Parental Misperceptions on Child Nutrition in India: Implications for Child Feeding Practices and Growth

October 15, 2024 updated by: Jeffrey Broadman Weaver, University of Southern California

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the role of parental misperceptions and information gaps in contributing to poor child dietary practices and high child undernutrition rates in India. The main research questions it seeks to answer are:

  1. Do mothers systematically overestimate the nutritional status (height- and weight-for-age percentiles) of their children, relative to global World Health Organization (WHO) standards and other children in their region?,
  2. Do mothers underestimate the returns to child nutrition on long-term health, education, and labor market outcomes?,
  3. What mechanisms could explain the formation of such misperceptions? Are mothers with higher exposure to undernourished children more likely to overestimate their children's nutritional status?, and
  4. Would updating mothers' beliefs about a) their children's true height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles, and/or b) the returns to child nutrition, improve child feeding practices, utilization of government nutrition services, and child growth outcomes?

The study involves an individual-level randomized controlled trial with 1500 mothers of children aged 7-24 months in Telangana, India, with two information treatment arms and one control arm. The first treatment will update mothers' beliefs on the relative height- and weight-for-age percentiles of their children, and the second will provide information on the impacts of child undernutrition on long-term health (risk of chronic and infectious diseases, mortality), education (high school test scores, years of education), and labor market (earnings) outcomes.

The treatment and control groups will be compared to assess if the information treatments improve outcomes related to child feeding practices, consumption of government-supplied therapeutic food, cognition measures, and child growth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the role of parental misperceptions and information gaps in contributing to poor child dietary practices and high rates of child undernutrition in India. This study is guided by two core hypotheses:

  1. Parents systematically overestimate the nutritional status of their children: If parents form expectations about how healthy their child is by observing other children around them, then parents in areas with high levels of stunting and wasting may be more likely to believe that their own child is relatively healthy and have a skewed perception of "ideal" height and weight levels.
  2. Parents systematically underestimate the returns to child nutrition on long-term health, education, and labor market outcomes: While there is a large literature documenting the effects of child nutrition on the incidence of infectious and chronic diseases, years of education, test scores, and earnings in adulthood, this information is most likely not common knowledge among parents in India, particularly in rural areas.

These misperceptions, if proven true, may create a suboptimal equilibrium for child nutrition outcomes, trapping families in a cycle of inadequate nutrition.

The main research questions are:

  1. Do mothers systematically overestimate the nutritional status (height- and weight-for-age percentiles) of their children, relative to global WHO standards and other children in their region?,
  2. Do mothers underestimate the returns to child nutrition on long-term health, education, and labor market outcomes?,
  3. What mechanisms could explain the formation of such misperceptions? Are mothers with higher exposure to undernourished children more likely to overestimate their children's nutritional status?, and
  4. Would updating mothers' beliefs about a) their children's true height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles, and/or b) the returns to child nutrition, improve child feeding practices, utilization of government nutrition services, and child growth outcomes?

The research design involves an individual-level field experiment with 1500 mothers of children aged 7 to 24 months, with two treatment arms and a control arm:

  • Treatment arm 1: Update mothers' beliefs on the height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles of their child relative to a reference group of healthy children based on WHO standards
  • Treatment arm 2: Treatment 1 + information on the impacts of child undernutrition on long-term health (risk of chronic and infectious diseases, mortality), education (high school test scores, years of education), and labor market (earnings) outcomes, synthesized from existing literature
  • Control arm: Status-quo, no intervention

The main outcomes of interest are - a) willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a protein supplement/food bundle for the child, measured at the end of the baseline survey, and b) beliefs on child nutrition, c) child feeding practices (frequency of meals, diet diversity, diet adequacy, protein consumption) measured through a 24-hour diet recall module, d) consumption of government-supplied therapeutic food, e) child height, weight, and anthropometric z-scores, f) child health outcomes: episodes of illness, g) household food expenditures, and h) child cognition measures, measured during the endline survey.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1542

