Anatomic Endoscopic Prostate Enucleation and BICEP Classification (BICEP)

November 14, 2025 updated by: Selim Soyturk, Necmettin Erbakan University

Multicentric Prospective Evaluation of Bladder Injuries During Morcellation Using BICEP (Bladder Injury Classification During Endoscopic Procedures)

The Bladder Injury Classification System for Endoscopic Procedure (BICEP) is designed to provide a systematic framework for categorizing bladder injuries that occur during endoscopic procedures. By standardizing the classification of these injuries, BICEP promotes a more consistent approach to diagnosis, management, and prevention across different urologic interventions. This study aims to validate and implement the BICEP system during morcellation.

This study will:

Validate BICEP by using real-life clinical scenarios to ensure its applicability and effectiveness.

Assess the incidence and types of bladder injuries during morcellation, using the BICEP categorization to standardize injury reporting and enhance treatment protocols.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Insufficient knowledge exists about bladder injuries during morcellation, as the existing literature primarily consists of isolated case reports. The Bladder Injury Classification System for Endoscopic Procedures (BICEP) aims to standardize the reporting and management of bladder injuries during endoscopic surgeries.

This study proposes an external validation of the BICEP system through an international, multicenter, prospective observational study. The objectives of this study are fourfold:

Validate the newly developed BICEP classification system with real-life clinical scenarios to ensure its applicability and effectiveness.

Evaluate the incidence and types of bladder injuries during morcellation using the BICEP framework to standardize injury reporting and enhance treatment protocols.

Assess the robustness of BICEP across different departments. Facilitate the adoption of BICEP as a global standard for classifying bladder injuries in endoscopic surgery.

Through this study, the validity of BICEP will be confirmed and the bladder injuries occurring during morcellation after AEEP will be examined.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
    • Konya
      • Konya, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye), 42250
        • Necmettin Erbakan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will include adult patients undergoing AEEP surgery. The presence of bladder injuries during the operation will be assessed according to the BICEP classification, and any potential injuries will be recorded.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥40
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≤4
  • Patients undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) or Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological disorders that may affect bladder function, such as cerebrovascular stroke or Parkinson's disease.
  • Patients with active urinary tract infection.
  • Patients diagnosed with bladder cancer within the last 2 years.
  • Patients with prostate cancer.
  • Patients who have undergone previous prostate surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Successful Validation of the Bladder Injury Classification System for Endoscopic Procedure Classification System for Bladder Injuries Occurring During Morcellation in AEEP Operations
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Approximately 250 participants will be evaluated using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 4 to assess the severity of the injury. A score of 0 indicates no injury, while a score of 4 indicates extensive avulsion of part of the bladder. In this system, the severity of the injury increases as the score increases.
Up to 24 weeks
The impact of different energy sources and morcellation devices on bladder injury
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
The severity of the injury will be assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 4. A score of 0 indicates no injury, while a score of 4 indicates the highest degree of avulsion of part of the bladder. In this system, the severity of the injury increases as the score increases.
Up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Qmax Increase Following Morcellation in AEEP Operations
Time Frame: 1 month post surgery
Assessed by maximum flow rate (Q-max) measured using uroflowmetry by ml/sec, better outcome above 15ml/sec
1 month post surgery
Postoperative Improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 1 month post surgery
The IPSS form will be filled out for calculation. Scores of 0-7 indicate mild symptoms, 8-19 indicate moderate symptoms, and 20-35 indicate severe symptoms.
1 month post surgery
Duration of catheterization
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
The duration of catheterization post-operation will be calculated in days.
Up to 10 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The duration of hospital stay post-operation will be calculated in days.
Up to 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Injury

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Prostate Interventions for Anatomic Enucleation

Subscribe