In Hospital 24 Hour Observation of Syncope Patients (RISC)

February 23, 2026 updated by: Frederik de Lange, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Clinical Benefit of 24-hour in Hospital Observation of Syncope Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Emergency Room

Syncope is very common and has a broad differential diagnosis. Guidelines on syncope recommend to apply guideline based syncope algorithm (SA) to identify low- / intermediate risk syncope patients and recommend to discharge these patients. The time window when to discharge these patients is not defined in the guidelines. In current medical practice low- / intermediate risk syncope patients are either immediately discharged or discharged after 24-hour observation with telemetry (TM). There seems to be an equipoise for both treatment strategies in current medical practice for these low risk syncope patients. A randomized controlled trial to compare discharge after 24 hour observation including TM with immediate discharge has never been done on the Cardiac Emergency Room (CER).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The diagnosis of syncope is a worldwide clinical dilemma. Appropriate identification of low risk vs high risk will reduce inappropriate admission for 24-hour observation with TM. The Dutch Geriatrics Society prioritized syncope management on its research agenda. This project is endorsed by the Dutch Societies of Neurology, Cardiology, Geriatrics, and Internal Medicine and results in freely accessible tutorials on an educational website: www.syncopedia.org.

A randomized clinical trial that includes guideline based SA as routine medical care in the setting of a cardiac emergency room, that compares discharge after 24-hour observation with TM (reference treatment strategy) and immediate discharge (investigational treatment strategy) for low- and intermediate syncope patients will provide new insights and improve syncope health care for these patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

640

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients attending the Cardiac Emergency Room with low- and intermediate risk syncope.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients that are assessed as low- and intermediate risk syncope, are eligible for inclusion in this trial.

The initial syncope evaluation includes:

  1. Complete and thorough history taking of the syncope event and past medical history
  2. Physical examination including supine and standing BP measurement and
  3. 12 lead ECG.

Exclusion Criteria:

A potential patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Those aged <18 years
  2. Those in whom syncope / transient loss of consciousness co-exist with trauma or other serious condition identified in the CER (massive bleeding, pulmonary embolus) or any high-risk features upon assessment with guideline based SA
  3. Those with any other conditions then syncope / transient loss of consciousness for which admission is required (including social indication for admission, etc.)
  4. Contraindication for early discharge as the discretion of the responsible physician
  5. Those with a learning disability
  6. Those presenting with pre-syncope
  7. Those who are unwilling to provide informed consent (those will be asked to be enrolled for the SYNCOPE R.I.S.C-registry)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
discharge
immediate discharge with ambulant HR monitoring (investigational treatment strategy) in low- and intermediate syncope patients in the setting of cardiac emergency room
ambulant heart rate monitor (holter) for 24 hour.
admission for 24 hours with rhythmobservation
discharge after 24-hour telemetric-observation (reference treatment strategy) in low- and intermediate syncope patients in the setting of cardiac emergency room
ambulant heart rate monitor (holter) for 24 hour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Supraventricular tachycardia:
Time Frame: 24 hour after randomization
a) Any atrial tachycardia (sustained or non-sustained ≥ 3 consecutive complexes) b) Atrio-Ventricular Nodal Re-entry Tachycardia (AVNRT) or Atrioventricular Re-Entry Tachycardia (AVRT) c) Premature Atrial Complex (PAC): >2 doublets or >2 episodes of 3 seconds duration of bi- or trigeminy d) Atrial Fibrillation de novo
24 hour after randomization
Incidence of Ventricular tachycardia:
Time Frame: 24 hour after randomization
a) Any Ventricular Tachycardia (sustained/non sustained) b) Ventricular Fibrillation c) Premature Ventricular Complexes: >2 doublets or >2 episodes of 3 seconds duration of bi- or trigemini
24 hour after randomization
Incidence of Conduction disorders:
Time Frame: 24 hour after randomization
a) Asystole >3sec (including conversion pauses) b) New first degree AV block with PQ>300 msec c) Progression first degree AV block with 15% c) 2nd degree AV block Mobitz type I and II d) 3rd degree AV block e) Any SA block
24 hour after randomization
Incidence of Other events
Time Frame: 24 hour after randomization
a) Syncope recurrence b) Unexplained fall with injury c) All cause death d) Cardiovascular death
24 hour after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Syncope related healthcare costs
Time Frame: 1 month
Health care costs will be calculated on the basis of the tariffs set by the schedule of the Dutch National Health Service.
1 month
Hospital utilization and duration of total in-hospital stay for both arms
Time Frame: 1 month
Hospital utilization of both treatment strategies will be quantified by the duration of the in-hospital stay from the moment of randomization.
1 month
Proportion of additional diagnoses after both treatment strategies
Time Frame: 24 hour after randomization

The analysis will be conducted at the major group level, i.e. (1) reflex syncope, (2) orthostatic hypotension, (3) cardiac syncope. Diagnostic yield is defined as the number of patients receiving a diagnosis in the patient chart and is determined at two times during this trial:

  1. After performing the guideline based syncope algorithm (before enrollment of the patient) and
  2. At 24 hours after completing each treatment strategy.
24 hour after randomization
Assessment of Quality of life (EQ5D - EuroQuol 5Dimensions)
Time Frame: up to 1 Month
The questionnaires include a check-list to assess health care consumption (consultations, admissions), productivity, and QoL measures. 5 dimensions for describing health states. Scores are: no, mild, moderate, severe and extreme or unable to do. (can be scored as 1-5) In the questionnaire is also an Visual Analogue Scale: overall assessment of respondent's health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
up to 1 Month
Assessment of Quality of life (Short Form Health Survey 12)
Time Frame: up to 1 Month
Questionnaire to asses Quality of Life. Questionnaire contains closed questions with different response options. 'Yes/no', 'never(1)-always(6)' or 'no limitation(1)-severe limitation(3)'
up to 1 Month
Assessment of Quality of life (SyncopeDailyFunctioning)
Time Frame: up to 1 Month
Questionnaire to assess qyality of life in daily functioning. Questionnaire contains closed questions with different response options. 'Yes/no' or '1(negative)-8(positive)'
up to 1 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederik de Lange, MD PhD, PI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Syncope

Clinical Trials on holter

Subscribe