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500038
        • Department of Women Development and Child Welfare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biological mothers of sampled children aged 7-24 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical/health condition that precludes individuals from understanding the study procedures or communicating with study personnel (eg. deafness, inability to speak, mental health conditions)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Arm 1: Relative Nutritional Status
Provide information on the true height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles of the child relative to a reference group of healthy children based on WHO standards
The intervention involves providing information on the height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles of children relative to a reference group of healthy children based on WHO standards
Experimental: Treatment Arm 2: Relative Nutritional Status and Returns
Provide information on the true height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles of the child relative to a reference group of healthy children based on WHO standards AND provide information on the impacts of child undernutrition on health (risk of chronic and infectious diseases, mortality), education (high school test scores, years of education), and labor market (earnings) outcomes, synthesized from existing literature
The intervention involves providing information on the height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles of children relative to a reference group of healthy children based on WHO standards
The intervention involves providing information on the effects of child undernutrition on long-term health, education, and labor market outcomes.
No Intervention: Control Arm
Status-quo, no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average willingness-to-pay for protein-rich food bundle
Time Frame: Baseline
All mothers who participate in the survey will be entered into a lottery to win a bundle of protein-rich food items for their child or, alternatively, a randomly chosen cash prize (amount may range from Rs. 100 to Rs. 2000). 25 lottery "winners" will be chosen randomly at the end of the baseline survey. Mothers will be asked to state their preferences between the food bundle and several potential cash prize amounts, using a multiple-price-list elicitation method. One cash prize amount will be randomly chosen for each mother, and their choice for that amount will be implemented in case they win the lottery. WTP will be measured by the mid-point of the interval of two cash amounts at which a mother switches from preferring to receive cash to preferring to receive food. Possible values range from 0 to 2000. Average willingness-to-pay will be compared between mothers in the treatment groups and the control group.
Baseline
Difference between true and perceived height-for-age percentile relative to WHO standards
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
The difference between the child's true height-for-age percentile relative to the WHO reference population and the mother's perceived percentile rank. Values may range from 0 to 100.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between true and perceived weight-for-age percentile relative to WHO standards
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
The difference between the child's true weight-for-age percentile relative to the WHO reference population and the mother's perceived percentile rank. Values may range from 0 to 100.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Knowledge score on returns to child nutrition (Binary)
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" if at least half the prompts (3 out of 6) about the returns to child nutrition are answered correctly, and "0" otherwise. This is a binary indicator constructed based on the knowledge score scale that may range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing better knowledge.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Minimum frequency of meals
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" if the child consumed the minimum recommended number of meals in the last 24 hours, based on their age, and "0" otherwise
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Minimum dietary diversity
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" if the child consumed food from at least 5 of the 8 specified food groups in the last 24 hours, and "0" otherwise. This is a binary indicator constructed based on the World Health Organization "Minimum Dietary Diversity - Infant and Young Child Feeding" (MDD-IYCF) scale. Scores may range from 0 to 8, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Height-for-age z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Height-for-age z-score at the time of the endline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Weight-for-age z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Weight-for-age z-score at the time of the endline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Weight-for-height z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Weight-for-height z-score at the time of the endline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Consumption of Balamrutham
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" if the child consumed Balamrutham (government-provided therapeutic food) in the last 24 hours, and "0" otherwise
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
CREDI child cognition scale z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
The Caregiver-Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) Short Form is a validated set of 20 population-level measures of early childhood development (ECD) for children from birth to age three (0-36 months). The responses on this 20-point scale (based on age) will be converted to a norm-referenced standardized Z-score for overall development. The z-scores may range from -6 to +6, with larger scores representing better outcomes.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in height-for-age z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between height-for-age z-score between the endline survey and the baseline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Change from baseline in weight-for-age z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between weight-for-age z-score between the endline survey and the baseline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Change from baseline in weight-for-height z-score
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between weight-for-height z-score between the endline survey and the baseline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Change from baseline in height
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between height between the endline survey and the baseline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Change from baseline in weight
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Difference between weight between the endline survey and the baseline survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Episodes of illness in last 14 days (binary)
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" of the child experienced any episodes of illness in the 14 days prior to the survey
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Household food expenditure in last calendar month
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Total household expenditure on food in the last calendar month
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge score on returns to child nutrition (Continuous)
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
The number of correctly answered prompts about the returns to child nutrition. Scores may range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing better knowledge.
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Diet adequacy
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Binary variable coded "1" if the child meets the minimum frequency of meals AND diet diversity criteria
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Grams of protein consumed in last 24 hours
Time Frame: During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline
Total grams of protein consumed by the child in last 24 hours
During endline survey, an average of 4 months (or 17 weeks) from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sneha Nimmagadda, M.Sc., University of Southern California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APP-24-02211-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be made publicly available through an open-access repository (eg. ICPSR) after publication of the study findings.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

No access criteria. De-identified data will be made publicly available through an open-access repository (eg. ICPSR).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Information on Relative Nutritional Status

Subscribe