Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

February 19, 2024 updated by: Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy Used to Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Damage After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Eurasia
      • İzmir, Eurasia, Turkey, 35090

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who will undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons in our hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients
  2. The operation will be performed in our hospital
  3. Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign
  4. After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies
  2. malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings
  3. Patients do not want to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard cystoscopy
Standard cystoscopy arm
carbon dioxide cystoscopy
carbon dioxide cystoscopy arm
Diagnostic test: carbon dioxide cystoscopy
Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of carbon dioxide cystoscopy.
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
It was aimed to evaluate the speed and image quality of carbon dioxide cystoscopy in detecting intravesical masses.
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025/05/02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data table will be shared with the researcher who requests it.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complication of Surgical Procedure

Clinical Trials on carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Lebanon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe