteriosclerotic changes in small and large vessels lead to thinning of the vessel walls and reduced blood flow to the extremities and therefore skin microcirculation.In this study; A protocol that protects the skin health of elderly patients was developed and a randomized controlled experiment was conducted to determine the effect of this protocol on skin moisture, dermatological quality of life and patient comfort in elderly patients. This thesis study is a randomized controlled experimental study with experimental and control groups and three follow-ups. In a similar study in the relevant literature, the effect size for skin moisture difference was calculated as 1.25 in the study conducted by Milani and Sparavigna (2017). In order to exceed the 95% value in determining the power of the study; 36 people, 18 in the groups, should be reached at a significance level of 5% and an effect size of 1.25 (df=34; t=2.032). In the study, it was aimed to reach a total of 44 people, 22 in the groups, considering the high power of the test and the losses.Patient Information Form, Dermatological Quality of Life Index, General Comfort Scale, Elderly Patient's Skin Evaluation Subjective Data Form, Elderly Patient's Skin Evaluation Objective Data Form, Elderly Patient's Pressure Injury Evaluation Form, Skin Moisture Measurement (DMM Skin Moisture Meter Device) will be used. Research data will be evaluated with the SPSS package program. Statistical significance level will be accepted as p<0.005 and p<0.001. CONSORT 2018 flow diagram was used in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Turkey/Kars
      • Kars, Turkey/Kars, Turkey, 36100
        • Kafkas University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are over 60 years of age, able to communicate, have not taken a bath in the last 24 hours, have not used skin moisture care products, and have not undergone any surgery in the last 6 months who voluntarily participate in the study will be included in the study (Hannel et al. 2017, Matsumoto et al. 2019, Cowdell et al. 2020).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with extreme pain who receive radiotherapy chemotherapy, are allergic to any cleaning agent, and do not volunteer to participate in the study (Konya et al. 2021). He/she will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
After the patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are willing to participate in the study are determined, their consent will be obtained and pre-test data will be collected by applying face-to-face interview techniques (PIF), (DLQI), (GCS) at a time when the patient feels ready. Vital signs will be taken and recorded. Skin moisture measurement will be made with a DMM device. Braden Risk Assessment Scale will be applied. After the measurements, according to the care protocol, the patients will not be given care, they will receive routine care, then (DLQI), (GCS) will be applied, skin moisture and vital signs will be measured and the procedure will be terminated.
Experimental: Experimental Group
After determining the patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are willing to participate in the study, their consent is obtained and the protocol is applied by the researcher one day before the application, when the patient feels ready, using the face-to-face interview technique (PIF), (DLQI), (GCS), (SEF). Pre-test data is collected by applying it. Vital signs are taken and recorded. Skin moisture is measured with the DMM device. Braden Risk Assessment Scale is applied. After the measurements, the patient is given care according to the care protocol, measurements are made again in between, and then (DLQI), (GCS) is applied, and the skin moisture and vital signs are measured, and the process is concluded.
(PIF) (DLQI) (GCS) Data Collection Forms Humidity measurement with DMM device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Information Form (PIF)
Time Frame: one week
The patient information form (PIF) was created by the researcher by scanning the literature on the subject (Bickley et al. 2017, Güner et al. 2017, Tarakçıoğlu Çelik 2019, Kalaycı and Özkul 2019, Dinçer and Kurşun 2019, İn and Akça 2021, Çelenk and Kumcağız 2022, Bekircan and Okanlı 2023).
one week
General Comfort Scale (GCS):
Time Frame: one week
Kolcaba developed the General Comfort Scale (GCS) and published it in 1992. Its Turkish validity and reliability were tested by Kuğuoğlu and Karabacak in 2008. For convenience, the four-point Likert type is mostly used. Subdimensions of the scale; relief (16 items), relaxation (17 items) and overcoming problems (15 items). Positive and negative items are given mixed in the scale. In positive questions, 4 points indicate high comfort and 1 point indicates low comfort. In negative questions, 1 point indicates high comfort and 4 points indicate low comfort. When calculating the score from the scale, negative scores are reverse coded and summed with positive items. The highest score of the scale is 192 and the lowest score is 48. Cronbach's alpha value of the Turkish version of the scale is 0.85.
one week
Dermatological Quality of Life index (DLQI)
Time Frame: one week
The scale was developed by Finlay and Khan in 1994. Turkish validity and reliability were determined by Öztürkcan et al. (2006). There are 10 questions in total, the score varies between 0-30, and there is an inverse relationship between the score obtained and quality of life. It is attempted to determine to what extent the disease-specific symptoms affect people in the last week (Namdar and Arıkan 2019). Scoring is as follows: "quite a lot = 3 points", "a lot = 2 points", "slightly = 1 point", "not at all = 0 points" and "not relevant = 0 points", and the scale can vary between 0 and 30 by adding the points of each question. The total score is obtained.
one week
Elderly Patient's Skin Evaluation Subjective Data Form(EPSESDF)
Time Frame: one week
The form was reviewed by scanning the literature (Weber and Kelley 2014, Lynn 2015, Bickley et al. 2017, Şendir and Büyükyılmaz 2017, Karadakovan 2017, Bayraktar and Faydalı 2017, Jarvis and Eckhardt 2020, Berman et al. 2021, Demir Dikmen 2021) and "Leather Care Prepared in accordance with the protocol
one week
Elderly Patient's Skin Evaluation Objective Data Form (EPSEODF)
Time Frame: one week
The form was created in line with the relevant literature (Weber and Kelley 2014, Lynn 2015, Bickley et al. 2017, Şendir and Büyükyılmaz 2017, Çatıker 2018, Jarvis and Eckhardt 2020).
one week
Elderly Patient's Pressure Injury Evaluation Form (EPPIEF)
Time Frame: one week
Form-related literature (Şendir and Büyükyılmaz 2017, EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA 2019, Jarvis and Eckhardt 2020, Ersoy et al. 2018, Şendir et al. 2021, Horasan 2021, https://sbn.saglik.gov.tr/BKindeksi Access It was created in accordance with the date: 1.01.2024).
one week
Elderly Patient's Skin Care and Hygiene Evaluation Forms (EPSCHEF)
Time Frame: one week
The form was prepared in line with the relevant literature (Zaybak A, Güneş 2009, Uğur 2018, Jarvis and Eckhardt 2020, Berman et al. 2021, İn and Akça 2021, Potter et al. 2021).
one week
Skin Moisture Measurement (DMM)
Time Frame: one week
To evaluate skin moisture, measurements were made with the DMM skin moisture meter. The DMM device measures moisture in any part of the skin. The amount of moisture is measured from the outer surface of this device without causing any damage.
one week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Duygu AKÇA, Kafkas University, Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Study Director: Arzu KARABAĞ AYDIN, Kafkas University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-TS-53

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on pre-mid-post test

Subscribe